![]() |
Re: Nanny State Britain
Originally Posted by dunroving
(Post 8263193)
First off, you don't really think he typed all this, do you? I reckon it's a cut and paste job off the internet ...
Second, it's all to do with relative risk. The risk back then of the occasional broken arm or drowning while running riot out in the wildies is far outweighed by the fact that today's Couch Kids (or "screenagers") are going to die prematurely in their thousands and cost the NHS far more because of type II diabetes, heart disease, etc., etc. than the occasional plaster cast in the old days. |
Re: Nanny State Britain
Originally Posted by mono
(Post 8264244)
But this is how the human race attempts to find balance. We go too far one way then too far the other. Hopefully we then work out the correct path ahead. In the past we were too relaxed and casual with how we did things and exposed children to too much risk and danger. Now we are going too far the other way but we will work it out in the long run. I certainly don't think though that we should just carry on as we were, hitting kids when they misbehave, letting them eat lead and fall off trampolines every weekend. Some progress is required surely.
Doesn't every generation do the old, 'In my day...', and 'Kids today....'? Kids get bad press I think, especially in Britain. Having worked with many of the buggers over several years, I think they are really just the same as they always were. Some are absolutely fantastic and some are little s***ts. |
Re: Nanny State Britain
Originally Posted by Tr1boy
(Post 8260156)
I strongly suggest you don't come to Oz then. :lol:
|
Re: Nanny State Britain
Originally Posted by Lionda
(Post 8260159)
I was told in the library I can take my laptop in but can't plug it in because of health and safety :confused:
|
Re: Nanny State Britain
Originally Posted by brits1
(Post 8265173)
You cannot take a mobile phone into our public swimming centre or into the library...HSE I was told...my Oh is in HSE he said "rubbish"....
I read a story yesterday in the newspaper, some man is suing BA as they don't allow men to sit next to kids on the plane. He was in the middle of his pregnant wife and a 12 year old boy and they made him move seats!!! :blink: |
Re: Nanny State Britain
Japan is just as bad..if not worse at times! Every couple of weeks the kindergarten I send the twins to has the mums doing workshops on how to correctly wash your hands.......a very deep sigh..........:huh:
|
Re: Nanny State Britain
Originally Posted by sammyz
(Post 8265438)
Japan is just as bad..if not worse at times! Every couple of weeks the kindergarten I send the twins to has the mums doing workshops on how to correctly wash your hands.......a very deep sigh..........:huh:
And they're not allowed to have snow ball fights in the play ground. What else is there to do in a couple of feet of snow? |
Re: Nanny State Britain
I remember teaching a class and a student was messing with the window. The bloody thing chopped the end of his finger off! After going a little green (me more so than him) we picked up the end of his poor finger (ok not me at all but I did watch in a supportive way) and he was rushed to hospital where they could not reattach it. Poor bugger.
Anyway, the windows weren't reinstalled as the school had been operating for generations and taught thousands of kids.....and he was the first to chop his finger off. It was an unfortunate freakish accident....but we were asked to open windows ourselves in the future! :) His best mate took him a box of cadbury's chocolate fingers to the hospital! |
Re: Nanny State Britain
Originally Posted by lilybilly101
(Post 8265069)
I agree.......it's a process.....and lots of progress has been made I believe. I really dislike the gloom and doom merchants who say this generation are ruined....it's rubbish. Kids get crap press.......there are plenty of teens doing wonderful things but we don't here about them!
Doesn't every generation do the old, 'In my day...', and 'Kids today....'? Kids get bad press I think, especially in Britain. Having worked with many of the buggers over several years, I think they are really just the same as they always were. Some are absolutely fantastic and some are little s***ts. |
Re: Nanny State Britain
Originally Posted by mono
(Post 8264244)
But this is how the human race attempts to find balance. We go too far one way then too far the other. Hopefully we then work out the correct path ahead. In the past we were too relaxed and casual with how we did things and exposed children to too much risk and danger. Now we are going too far the other way but we will work it out in the long run. I certainly don't think though that we should just carry on as we were, hitting kids when they misbehave, letting them eat lead and fall off trampolines every weekend. Some progress is required surely.
