On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:31:21 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
<[email protected]> wrote:

    ><Jacqueline> wrote:
    >> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:25:10 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
    >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >
    >> >Martin wrote:
    >> >
    >> >> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:20:08 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
    >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> >
    >> >> >Martin wrote:
    >> >> >
    >> >> >> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:00:41 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
    >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >> >>
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> ><Jacqueline> spat
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> >> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:34:58 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
    >> >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >> >> >>
    >> >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> >> ><Jacqueline> gobsmacked us with:
    >> >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:16:11 GMT, "a.spencer3"
    >> >> >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >> >> >> >>
    >> >> >> >> >> >Any personal recommendations for a reasonable, budgetish
    >(3*?)
    >> >very
    >> >> >> >> >central
    >> >> >> >> >> >hotel in Bruges?
    >> >> >> >> >> >Many thanks.
    >> >> >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> >> >> >Surreyman
    >> >> >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> >> >> Martin's Brugge Hotel. Situated opposite the old Belfort in
    >the
    >> >> >> >> >> centre of this beautifull city! 500 metres from the diamond
    >> >musuem
    >> >> >en
    >> >> >> >> >> 400 metres from the Memling museum - St. John's hospital!
    >> >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> >> >And the good town fathers of Bruges said to Jacqueline:
    >"Madame,
    >> >we
    >> >> >> >don't
    >> >> >> >> >know how much you weigh, but whatever it is, we will pay you
    >EUR100
    >> >> >per
    >> >> >> >kilo
    >> >> >> >> >to leave us...!!!".
    >> >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> >> >[I think it's because Jacqueline actually smelled WORSE than
    >some
    >> >of
    >> >> >> >Bruges'
    >> >> >> >> >famous canals...!!!]
    >> >> >> >>
    >> >> >> >> Go back to hell, Morrow!
    >> >> >> >>
    >> >> >> >> And fathers of Bruges....don't pay Morrow for HIS weight...it
    >will
    >> >> >> >> probably cost you more than 10.000 euro's!
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> >BWAHAHAAAAAAAA....bend over, Dearie...!!!
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> >Lol...
    >> >> >>
    >> >> >> You pay by the hour in Jacqueline's hotel. Be quick!
    >> >> >
    >> >> >
    >> >> >I hear gRunge only takes *seconds*...in fact he often doesn't even
    >make
    >> >it
    >> >> >to J's "chambre de joie"...
    >> >>
    >> >> Anything to save a penny gRunt?
    >> >
    >> >
    >> >It will be good training for our Jacqueline to prepare for her old
    >age...
    >> I will always be 50 years younger than you old sillt goat hahahah!
    >Oh, so you are ONE year old...that explains your "mentality" then!
    >BTW how ARE things in the sand box...???
    >;--p
You even can't count! But that doesn't surprise me hahahaha!

Martin wrote:

    > On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:25:10 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > >Martin wrote:
    > >
    > >> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:20:08 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
    > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >
    > >> >Martin wrote:
    > >> >
    > >> >> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:00:41 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
    > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >> >>
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> ><Jacqueline> spat
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> >> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:34:58 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
    > >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >> >> >>
    > >> >> >> >
    > >> >> >> ><Jacqueline> gobsmacked us with:
    > >> >> >> >
    > >> >> >> >> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:16:11 GMT, "a.spencer3"
    > >> >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >> >> >> >>
    > >> >> >> >> >Any personal recommendations for a reasonable, budgetish
(3*?)
    > >very
    > >> >> >> >central
    > >> >> >> >> >hotel in Bruges?
    > >> >> >> >> >Many thanks.
    > >> >> >> >> >
    > >> >> >> >> >Surreyman
    > >> >> >> >> >
    > >> >> >> >> Martin's Brugge Hotel. Situated opposite the old Belfort in
the
    > >> >> >> >> centre of this beautifull city! 500 metres from the diamond
    > >musuem
    > >> >en
    > >> >> >> >> 400 metres from the Memling museum - St. John's hospital!
    > >> >> >> >
    > >> >> >> >
    > >> >> >> >And the good town fathers of Bruges said to Jacqueline:
"Madame,
    > >we
    > >> >> >don't
    > >> >> >> >know how much you weigh, but whatever it is, we will pay you
EUR100
    > >> >per
    > >> >> >kilo
    > >> >> >> >to leave us...!!!".
    > >> >> >> >
    > >> >> >> >[I think it's because Jacqueline actually smelled WORSE than
some
    > >of
    > >> >> >Bruges'
    > >> >> >> >famous canals...!!!]
    > >> >> >>
    > >> >> >> Go back to hell, Morrow!
    > >> >> >>
    > >> >> >> And fathers of Bruges....don't pay Morrow for HIS weight...it
will
    > >> >> >> probably cost you more than 10.000 euro's!
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> >BWAHAHAAAAAAAA....bend over, Dearie...!!!
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> >Lol...
    > >> >>
    > >> >> You pay by the hour in Jacqueline's hotel. Be quick!
    > >> >
    > >> >
    > >> >I hear gRunge only takes *seconds*...in fact he often doesn't even
make
    > >it
    > >> >to J's "chambre de joie"...
    > >>
    > >> Anything to save a penny gRunt?
    > >
    > >
    > >It will be good training for our Jacqueline to prepare for her old
age...
    > To avoid becoming a lonely swine herd?


