Ex-pats and the single tier pension.
#16
Re: Ex-pats and the single tier pension.
OK. Deep breathe. Begin again.
My husband reaches state retirement age in 2017, after 6th April 2016 when the 'single tier' pension rules come into force. A previous pension forecast had told him that he had 30 years contributions which would have been sufficient for a full pension under the old rules, but you will need 35 years contributions to get a full single tier pension; so, we were anxious to make up the shortfall.
We've just got another pension forecast for him and realise that it is much more complicated than we realised because SERPS is being abolished under the new rules. That is the State Earnings Related Pension Supplement. But additionally anyone who was in a 'contracted out' pension scheme (mostly public employees) will have their pension reduced because they didn't pay SERPS contributions.
Under the old rules my husband will get a pension of £121.23 a week. That is the basic state pension of £113.10 plus £8.13 SERPS.
But, under the new, single-tier, rules he will only get £75.26 a week, which is only slightly more than half of the full single-tier rate of £148.40. This is not just because he has a shortfall of five years in contributions. Most of the reduction is because he was in a 'contracted out' pension scheme for most of his working life.
So, even if he made up the five missing years in Class 3 contributions, he would gain nothing because he would still get less under the new rules than he would get under the old. The rule is that you will get the higher of the two amounts.
The DWP advisors we have spoken to have said that in 2016 it will be possible to make up contributions, but the rules have not been published yet and we will have to wait and see whether he could benefit.
My husband reaches state retirement age in 2017, after 6th April 2016 when the 'single tier' pension rules come into force. A previous pension forecast had told him that he had 30 years contributions which would have been sufficient for a full pension under the old rules, but you will need 35 years contributions to get a full single tier pension; so, we were anxious to make up the shortfall.
We've just got another pension forecast for him and realise that it is much more complicated than we realised because SERPS is being abolished under the new rules. That is the State Earnings Related Pension Supplement. But additionally anyone who was in a 'contracted out' pension scheme (mostly public employees) will have their pension reduced because they didn't pay SERPS contributions.
Under the old rules my husband will get a pension of £121.23 a week. That is the basic state pension of £113.10 plus £8.13 SERPS.
But, under the new, single-tier, rules he will only get £75.26 a week, which is only slightly more than half of the full single-tier rate of £148.40. This is not just because he has a shortfall of five years in contributions. Most of the reduction is because he was in a 'contracted out' pension scheme for most of his working life.
So, even if he made up the five missing years in Class 3 contributions, he would gain nothing because he would still get less under the new rules than he would get under the old. The rule is that you will get the higher of the two amounts.
The DWP advisors we have spoken to have said that in 2016 it will be possible to make up contributions, but the rules have not been published yet and we will have to wait and see whether he could benefit.
Several times, people have posted about the change from 30 years to 35 years. Several times I have read replies to such posts saying "What are you complaining about? You will be better off under the new pension rules" This forecast indicates this is not necessarily true.
As others have indicated, the general message on the government sites seems to be, "You will not be worse off under the new pension than you would have been under the old pension". Hopefully that is true.
But as with all these things, I don't think we will know the full story until people actually start to receive a pension under the new scheme. I already received one pension forecast about 4 years ago, that is now out of date/incorrect. I just sent off a request for another one, so I'm interested to see what the new one says.
#17
Re: Ex-pats and the single tier pension.
I was thinking that, because as a woman I reach retirement age earlier than my husband, I was going to miss out, because he would get the new single tier pension, but I'd be stuck with the old scheme. In fact, it looks as if I'm in a better position than he is. If I defer taking my pension to 65, it will be higher than his -- not that it is a competition, but it is the opposite of what I expected.
#18
Re: Ex-pats and the single tier pension.
But as with all these things, I don't think we will know the full story until people actually start to receive a pension under the new scheme. I already received one pension forecast about 4 years ago, that is now out of date/incorrect. I just sent off a request for another one, so I'm interested to see what the new one says.
#19
Re: Ex-pats and the single tier pension.
When do you reach state pension date, Dunroving? As I understand it, they are rolling out new forecasts which include new world details a bit at a time. If you don't fall within those parameters, you might not get the new info yet, although you will get an update on your pension as far as the old system goes.
As they don't charge for a forecast and I haven't had one in 4 or 5 years, I thought it was worth getting another just to see what they say.
#20
Re: Ex-pats and the single tier pension.
If you look on the pension site, you'll see they are only giving forecasts for people born before April '55. Everyone else has to wait until 2016.
#21
Re: Ex-pats and the single tier pension.
It's sent now, anyway, so I'll let you know what happens.
#22
Re: Ex-pats and the single tier pension.
OK. I'll be interested in your forecast. I was surprised at how much of a reduction was made from the single-tier forecast for contracting out.
We've worked out that my husband was in contracted out schemes for 25 years out of 29 years employment in the UK. For some of that time he was also in non contracted out employment, which accounts for the amount of SERPS he has.
We've worked out that my husband was in contracted out schemes for 25 years out of 29 years employment in the UK. For some of that time he was also in non contracted out employment, which accounts for the amount of SERPS he has.
#23
Re: Ex-pats and the single tier pension.
What I meant was that you will be given the higher of the old style or the new style pensions. You don't get a choice, but it isn't determined by your date of birth either.
