Same Sex Marriage.

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 24th 2014, 10:09 am
  #16  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
ian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Same Sex Marriage.

Originally Posted by Jerni
Thousands of couples AOS (many from VWP) and have zero issues, the few that do usually have some major red flag in their case that leads to the denial, not the VWP entry or any overstay.
Can you guarantee to this couple that things won't blow up in their face? Go ahead... make the guarantee! Otherwise, I suggest you not be so cavalier with someone else's life!

Ian
ian-mstm is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2014, 10:10 am
  #17  
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,558
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Same Sex Marriage.

Originally Posted by Jerni
I'm sorry but advising someone to go through a process that splits the couple apart and can take over a year to be processed is bad advice when they can make use of a perfectly legal, faster process (AOS) that would allow them to stay together during the process.

So long as the petitioner is a USC, the beneficiary entered legally and is not inadmissible due to some kind of criminal history AOS is just as 'guaranteed' as a K1/CR1 (they can be denied as well...)

Thousands of couples AOS (many from VWP) and have zero issues, the few that do usually have some major red flag in their case that leads to the denial, not the VWP entry or any overstay.
If you want to run the risk that's up to you, but advising someone else that "there is no risk" when that is factually incorrect, is unconscionable.
Pulaski is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2014, 10:13 am
  #18  
MODERATOR
 
Noorah101's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 58,687
Noorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Same Sex Marriage.

Originally Posted by Jerni
Thousands of couples AOS (many from VWP) and have zero issues, the few that do usually have some major red flag in their case that leads to the denial, not the VWP entry or any overstay.
Yes, that "red flag" exists when the Adjudicating Officer believes there was immigrant intent at the POE when the visit arrived on the VWP....further complicated by an overstay. There might not have been intent at the POE...but if the officer even thinks there might have been, the AOS can be denied.

Of course, whether a couple chooses to take that risk of AOS denial or not, is up to them. But it is in no way "guaranteed" to be approved. Personally, I'd rather spend 8 months apart and have less risk of a permanent ban from the USA. But that's just me.

See this link: http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=651746

Rene
Noorah101 is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2014, 10:16 am
  #19  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 250
Jerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Same Sex Marriage.

Originally Posted by ian-mstm
AOS from the VWP is allowed only if there was no intent to stay to adjust status upon entry to the US. You tell me... how do you prove there was no intent? Answer = you can't! End of story. There is also an additional complication here - she has already overstayed on the VWP, which sends the clear message that US immigration rules and regulations are of little value.

Overall, your advice is seriously flawed, and should be ignored. Why? Because if the AOS is denied for any reason whatsoever there is absolutely no recourse. Any rights she might otherwise have had were signed away when she entered the US on the VWP.

Ian
I disagree. As I posted elsewhere intent alone cannot be used as a reason to deny AOS. Plus, it is not up to the applicant to prove there was no intent, it is up to USCIS to prove there was. As you say that is extremely difficult which is why you'll find next to zero cases of AOS being denied solely due to intent.

As long as she is married to a USC, overstay is irrelevant.

There are also many hundreds of successful AOS from VWP on sites like VisaJourney. Trakkit has a 70 page thread on same-sex couples adjusting again many from long term VWP overstays.

As I posted, OP should have a consult with a lawyer, it would be unfair to themselves to dismiss AOS due to some misinformation.
Jerni is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2014, 10:17 am
  #20  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Michael's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 10,678
Michael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Same Sex Marriage.

Originally Posted by Jerni
Thousands of couples AOS (many from VWP) and have zero issues, the few that do usually have some major red flag in their case that leads to the denial, not the VWP entry or any overstay.
If there was "no risk", everybody would adjust status but yet thousands annually go the K-1/CR-1 route.

It also depends on which district they reside in. Several year ago, I believe 100% of people that entered on the vwp, overstayed, and adjusted status in the 9th district were denied the adjustment of status. I'm not sure how the 9th district is currently handling vwp overstays.
Michael is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2014, 10:21 am
  #21  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 250
Jerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Same Sex Marriage.

Originally Posted by Pulaski
If you want to run the risk that's up to you, but advising someone else that "there is no risk" when that is factually incorrect, is unconscionable.
Where did I say there was no risk?
Jerni is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2014, 10:22 am
  #22  
MODERATOR
 
Noorah101's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 58,687
Noorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Same Sex Marriage.

Originally Posted by Jerni
Plus, it is not up to the applicant to prove there was no intent, it is up to USCIS to prove there was.
I disagree. USCIS does not have to prove there was intent. All the officer has to do is believe there was.

As long as she is married to a USC, overstay is irrelevant.
I disagree again. Did you read the link I posted?

As I posted, OP should have a consult with a lawyer...
I agree.

Rene
Noorah101 is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2014, 10:24 am
  #23  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 250
Jerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Same Sex Marriage.

Originally Posted by Michael
If there was "no risk", everybody would adjust status but yet thousands annually go the K-1/CR-1 route.

It also depends on which district they reside in. Several year ago, I believe 100% of people that entered on the vwp, overstayed, and adjusted status in the 9th district were denied the adjustment of status. I'm not sure how the 9th district is currently handling vwp overstays.
It was an office in San Diego and they were told to stop denying them by USCIS.
Jerni is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2014, 10:24 am
  #24  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
ian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Same Sex Marriage.

Originally Posted by Jerni
I disagree.
I'm sure you do... I don't care! Your premise is faulty, therefore so are your conclusions.


There are also many hundreds of successful AOS from VWP on sites like VisaJourney.
Respectfully, I suggest you have found the source of your faulty premise.

Ian
ian-mstm is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2014, 10:26 am
  #25  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 250
Jerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond reputeJerni has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Same Sex Marriage.

Originally Posted by Noorah101
I disagree. USCIS does not have to prove there was intent. All the officer has to do is believe there was.


I disagree again. Did you read the link I posted?


I agree.

Rene
It's all in the USCIS Adjudicators Field Manual.
Jerni is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2014, 10:31 am
  #26  
MODERATOR
 
Noorah101's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 58,687
Noorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Same Sex Marriage.

Originally Posted by Jerni
It's all in the USCIS Adjudicators Field Manual.
OK. Now that the OP has heard both sides of the coin, it is up to them to consult with an immigration attorney and follow the path they choose.

I'm closing this thread, as it will just become a back and forth pro-con VWP to AOS discussion, of which there are already plenty.

Rene
Moderator
Noorah101 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.