"But officer, I was only trying to help gRunge over the hedge...!!!"

--
Best
Greg

<Jacqueline> belched:

    > Het peil van je postings stijgt...zielig mannetje!


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...l=chi-news-hed


Suburb say pigs aren't welcome
Lake Forest votes to ban farm animals

By Susan Kuczka
Chicago Tribune staff reporters

August 8, 2006

"Lake Forest aldermen tentatively approved a ban on the ownership of farm
animals, including pot-bellied pigs, in residential areas Monday night,
giving owners a year to find new homes for their pets.

The action came in the wake of a neighborhood petition drive seeking removal
of Vietnamese pot-bellied pigs on a Sheridan Road estate. The ban, which
would take effect September 2007, still needs formal approval at the
council's meeting in September.

Before the 5-3 vote, the owner of the three pet pigs urged Lake Forest
officials to allow her to keep the animals.

"I want to know, why now? Where is the clear and present danger?" Estelle
Walgreen asked aldermen during a City Council meeting to discuss the city's
animal-control ordinance.

Shortly after Walgreen moved to the 2.3-acre, $3.3 million estate in May,
more than 300 residents of the North Shore suburb signed a petition seeking
removal of Walgreen's pigs--Jacqueline, Piggy and gRunge. Walgreen moved to
the estate after divorcing her husband, an heir to the Walgreens drugstore
chain.

Neighbors Kathleen and Robert Murphy filed suit against Walgreen in June,
contending that the city's animal-control ordinance bars pigs and other farm
animals from residing on lots that are less than 10 acres. Walgreen had
lived on a 10-acre lot in Lake Forest.

After her neighbors complained to the city, Walgreen sent letters in support
of the pigs to aldermen. Walgreen, the mother of two young children, told
officials that the pigs are beloved members of her family who have never
caused a problem for neighbors.

But last week, neighbors called police when one of the animals wandered into
the Murphys' back yard, knocking over patio furniture and trampling the
garden before officers got the animal back to the Walgreen property,
Kathleen Murphy said.

Police Chief W. Michael Hosking said Walgreen was given a ticket for
allowing her pig to roam without supervision, a violation of the
animal-control ordinance.

Aldermen considered several amendments to the ordinance at Monday night's
meeting, hoping to forge a workable compromise.

One option would be to exempt pot-bellied pigs that are a maximum of 250
pounds or 30 inches tall from the 10-acre restriction.

Another would be to exempt the Walgreen pigs from enforcement of the
ordinance as long as they do not pose a danger or public nuisance.

Walgreen's relationship with pigs began more than a decade ago when her
husband gave her a 50-pound piglet she named Jacqueline.

After the divorce, Walgreen brought the pigs to her new property, where she
converted a two-car garage into a barn so the pigs had someplace to sleep.

Problems arose after the Murphys heard a continuous "belching" sound coming
from their new neighbor's back yard. They immediately complained to police,
who declined to issue a ticket, saying the animal-control ordinance was
vague when it came to regulating pet pigs.

Last month, aldermen ordered up a study of the ordinance, along with those
of nearby communities to determine how pot-bellied pigs normally are
regulated.

Most communities on the North Shore do not allow pigs, horses, sheep and
other common farm animals in residential sections, according to a survey
city officials conducted.

