NHS
#31
I don't have an 'American view' at all. I'm American. I live in England. I am a recipient of NHS healthcare. Boom. My view is based on reality - my reality, my personal experiences here with the NHS, and the reality of members of my family over here.
I don't even keep up with American politics any more.
Agree with you, however. The OP would be wise to heed only comments by those who live here (American, British, Chinese, Vulcan, etc.) and have firsthand experience of the NHS.
I don't even keep up with American politics any more.
Agree with you, however. The OP would be wise to heed only comments by those who live here (American, British, Chinese, Vulcan, etc.) and have firsthand experience of the NHS.
Just as I have a British view on things here, being a UK expat.
This is British Expats site, so chances are we have all lived with the NHS for care at some point, there may be a select few who haven't.
I've pretty much done 50/50 with my live, here in the US and in the UK and have worked in the health care industry in both. For patient centered care I'd choose UK, for fancy waiting rooms and good magazines I'd choose US. Although our local doc is starting to slide on the magazine choice and needs to re decorate soon.
Seeing specialists in UK in an emergency you are right in, if you are not life threatening then you are sent an appointment, seems pretty fair to me.
#32
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,517











I'm American; husband is British. We just moved back to England after 6 years in the States.
Having grown up under the US healthcare system, most of the time I find NHS nowhere near the standard that I am used to. Fair enough - it's free over here - but I don't think that means it's better.
We just returned home from a flying visit to Plymouth this week-end to see two new grandchildren. Both mums had pretty horrific birth experiences - beginning with the midwives. Luck of the draw? Perhaps.
Having said that though, and as seen by some of the remarks in this thread, it can be superb.
I'm not knocking the NHS ... I'm satisifed with the fact that I am only paying £7.50/month for my prescription, and that my mammogram is free. Just saying that one's level of service with the NHS is dependent upon so many factors (such as location). It is what it is.
Having grown up under the US healthcare system, most of the time I find NHS nowhere near the standard that I am used to. Fair enough - it's free over here - but I don't think that means it's better.
We just returned home from a flying visit to Plymouth this week-end to see two new grandchildren. Both mums had pretty horrific birth experiences - beginning with the midwives. Luck of the draw? Perhaps.
Having said that though, and as seen by some of the remarks in this thread, it can be superb.
I'm not knocking the NHS ... I'm satisifed with the fact that I am only paying £7.50/month for my prescription, and that my mammogram is free. Just saying that one's level of service with the NHS is dependent upon so many factors (such as location). It is what it is.

The NHS doctors are trained to a high standard and will usually do private consultations if you want to jump the queue for something non-urgent.
#33
BE Forum Addict







Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,294











What country is the following paragraph describing?:
[The clinic director] rattles off a litany of horror stories. There was the man who walked into the clinic with a brain tumour. It took Lee three months to get him an MRI scan and another two to get an appointment with a neurosurgeon. Or the patient whose nerves in his neck were pushed against his spinal cord so that he lost use of both arms; by the time Lee found a way of getting him an MRI he was so sick he had to be operated on immediately. Or the woman who had such heavy periods she would wind up in ER every three months requiring a blood transfusion. What she really needed was a hysterectomy. "It took us almost a year to beg hospitals until she finally did get a hysterectomy," Lee says.
Of course, this is from an excellent report in today's Guardian by Ed Pilkington, who collected this intelligence at a health clinic in Kansas. Highly recommended reading.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...horror-stories
#34
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 13,212
From: San Francisco











I guess I should rephrase my comment to "Almost everyone who posts on this site will have had firsthand experience of the NHS".
#35
BE Forum Addict







Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,606











Well I'm still talking to my husband about moving back. One of his big concerns was about health care and the NHS. He thinks the quality of care isn't great out there. I was wondering if anyone had any links about the health care system the good points and bad points
I'm sure your husband is swayed by the fear based negative propaganda that is rammed down our throats by the political powers and profit based medical and insurance industry...
I have numerous relatives in the UK and NON of them would trade their system for ours...
Neither system is perfect, I'm sure you could find plenty of horror stories about both countries systems...
Do you have 100% coverage with No deductibles at the moment? that's what people in the UK have had for many years, they do pay a co-pay for prescriptions...
What happens if your husband should lose his job in the USA, Yes there is COBRA, but its expensive and without a job its very hard to pay those bills...
Even with healthcare coverage, I'm worried that I may lose everything through medical bankruptcy, it only takes one major illness, In fact its the one thing that scares me most about living in the USA.
1 million people went medically bankrupt in 2009, that's 1 in every three hundred people... I have never heard of a single person going medically bankrupt in the UK, EVER!
I'm not promoting the NHS, I'm just telling you how I feel...
Good Luck to you... Fish
#37
Thread Starter
Forum Regular


Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 85








Fish thanks for your insight. Yes, my husband is swayed politically he is very conservative in thinking and I'm the complete opposite which doesn't help matters. It's hard to open his mind about this.
Medical bankrupty is a big fear for me! Knowing that the economy isn't great my husband still hasn't found decent work. My job is good, with good benefits but it's not amazing. We just had a baby and I'm looking at it as a new parent my world has completely changed now that I have him. I want to know he'll be taken care of if he gets sick, and we are not hurting financially for his care. If he's elligiable as he's a British citizen then it's a no brainer to me.
Sorry for the long ramble :-)
Medical bankrupty is a big fear for me! Knowing that the economy isn't great my husband still hasn't found decent work. My job is good, with good benefits but it's not amazing. We just had a baby and I'm looking at it as a new parent my world has completely changed now that I have him. I want to know he'll be taken care of if he gets sick, and we are not hurting financially for his care. If he's elligiable as he's a British citizen then it's a no brainer to me.
Sorry for the long ramble :-)
Last edited by NatalieLucy; Jun 28th 2011 at 3:21 am.
#38
I guess I should have chosen my words a bit better. I'm just trying to compare the US health system to the UK NHS. From my husband's perspective he's not really open to the NHS due to what he's heard. The waiting lists to see specialists and for operations and the quality of care. I am looking at it from the perspective that it's so much more cheaper than the US health care system. As someone that has had a taste of both I do feel that the US health care system is over the top in how they take care of you. I mean throughout my pregnancy I had so many ultrasounds whereas in the UK my sister had just the bare minimum. I had more ultrasounds on my first pregnancy combined than she ever had on her 2 children. But at the end of the day I get a bill in the mail of $886 for the service.
I have 5 kids , 3 of whom were born in the UK with midwives and 2 (twins) who were born in the US with a an independent lay midwife. There is no way on earth I would have a baby in the US in a hospital they have totally medicalised pregnancy and birth.
#39
How can you not have an American View, you are an American living in the UK.
Just as I have a British view on things here, being a UK expat.
This is British Expats site, so chances are we have all lived with the NHS for care at some point, there may be a select few who haven't.
I've pretty much done 50/50 with my live, here in the US and in the UK and have worked in the health care industry in both. For patient centered care I'd choose UK, for fancy waiting rooms and good magazines I'd choose US. Although our local doc is starting to slide on the magazine choice and needs to re decorate soon.
Seeing specialists in UK in an emergency you are right in, if you are not life threatening then you are sent an appointment, seems pretty fair to me.
Just as I have a British view on things here, being a UK expat.
This is British Expats site, so chances are we have all lived with the NHS for care at some point, there may be a select few who haven't.
I've pretty much done 50/50 with my live, here in the US and in the UK and have worked in the health care industry in both. For patient centered care I'd choose UK, for fancy waiting rooms and good magazines I'd choose US. Although our local doc is starting to slide on the magazine choice and needs to re decorate soon.
Seeing specialists in UK in an emergency you are right in, if you are not life threatening then you are sent an appointment, seems pretty fair to me.

I'd say that the US system is the best if you're one of the lucky few with a good health plan, that you are able to keep without interruption through your whole life, and that doesn't have a ton of hidden deductibles and restrictions - and if you live in an area with good access to healthcare. But that's a lot of conditions. At some point, most people will be without care for one reason or another and they have to pray that they don't get sick during that period. Or, for the athiests like me, just cross your fingers really tight.
What's more the quality of coverage is declining as costs rise. And access to GPs is very hard in some areas - ours routinely tells people to go to the emergency room because there's a 2-week wait for an appointment to see him.
The Canadian system treated me very well, but prescriptions are covered privately, so again, those who lose their jobs can be hit very hard.
While far from perfect, the NHS is by far the most fair system because your treatment never depends on your employment status.
Each system has its faults, but I want to live in a country that views healthcare as a right not a privilege. I want to stop worrying about losing my coverage, and I want to stop feeling guilty about the millions of people who don't have access to the care I get.
I think the OP's husband would be amazed at the care he'd receive if he was in the UK. It's a shame that some US politicians have lied to him about what he'll find.
#40
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,517











I don't think having lots of ultrasounds is necessarily a good thing unless you have a specific problem. Scans in the UK are treated (as they should be) as a way to see if a fetus has any problems, not as a 'meet the baby opportunity' and a money making side line.
I have 5 kids , 3 of whom were born in the UK with midwives and 2 (twins) who were born in the US with a an independent lay midwife. There is no way on earth I would have a baby in the US in a hospital they have totally medicalised pregnancy and birth.
I have 5 kids , 3 of whom were born in the UK with midwives and 2 (twins) who were born in the US with a an independent lay midwife. There is no way on earth I would have a baby in the US in a hospital they have totally medicalised pregnancy and birth.
#41
I can go one better as I've experienced the Canadian system too 
The Canadian system treated me very well, but prescriptions are covered privately, so again, those who lose their jobs can be hit very hard.
While far from perfect, the NHS is by far the most fair system because your treatment never depends on your employment status.
Each system has its faults, but I want to live in a country that views healthcare as a right not a privilege. I want to stop worrying about losing my coverage, and I want to stop feeling guilty about the millions of people who don't have access to the care I get.

