Go Back  British Expats > Usenet Groups > rec.travel.* > rec.travel.europe
Reload this Page >

Afrikaans and Dutch language

Afrikaans and Dutch language

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 26th 2003, 9:56 am
  #16  
Hatunen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Afrikaans and Dutch language

On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 06:49:05 GMT, John Bermont
wrote:

    >Alec wrote:
    >>
    >> This isn't entirely European travel related, but can someone enlighten me on
    >> the differences and similarities between the two? Grammar, vocabulary,
    >> syntax? Can a Dutch speaker converse/understand Afrikaans and vice versa?
    >>
    >Years ago I had a girl friend in Haarlem who was originally from South
    >Africa. She spoke Afrikaans but had no problem conversing in The
    >Netherlands. The language difference is that Afrikaans is a pidgin
    >Dutch. I.e., the grammar of Afrikaans is greatly simplified though the
    >language is intact. The Dutch who emigrated to South Africa were known
    >as Boers, which is the Dutch word for farmer. A war was named after
    >them, and a beautiful mild young Dutch cheese is named Boerkaas. My
    >friend, Annette Kampinga, 25, was murdered by a terrorist in 1980.

Strictly speaking, a pidgin is a simplified language created by an
indigenous population that doesn't know the language of the new
people. It generally has rudimentary grammar and may not be considered
a true language by some linguists. The local Blacks might have created
a pidgin to deal with the Boers, but the Boers would have been
devcelopign their own language in isolation from the Dutch homeland.


************* DAVE HATUNEN ([email protected]) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
 
Old Feb 27th 2003, 7:25 am
  #17  
Padraig Breathnach
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Afrikaans and Dutch language

"a.spencer3" wrote:

    >EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]...
    >> It is no less "French" than the French spoken in Quebec, but neither one
    >> of them is Parisian French (which, when I was going to school, was
    >> considered the model for "pure" French).
    >For some reason, I'm told in the Netherlands that 'pure' Dutch is that of
    >Utrecht. Any reason?
I presume that your informant was from Utrecht.

PB
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.