In an effort to mend fences with the Murphys, Walgreen recently had a
7-foot-high screen placed between the back yards of the neighboring homes.

Kathleen Murphy said the barrier won't solve the problem she has with the
pigs.

"They smell, and the sounds are still there, and these animals like to
forage so they can just go dig under the fence," she said.

"The pigs should go."

----------

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:19:39 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
<[email protected]> wrote:


    >"The pigs should go."

In Delft, Jacquie has a reputation for being a bit of a goer.
--

Martin

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 17:25:00 +0200, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:

    >On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:19:39 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
    ><[email protected]> wrote:
    >>"The pigs should go."
    >In Delft, Jacquie has a reputation for being a bit of a goer.

Eet nou braaf je bordje leeg, dat mammie voor je heeft klaar staan!
Misschien word je dan ooit nog eens een flink ventje!!!

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:19:39 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
<[email protected]> wrote:

    ><Jacqueline> belched:
    >> Het peil van je postings stijgt...zielig mannetje!
    >http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...l=chi-news-hed
    >Suburb say pigs aren't welcome
    >Lake Forest votes to ban farm animals
    >By Susan Kuczka
    >Chicago Tribune staff reporters
    >August 8, 2006
    >"Lake Forest aldermen tentatively approved a ban on the ownership of farm
    >animals, including pot-bellied pigs, in residential areas Monday night,
    >giving owners a year to find new homes for their pets.
    >The action came in the wake of a neighborhood petition drive seeking removal
    >of Vietnamese pot-bellied pigs on a Sheridan Road estate. The ban, which
    >would take effect September 2007, still needs formal approval at the
    >council's meeting in September.
    >Before the 5-3 vote, the owner of the three pet pigs urged Lake Forest
    >officials to allow her to keep the animals.
    >"I want to know, why now? Where is the clear and present danger?" Estelle
    >Walgreen asked aldermen during a City Council meeting to discuss the city's
    >animal-control ordinance.
    >Shortly after Walgreen moved to the 2.3-acre, $3.3 million estate in May,
    >more than 300 residents of the North Shore suburb signed a petition seeking
    >removal of Walgreen's pigs--Jacqueline, Piggy and gRunge. Walgreen moved to
    >the estate after divorcing her husband, an heir to the Walgreens drugstore
    >chain.
    >Neighbors Kathleen and Robert Murphy filed suit against Walgreen in June,
    >contending that the city's animal-control ordinance bars pigs and other farm
    >animals from residing on lots that are less than 10 acres. Walgreen had
    >lived on a 10-acre lot in Lake Forest.
    >After her neighbors complained to the city, Walgreen sent letters in support
    >of the pigs to aldermen. Walgreen, the mother of two young children, told
    >officials that the pigs are beloved members of her family who have never
    >caused a problem for neighbors.
    >But last week, neighbors called police when one of the animals wandered into
    >the Murphys' back yard, knocking over patio furniture and trampling the
    >garden before officers got the animal back to the Walgreen property,
    >Kathleen Murphy said.
    >Police Chief W. Michael Hosking said Walgreen was given a ticket for
    >allowing her pig to roam without supervision, a violation of the
    >animal-control ordinance.
    >Aldermen considered several amendments to the ordinance at Monday night's
    >meeting, hoping to forge a workable compromise.
    >One option would be to exempt pot-bellied pigs that are a maximum of 250
    >pounds or 30 inches tall from the 10-acre restriction.
    >Another would be to exempt the Walgreen pigs from enforcement of the
    >ordinance as long as they do not pose a danger or public nuisance.
    >Walgreen's relationship with pigs began more than a decade ago when her
    >husband gave her a 50-pound piglet she named Jacqueline.
    >After the divorce, Walgreen brought the pigs to her new property, where she
    >converted a two-car garage into a barn so the pigs had someplace to sleep.
    >Problems arose after the Murphys heard a continuous "belching" sound coming
    >from their new neighbor's back yard. They immediately complained to police,
    >who declined to issue a ticket, saying the animal-control ordinance was
    >vague when it came to regulating pet pigs.
    >Last month, aldermen ordered up a study of the ordinance, along with those
    >of nearby communities to determine how pot-bellied pigs normally are
    >regulated.
    >Most communities on the North Shore do not allow pigs, horses, sheep and
    >other common farm animals in residential sections, according to a survey
    >city officials conducted.
    >In an effort to mend fences with the Murphys, Walgreen recently had a
    >7-foot-high screen placed between the back yards of the neighboring homes.
    >Kathleen Murphy said the barrier won't solve the problem she has with the
    >pigs.
    >"They smell, and the sounds are still there, and these animals like to
    >forage so they can just go dig under the fence," she said.
    >"The pigs should go."
    >----------
Wow......this posting completely covers you Morrow!!!!!