The Canadian system treated me very well, but prescriptions are covered privately, so again, those who lose their jobs can be hit very hard.
While far from perfect, the NHS is by far the most fair system because your treatment never depends on your employment status.
Each system has its faults, but I want to live in a country that views healthcare as a right not a privilege. I want to stop worrying about losing my coverage, and I want to stop feeling guilty about the millions of people who don't have access to the care I get.
#42
My sister-in-law has a rare brain disease and is receiving amazing care - I can't imagine how much it has cost to date.
My gran has Alzheimer's and various other ailments and I can't say enough good things about how she has been treated.
My MIL broker her hip and got amazing care both in the hospital and when she got home. plus the fire brigade came round to install extra fire detectors because of her condition.
My mum broke her ankle while fell-walking and got great care after being helicoptered back to civilization by mountain rescue.
Having managed benefits here years ago, I've heard enough US horror stories to last me a lifetime, so we can start trading those if you like
#43
BE Forum Addict







Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,606











"he's heard the Canadian health care system isn't great"
"he's not really open to the NHS due to what he's heard"
"he says he's heard"
He seems to have heard a lot by the looks of it. I wonder who from? My own opinion? I'd swap the "for profit" U.S. system for the NHS any day. A health system that is more focused on patient care and the prevention of illness, rather than making a profit out of people being sick, is always going to be superior.
As for the quality of care, I've always found the NHS to be fine. The U.S. care may look flashier, because of their obsession with technology, but the actual level of knowledge and care is better in the U.K.
As for private insurance in the UK, the cost through BUPA for my wife and I was £170 per month (that was about 6 years ago). Of course, it will be higher now, but not that much. My last month's premium here was $880 and that's for a plan with a $5000 deductible. My wife can't even get insured.
The U.S. health system is rotten to the cure. The people who have "heard" all these things about countries with universal heath care don't help. Try getting informed. It does wonders. BTW, if you're wondering, I work in the health industry here in the U.S. I could tell you stories that would make your hair stand on end, including the one that lead me to telling them where to stick it last week. Unfortunately, it looks like that one is going to court so I can't really go into it.
"he's not really open to the NHS due to what he's heard"
"he says he's heard"
He seems to have heard a lot by the looks of it. I wonder who from? My own opinion? I'd swap the "for profit" U.S. system for the NHS any day. A health system that is more focused on patient care and the prevention of illness, rather than making a profit out of people being sick, is always going to be superior.
As for the quality of care, I've always found the NHS to be fine. The U.S. care may look flashier, because of their obsession with technology, but the actual level of knowledge and care is better in the U.K.
As for private insurance in the UK, the cost through BUPA for my wife and I was £170 per month (that was about 6 years ago). Of course, it will be higher now, but not that much. My last month's premium here was $880 and that's for a plan with a $5000 deductible. My wife can't even get insured.
The U.S. health system is rotten to the cure. The people who have "heard" all these things about countries with universal heath care don't help. Try getting informed. It does wonders. BTW, if you're wondering, I work in the health industry here in the U.S. I could tell you stories that would make your hair stand on end, including the one that lead me to telling them where to stick it last week. Unfortunately, it looks like that one is going to court so I can't really go into it.
#44
BE Forum Addict







Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,294











For the females: when I phoned I got 3 firemen in uniform, the fire engine and a ladder
Oh, and the smoke alarms fitted in the correct place too.Last edited by formula; Jun 28th 2011 at 6:03 am.
#45
BE Forum Addict







Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,606











The fire brigade fits and provides everyones fire detectors for free: all you have to do is phone and ask your county council.
For the females: when I phoned I got 3 firemen in uniform, the fire engine and a ladder
Oh, and the smoke alarms fitted in the correct place too.
For the females: when I phoned I got 3 firemen in uniform, the fire engine and a ladder
Oh, and the smoke alarms fitted in the correct place too.We buy our own, plus ones for carbon monoxide, thats the silent killer, many new homes have to have fire alarms fitted by law, they still need maintaining, we usually change batteries when we push our clocks forwards/backwards...
I'm funny about stuff like this as my Grandad was killed by a fire in a British coal mining disaster.
Our local Fire brigade and Ambulance service have a plan where you can get service for $60 a year, if you dont join the plan you get billed for every call out, that could be $500 just for a 2 mile ride to the local E.R./A&E...
Last edited by Fish n Chips 56; Jun 28th 2011 at 8:28 am.