So my husband, for example, will get the old style pension, even though he reaches pension age in 2017, because his entitlement under the old rules is higher than under the new rules.
So my husband, for example, will get the old style pension, even though he reaches pension age in 2017, because his entitlement under the old rules is higher than under the new rules.
This is the first time I have seen anyone post an actual forecast indicating the possible effects of the new pension arrangements. I'm in a similar situation (will have 29 or 30 years when I reach retirement age and have largely works in jobs where I have paid into an occupational pension and therefore was contracted out of SERPS). I imagine many people on BE will be similar, was we seem to have largely people who have worked in professions that have occupational pension schemes (so they'd have been contacted out).
Several times, people have posted about the change from 30 years to 35 years. Several times I have read replies to such posts saying "What are you complaining about? You will be better off under the new pension rules" This forecast indicates this is not necessarily true.
As others have indicated, the general message on the government sites seems to be, "You will not be worse off under the new pension than you would have been under the old pension". Hopefully that is true.
But as with all these things, I don't think we will know the full story until people actually start to receive a pension under the new scheme. I already received one pension forecast about 4 years ago, that is now out of date/incorrect. I just sent off a request for another one, so I'm interested to see what the new one says.
Several times, people have posted about the change from 30 years to 35 years. Several times I have read replies to such posts saying "What are you complaining about? You will be better off under the new pension rules" This forecast indicates this is not necessarily true.
As others have indicated, the general message on the government sites seems to be, "You will not be worse off under the new pension than you would have been under the old pension". Hopefully that is true.
But as with all these things, I don't think we will know the full story until people actually start to receive a pension under the new scheme. I already received one pension forecast about 4 years ago, that is now out of date/incorrect. I just sent off a request for another one, so I'm interested to see what the new one says.
If you want a forecast based on the new rules, you have to wait, but they point out that it is still possible to get a forecast if you were born post April '55, and that it is still relevant, because (paraphrase) "in the vast majority of cases ... this estimate will be the least amount you will get under the new rules"
Which is I think essentially what I and Rebs said between us in posts 18 and 19.
#24
Re: Ex-pats and the single tier pension.
OK. I'll be interested in your forecast. I was surprised at how much of a reduction was made from the single-tier forecast for contracting out.
We've worked out that my husband was in contracted out schemes for 25 years out of 29 years employment in the UK. For some of that time he was also in non contracted out employment, which accounts for the amount of SERPS he has.
We've worked out that my husband was in contracted out schemes for 25 years out of 29 years employment in the UK. For some of that time he was also in non contracted out employment, which accounts for the amount of SERPS he has.
I think that people that only contributed to the State scheme might be a little annoyed if your OH got the same as they did in addition to a company pension when he had paid less into the system.
Your OH isn't losing out - he is just benefiting from a separate pension.
#25
Re: Ex-pats and the single tier pension.
Just out of interest - anyone know whether SERPS was a standard amount, and whether it resulted in a standard additional amount of state pension? Or was it (contribution) proportional to salary?
Additional, but different issue: One of the things I like about the US Social Security that is different than the UK state pension is that if you pay in more, you get more. In the UK, I pay a stack more in NI than many other people (including people who are not contracted out of SERPS), but I get the same (or even less) in state pension.
Additional, but different issue: One of the things I like about the US Social Security that is different than the UK state pension is that if you pay in more, you get more. In the UK, I pay a stack more in NI than many other people (including people who are not contracted out of SERPS), but I get the same (or even less) in state pension.
#26
Re: Ex-pats and the single tier pension.
Just out of interest - anyone know whether SERPS was a standard amount, and whether it resulted in a standard additional amount of state pension? Or was it (contribution) proportional to salary?
Additional, but different issue: One of the things I like about the US Social Security that is different than the UK state pension is that if you pay in more, you get more. In the UK, I pay a stack more in NI than many other people (including people who are not contracted out of SERPS), but I get the same (or even less) in state pension.
Additional, but different issue: One of the things I like about the US Social Security that is different than the UK state pension is that if you pay in more, you get more. In the UK, I pay a stack more in NI than many other people (including people who are not contracted out of SERPS), but I get the same (or even less) in state pension.
SERPS and the State Second Pension | nidirect
The current system is massively complex - loads of elements have come and gone over the years - additional pension, graduated pension, serps, sp2 - all sorts.
#27
Re: Ex-pats and the single tier pension.
I think it is proportional - State Earnings Related Pension Scheme ie based on earnings.
SERPS and the State Second Pension | nidirect
The current system is massively complex - loads of elements have come and gone over the years - additional pension, graduated pension, serps, sp2 - all sorts.
SERPS and the State Second Pension | nidirect
The current system is massively complex - loads of elements have come and gone over the years - additional pension, graduated pension, serps, sp2 - all sorts.
#28
Re: Ex-pats and the single tier pension.
Just to add to my above comment:
It has occurred to me that National Insurance is like the Schleswig-Holstein question: There are only three people who have ever understood it; one is dead, another went mad and the third has forgotten it.
It has occurred to me that National Insurance is like the Schleswig-Holstein question: There are only three people who have ever understood it; one is dead, another went mad and the third has forgotten it.