HunterGreen

That's all good and nice, but if you're so right then I don't think you'll have a problem answering my question in my earlier post.

MightBe

My apologies HunterGreen I did not think you question was serious. To get the changes made would require some legislation, People using this method would know in advance that hole was blocked. Of course that may effect the genuine spur of the moment marriages but that could be blocked easily by the marriage licence issuer being unable to issue a licence without seeing the appropiate K-1 visa. and K-3 would just be for marriage taking place out of the US. But surely it has sunk in now that the USCIS have no great problem with visa waiver marriages.

crg14624 That really is a crock of nonsense, The people who get refused entry are more likely to be K-1 users who travel across on a regular basic
and lets be honest most visa waiver marriages are not done on such a grand scale, more likely very low key affairs.
PS. I have not just got off the boat you know.

crg

I don't know where the venom came from. You're the one advocating that people commit illegal acts.

What gives you the impression that this is an illegal immigration help forum? Most of the people on here have navigated the system legally and aren't here to encourage or advise people to circumvent the law. Since they went through the time, money, and energy to immigrate properly, they probably look down on those who don't.

When someone takes your advice and gets ordered removed, then it's your fault.

Encouraging someone to circumvent the law as you describe is a violation of sections 274 of the INA and 8 USC 1324, which is a federal felony.

Just because there is only a 0.0000001% chance that you will be prosecuted for your "advice" doesn't mean you aren't committing a felony by your actions.

I didn't just get off the boat either, but I've put people back on the boat.

HunterGreen

So you're admitting it's a method, and if it was blocked they'd know in advance. Which takes all the non-intent out of it right there and then.

Again, that doesn't mean that it doesn't remain against the law. Along the same lines, I totally agree with what crg said: Just because there is only a 0.0000001% chance that you will be prosecuted for your "advice" doesn't mean you aren't committing a felony by your actions.