It exists in Australia too. I will price a job that should cost my customer $600, but by the time I allow for the men's Health & Safety components and permits etc, this price can treble.They accept this because they need the job done but it irks me when we are busy to have 3 men away for a full day to do a 2 hour job...... |
Re: Nanny State Britain
When I was in Italy there was young Children sitting on their parents friends laps, I instanatly thought this was strange and not natural....Then I thought NO" ....IT IS NOT STRANGE, IT IS NATURAL..no way would it happen in the UK..then again I have been brought up in Britain
|
Re: Nanny State Britain
On the government trying to police food, along with all the other problems, often the science of the day is wrong! There's plenty of debate about whether cholesterol is bad for everyone, and certainly at one point there was a spate of small children with health problems because their parents thought it would be good to feed them skim milk. Cholesterol is an important building block for the brain and nerves.
At one point eggs were evil, now they're admitting they're a good food, and as they're cheap they could be a very healthy boost for diets when money's tight. If they'd been able to follow scientific certainty decades ago they'd have tried to force everyone to eat margarine. They certainly convinced a whole lot of people it was good for them. And then, whoops, hydrogenated fats are lethal! Then carbohydrates were wonder food. Eat lots of bread and pasta, but just make sure to avoid fat. Might as well inject sugar into the bloodstream. And on, and on. But every time they're so so certain they're right. Bev |
Re: Nanny State Britain
Originally Posted by Bevm
(Post 8265990)
On the government trying to police food, along with all the other problems, often the science of the day is wrong! There's plenty of debate about whether cholesterol is bad for everyone, and certainly at one point there was a spate of small children with health problems because their parents thought it would be good to feed them skim milk. Cholesterol is an important building block for the brain and nerves.
At one point eggs were evil, now they're admitting they're a good food, and as they're cheap they could be a very healthy boost for diets when money's tight. If they'd been able to follow scientific certainty decades ago they'd have tried to force everyone to eat margarine. They certainly convinced a whole lot of people it was good for them. And then, whoops, hydrogenated fats are lethal! Then carbohydrates were wonder food. Eat lots of bread and pasta, but just make sure to avoid fat. Might as well inject sugar into the bloodstream. And on, and on. But every time they're so so certain they're right. Bev I certainly remember when you weren't supposed to have more than 2 eggs a week and margarine was the bee's knee's now both proven to be wrong. :blink: |
Re: Nanny State Britain
Originally Posted by Beedubya
(Post 8266005)
Couldn't agree more on this point Bev. I take absolutely no notice any longer of the good food/bad food scare stories in the paper, they change on a weekly basis.
I certainly remember when you weren't supposed to have more than 2 eggs a week and margarine was the bee's knee's now both proven to be wrong. :blink: A simple balanced diet with real food is the way. |
Re: Nanny State Britain
Originally Posted by lilybilly101
(Post 8265069)
I agree.......it's a process.....and lots of progress has been made I believe. I really dislike the gloom and doom merchants who say this generation are ruined....it's rubbish. Kids get crap press.......there are plenty of teens doing wonderful things but we don't here about them!
Doesn't every generation do the old, 'In my day...', and 'Kids today....'? Kids get bad press I think, especially in Britain. Having worked with many of the buggers over several years, I think they are really just the same as they always were. Some are absolutely fantastic and some are little s***ts. Those who get into the press, do so because they make 'good press' for the papers and 'good media' for television news. Kida doing well, doesnt make 'good news' for these people. There is a greater number of 'bad kids' with a more widespread and extreme form of 'badness' than 20 or 30 years ago. They have got worse. However, like you say there ia a large majority of great kids who are good citizens and contribute to society. Many of the kids I worked with in UK did community work including working voluntarily in hospices. Also the comment about young people being less healthy is correct. Too much time interacting with technology in 'virtual worlds' rather than real people in the real world. This has resulted in greater obesity and an inability to relate properly to the next generation up. and......... just dont get me on to the drinking habits of the young ....... baaaaah humbug!:frown: |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:26 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.