![]() |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
I'm not sure if soccer versus football has ever been discussed on BE?
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 11315982)
I'm not sure if soccer versus football has ever been discussed on BE?
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Not sure why soccer should be discussed. It is an English word, I am sure. My school certainly referred to it as soccer back in the 30s or earlier
There used to be a board in the Hall for the captains of all the sports teams, and soccer was there. |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by bigglesworth
(Post 11316139)
Not sure why soccer should be discussed. It is an English word, I am sure. My school certainly referred to it as soccer back in the 30s or earlier
There used to be a board in the Hall for the captains of all the sports teams, and soccer was there. I am not sure if the revulsion is caused by the word itself, or because the word "football" has been coopted in the US for a local debased form of rugby. :unsure: |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
I never hear football referred to as soccer here, either personally in Scotland or on telly. I have got strange looks before when I have reverted to the US "soccer" term. I think it is looked at as an outdated term these days - a bit like "rugger".
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by dunroving
(Post 11316184)
I never hear football referred to as soccer here, either personally in Scotland or on telly. I have got strange looks before when I have reverted to the US "soccer" term. I think it is looked at as an outdated term these days - a bit like "rugger".
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 11316195)
Yes, I would say outdated over there. Have never heard it used in the normal run of conversation.
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by dunroving
(Post 11316184)
I never hear football referred to as soccer here, either personally in Scotland or on telly. I have got strange looks before when I have reverted to the US "soccer" term. I think it is looked at as an outdated term these days - a bit like "rugger".
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Hmm. The plot thickens.
I have looked online, and the origin of soccer is defined as British late nineteenth century abbreviation of Association. HOWEVER, my ancient printed edition of the Complete Oxford has NO mention of soccer. My main complaint about the OED is that it includes too many words of uncertain origin. I would really be surprised if the word did exist but was not mentioned in the OED. Anyone have any better origin? |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by dunroving
(Post 11316184)
I never hear football referred to as soccer here, either personally in Scotland or on telly. I have got strange looks before when I have reverted to the US "soccer" term. I think it is looked at as an outdated term these days - a bit like "rugger".
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 11316195)
Yes, I would say outdated over there. Have never heard it used in the normal run of conversation.
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by bigglesworth
(Post 11316272)
Hmm. The plot thickens.
I have looked online, and the origin of soccer is defined as British late nineteenth century abbreviation of Association. HOWEVER, my ancient printed edition of the Complete Oxford has NO mention of soccer. My main complaint about the OED is that it includes too many words of uncertain origin. I would really be surprised if the word did exist but was not mentioned in the OED. Anyone have any better origin? |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Bit of a First World Problem we've got going on here :lol:
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 11316278)
No, this is correct. (Association versus Rugby.) I believe it is all laid out in the OED, 1998 print edition and online edition.
And it is not. More enlightenment needed. |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by bigglesworth
(Post 11316428)
But, if it were true (and I believed it was) surely, dating from the nineteenth century, it would have been in the 1930s edition as well as the 1971 edition?
And it is not. More enlightenment needed. |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11316213)
Interesting. Perhaps its adoption by the US also led to a reaction against that word in the UK. :unsure: I seem to remember it being widely used when I was at school, but unfortunately that was, er, several years ago now. :rolleyes:
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 11316542)
Used at my school by the Welsh games teachers for whom rugby was football.:lol:
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
The difference between Americans and the English is that Americans think 100 years is a long time and that the English think 100 miles is a long way!
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by bigglesworth
(Post 11316428)
But, if it were true (and I believed it was) surely, dating from the nineteenth century, it would have been in the 1930s edition as well as the 1971 edition?
And it is not. More enlightenment needed. |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by bigglesworth
(Post 11316428)
But, if it were true (and I believed it was) surely, dating from the nineteenth century, it would have been in the 1930s edition as well as the 1971 edition?