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:34:58 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
<[email protected]> wrote:

[drivel]

Morrow, you're tiresome and juvenile. {plon***

-- Larry

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 17:25:00 +0200, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:

    >On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:19:39 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
    ><[email protected]> wrote:
    >>"The pigs should go."
    >In Delft, Jacquie has a reputation for being a bit of a goer.

You must be an inhabitant of St. Joris.......an institution for
people with a mental illness in Delft!

"a.spencer3" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:fg%[email protected]...
    > Any personal recommendations for a reasonable, budgetish (3*?) very
    > central
    > hotel in Bruges?

I liked the Ibis, which you can book from the Accor hotel web site:

http://www.accorhotels.com/accorhotels/index.html

I think Ibis are 2*, but I've stayed in several 3* hotels that were worse
than the average Ibis. The Novotel is a bit upmarket if you prefer that.

Colin Bignell

I've been stopping off in Brugge for one night, before I catch the ferry
home from Zeebrugge, for several years and I always stop at the 'Adornes'.
It is about a 10 min walk from the centre but is fairly quiet and relatively
tourist free. They also do a good breakfast. There are some good pubs
nearby which stay open most of the night. It is not a budget hotel but you
only get what you pay for. They do a free underground car park and free
bikes as well.

http://www.adornes.be/


"a.spencer3" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:fg%[email protected]...
    > Any personal recommendations for a reasonable, budgetish (3*?) very
    > central
    > hotel in Bruges?
    > Many thanks.
    > Surreyman
    >

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 18:24:05 +0100, Ranazu wrote:
    > I've been stopping off in Brugge for one night, before I catch the ferry
    > home from Zeebrugge, for several years and I always stop at the 'Adornes'.
    > It is about a 10 min walk from the centre but is fairly quiet and relatively
    > tourist free. They also do a good breakfast. There are some good pubs
    > nearby which stay open most of the night. It is not a budget hotel but you
    > only get what you pay for. They do a free underground car park and free
    > bikes as well.
    > http://www.adornes.be/

We stayed in the Adornes in our trip to Brugge as well, and would
definitely stay there again. It is a bit more expensive than some
alternatives, but the free bikes saved us 24 euro and the breakfast was
one of the better ones we've had. Bikes are a great way to get around
Brugge.

--
-BB-
To e-mail me, unmunge my address

Here comes the daily cretin out of his brown paperbag, pestering Jacqueline,
as it is his way of chasing gals
Duh

"Gregory Morrow" <[email protected]> a écrit dans
le message de news: Sx%[email protected] et...
    > <Jacqueline> gobsmacked us with:
    >> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:16:11 GMT, "a.spencer3"
    >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >Any personal recommendations for a reasonable, budgetish (3*?) very
    > central
    >> >hotel in Bruges?
    >> >Many thanks.
    >> >
    >> >Surreyman
    >> >
    >> Martin's Brugge Hotel. Situated opposite the old Belfort in the
    >> centre of this beautifull city! 500 metres from the diamond musuem en
    >> 400 metres from the Memling museum - St. John's hospital!
    > And the good town fathers of Bruges said to Jacqueline: "Madame, we don't
    > know how much you weigh, but whatever it is, we will pay you EUR100 per
    > kilo
    > to leave us...!!!".
    > [I think it's because Jacqueline actually smelled WORSE than some of
    > Bruges'
    > famous canals...!!!]
    > --
    > Best
    > Greg
    >

Hello there
How about this

http://www.busabout.com/default.asp?...article&ID=535

it is an excellent budget accommodation called Suffles Inn in centre -

Graeme


a.spencer3 wrote:
    > Any personal recommendations for a reasonable, budgetish (3*?) very central
    > hotel in Bruges?
    > Many thanks.
    >
    > Surreyman