Where would you rather be?
#1
If money was no object... and family ties weren't a consideration... what village, town, city, State, County or Country would you call home - and why?
#2
I think I'd try Cornwall and, if money was no object, I'd definitely want a house on a cliff overlooking the sea (but high enough not to flood!)
#3
The Brit is back







Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,211
From: NS, Canada 2007-2013. Now....England!











#7
Money no object? I'd stay right where I am (might add some soundproofing).
#9
Heading for Poppyland










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 17,529
From: North Norfolk and northern New York State











I'd have a pied-Ã -terre in New York City, maybe somewhere in the west 80s .. walking distance from Zabars would be nice. And a modest house by the sea in England, Saltburn or Whitby would be options. Or Budleigh Salterton.
#10
The Brit is back







Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,211
From: NS, Canada 2007-2013. Now....England!











nice place On second thoughts, if money were no object, I would have a home in Cornwall, NS, Bermuda, Bahamas, Barbados, NY, France, Italy, and maybe a few others I haven't thought of yet
#11
Heading for Poppyland










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 17,529
From: North Norfolk and northern New York State











But owning extra homes is a bit of a worry - you'd end up travelling all year just to visit each one every so often.. I can't see owning more than two homes max. My thought is, have one home in a city (NYC) and one in a small town by the sea. My one minimum demand nowadays is, I don't want to live anywhere without public transport (minimum acceptable would be a relatively frequent bus route.) This is after living for 15 years in a remote rural location from which we ALWAYS have to drive.
#12
The Brit is back







Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,211
From: NS, Canada 2007-2013. Now....England!











But owning extra homes is a bit of a worry - you'd end up travelling all year just to visit each one every so often.. I can't see owning more than two homes max. My thought is, have one home in a city (NYC) and one in a small town by the sea. My one minimum demand nowadays is, I don't want to live anywhere without public transport (minimum acceptable would be a relatively frequent bus route.) This is after living for 15 years in a remote rural location from which we ALWAYS have to drive.
#14
I'd move us all to Carrickfergus, without a second thought. Either one of the bigger houses in my old neighbourhood, or buy some land with a view and build a nice big house there.
I'd open up a little musical instrument shop in the town centre and run a little recording studio for local bands out of a back room, and the children can go to my old schools and have a way better time than they'd have here. I'd not go mad with the money, just use it to travel, maybe learn to fly and buy myself a small plane to tour Europe.
Moving back 'home' has been on my mind a lot lately. Thanks for allowing me to indulge myself a little!
I'd open up a little musical instrument shop in the town centre and run a little recording studio for local bands out of a back room, and the children can go to my old schools and have a way better time than they'd have here. I'd not go mad with the money, just use it to travel, maybe learn to fly and buy myself a small plane to tour Europe.
Moving back 'home' has been on my mind a lot lately. Thanks for allowing me to indulge myself a little!
#15
I think I'd prefer to have one house - doesn't have to be grand - and then take vacations in all the different places I like.
SultanofSwing, I love your dream! It sounds idyllic.