And it is not. More enlightenment needed. |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 11317027)
Hmm not sure how to explain that. I must admit I've only looked at the entry in the latest print ed (1998) and the online edition, which is basically the 1998 edition, updated continuously. When I get to the library I'll see if I can find a paper trail in older dictionaries...
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Really interesting article Novo. Thank you. Seem pretty conclusive, and very much in tune with everything one reads online.
So why did it NOT appear in between? It is not in my 1971 edition, which is the miniaturised full copy, and which I have always understood to be just an updated edition of the 1930s one, unlike the 1998 complete rewrite? Unfortunately, I will not be able to get into the Bodleian before the autumn. So Robin please let me know how you get on. |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by bigglesworth
(Post 11317135)
Really interesting article Novo. Thank you. Seem pretty conclusive, and very much in tune with everything one reads online.
So why did it NOT appear in between? It is not in my 1971 edition, which is the miniaturised full copy, and which I have always understood to be just an updated edition of the 1930s one, unlike the 1998 complete rewrite? Unfortunately, I will not be able to get into the Bodleian before the autumn. So Robin please let me know how you get on. |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 11317169)
I suppose we'd have to consult a library copy of the 1891 ed. to be sure, but perhaps "soccer" was merely mention as an abr. in the entry for Football or Association Football?
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
There have been a pile of programmes on British tv with 'soccer' in the title over the years including Soccer Sunday in the 70s and Soccer AM now. I'm sure we called it soccer at school in the 70s. (From an Aus perspective, I've never worked out why Aussie Rules is called football when they rarely touch the ball with their feet.
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 11318669)
....., I've never worked out why Aussie Rules is called football when they rarely touch the ball with their feet.
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
The UK doesn't have "y'all", or any equivalent; how do they manage? :lol:
I could revert to most British idiom and pronunciation fairly easily if I returned to the UK, but I suspect that "y'all" would be hard to drop for lack of an equivalent. :unsure: |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11318743)
The UK doesn't have "y'all", or any equivalent; how do they manage? :lol:
I could revert to most British idiom and pronunciation fairly easily if I returned to the UK, but I suspect that "y'all" would be hard to drop for lack of a replacement. :unsure: Y'all Wicked (wicked hot, wicked bad etc.) Liberry for library You guys, even when the group includes women. Dude |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 11318798)
wicked hot
(Ja'mie). |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 11318919)
Quiche.
(Ja'mie). "Real men don't eat quiche". |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by bigglesworth
(Post 11318992)
Come on!
"Real men don't eat quiche". |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11318743)
The UK doesn't have "y'all", or any equivalent; how do they manage? :lol:
HTH |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 11318798)
I use American when in England just to annoy folks.
Y'all Wicked (wicked hot, wicked bad etc.) Liberry for library You guys, even when the group includes women. Dude |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by windsong
(Post 11322673)
The only time I use "you guys" is when I address my dogs. Collectively, they are "you guys!". I haven't yet come up with a British equivalent unfortunately.
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 11322763)
"yous" is the nearest equivalent I can think of. But I think that it is a bit dialect restrictive.
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
My Englishman stumped me the first time he told me to be careful when turning left by the "central reservation on the dual carriageway" (we were in the car), and it took me awhile to realize he was talking about the "median" in the highway. It also annoys him when I call a tissue a "Kleenex," but thinks it's perfectly fine to "Hoover" instead of vacuum... :)
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 11322763)
"yous" is the nearest equivalent I can think of. But I think that it is a bit dialect restrictive.
You lot. |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by Pearlgirl
(Post 11322875)
My Englishman ...
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11322897)
You realize you can't own an Englishman, at least not a genuine one, don't you? :unsure:
|
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 11323163)
Oh come on. You're owned. I'm owned. Just go with the flow.
That can't be right. |
Re: Language Differences between USA and UK
Originally Posted by bigglesworth
(Post 11323479)
But surely that would mean one could buy "first prize in the lottery of life".
That can't be right. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 12:01 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.