Marriage on Tourist Visa, etc
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Not all marriages are shams
what are you saying?we should not marry for love. Ian
Rete wrote:
>> That which you call "true love" is an illusion. In order to exist,
>> true love must be completely selfless - and to live and exist
>[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
>> Ian
>
>And from which book did you gleam this bull or is it an original
>thought?
>
Rete wrote:
>> That which you call "true love" is an illusion. In order to exist,
>> true love must be completely selfless - and to live and exist
>[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
>> Ian
>
>And from which book did you gleam this bull or is it an original
>thought?
>
#62
Account Closed
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
Re: Not all marriages are shams
Before you toss this off as "bull", you should try existing solely for another person. I guarantee that you will eventually destroy yourself. It's a very difficult thing to do... exist for someone else... never a thought for yourself or your own well-being - never, not once! Eventually, when there's nothing left... when you're totally spent, you'll realize the truth.
Oh... wait, were you talking about true love being an illusion? I believe it is. Why? Because true love is selfless... and to deny the self... well, you get the idea. JMHO.
Ian
Oh... wait, were you talking about true love being an illusion? I believe it is. Why? Because true love is selfless... and to deny the self... well, you get the idea. JMHO.
Ian
#63
Account Closed
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
Re: Not all marriages are shams
Ian
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Not all marriages are shams
thanks Ian,no i did not lie.And I plan parties for a living and some time i
can get a little throwed off.you are not the only person i was typing with.i
hope we are on the same side.i try not to get to affended when i feel like
i'm being insulted.
ian-mstm wrote:
>> what are you saying?we should not marry for love. Ian
>>
>[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> >And from which book did you gleam this bull or is it an original
>> >thought?
>
>A while back, you indicated that you understood what I was saying. You
>said, "ok, i think i follow you.". So, either you lied when you said
>that, or you think Rete's made some sort of point and you want in on the
>action! Either way, I didn't say anything about not marrying for love.
>My comment, in fact, had nothing whatsoever to do with marriage! Perhaps
>you missed that!
>
>Ian
can get a little throwed off.you are not the only person i was typing with.i
hope we are on the same side.i try not to get to affended when i feel like
i'm being insulted.
ian-mstm wrote:
>> what are you saying?we should not marry for love. Ian
>>
>[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> >And from which book did you gleam this bull or is it an original
>> >thought?
>
>A while back, you indicated that you understood what I was saying. You
>said, "ok, i think i follow you.". So, either you lied when you said
>that, or you think Rete's made some sort of point and you want in on the
>action! Either way, I didn't say anything about not marrying for love.
>My comment, in fact, had nothing whatsoever to do with marriage! Perhaps
>you missed that!
>
>Ian
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Not all marriages are shams
Hi Ian.If you don't can you please trust me to ask.What happen in your
marraige.A lot of the things that we type are just short versions of what we
think or our opions.i think we all have a story to tell.can you please share
again.If you don't mind.i just want to type with you.So fully we can
understand each other.
ian-mstm wrote:
>> And from which book did you gleam this bull or is it an original
>> thought?
>
>Before you toss this off as "bull", you should try existing solely for
>another person. I guarantee that you will eventually destroy yourself.
>It's a very difficult thing to do... exist for someone else... never a
>thought for yourself or your own well-being - never, not once!
>Eventually, when there's nothing left... when you're totally spent,
>you'll realize the truth.
>
>Oh... wait, were you talking about true love being an illusion? I
>believe it is. Why? Because true love is selfless... and to deny the
>self... well, you get the idea. JMHO.
>
>Ian
marraige.A lot of the things that we type are just short versions of what we
think or our opions.i think we all have a story to tell.can you please share
again.If you don't mind.i just want to type with you.So fully we can
understand each other.
ian-mstm wrote:
>> And from which book did you gleam this bull or is it an original
>> thought?
>
>Before you toss this off as "bull", you should try existing solely for
>another person. I guarantee that you will eventually destroy yourself.
>It's a very difficult thing to do... exist for someone else... never a
>thought for yourself or your own well-being - never, not once!
>Eventually, when there's nothing left... when you're totally spent,
>you'll realize the truth.
>
>Oh... wait, were you talking about true love being an illusion? I
>believe it is. Why? Because true love is selfless... and to deny the
>self... well, you get the idea. JMHO.
>
>Ian
#66
Account Closed
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
Re: Not all marriages are shams
So, to quote Forrest Gump, "that's all I have to say about that!"
Ian
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Not all marriages are shams
okay!
ian-mstm wrote:
>> Hi Ian.If you don't can you please trust me to ask.What happen in your
>> marraige.A lot of the things that we type are just short versions of
>[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>> >
>> >Ian
>
>I will say this - just so there's no confusion for any of the long-time
>posters on the forum - any comments I have made in the last few days
>relating to "true love", were in relation to my first marriage... not my
>current marriage!
>
>So, to quote Forrest Gump, "that's all I have to say about that!"
>
>Ian
ian-mstm wrote:
>> Hi Ian.If you don't can you please trust me to ask.What happen in your
>> marraige.A lot of the things that we type are just short versions of
>[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>> >
>> >Ian
>
>I will say this - just so there's no confusion for any of the long-time
>posters on the forum - any comments I have made in the last few days
>relating to "true love", were in relation to my first marriage... not my
>current marriage!
>
>So, to quote Forrest Gump, "that's all I have to say about that!"
>
>Ian
#68
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 157
Re: Marriage on Tourist Visa, etc
right,but never tried it.but i did here it was stonger there than it is here
in the ststes.more pointent.
Ray wrote:
>> yeah but i'm not there yet.i do think jamaica is a beautiful country
>> country.
>[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>> >and
>> >family support in their home country to be with you.
>
>Good place for the ganja .....allegedly
in the ststes.more pointent.
Ray wrote:
>> yeah but i'm not there yet.i do think jamaica is a beautiful country
>> country.
>[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>> >and
>> >family support in their home country to be with you.
>
>Good place for the ganja .....allegedly
Marriage by its definition is tool personal. Whether is is a real marriage or a sham marriage. Beyond navigating the whole immigration process, I have tangled my family, (daughter, mother, father, and etc) with someone who I am using, this would take major cohones. So I think that the fraudulent marriages are not common and the ones who commit them have some major ones.
#69
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Marriage on Tourist Visa, etc
I never have been to Canada,but one day I may.I just hate see and know that
there are people out there who do use people to get a visa.Now I don't know
where your are from and I do hope we are on the same page.Marriage is is a
union from God,and he gives us favor,not a visa.
Epitomee2000 wrote:
>> right,but never tried it.but i did here it was stonger there than it
>> is here
>[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> >
>> >Good place for the ganja .....allegedly
>
>We are not ganga smokers, but Jamaica is a less complicated existence.
>I had an epiphany, if for whatever reason, the USA became intolerable to
>live in and the only thing I could do is to immigrate to somewhere like
>Canada, I could not imagine myself marrying someone just for the
>immigration status.
>
>Marriage by its definition is tool personal. Whether is is a real
>marriage or a sham marriage. Beyond navigating the whole immigration
>process, I have tangled my family, (daughter, mother, father, and etc)
>with someone who I am using, this would take major cohones. So I think
>that the fraudulent marriages are not common and the ones who commit
>them have some major ones.
there are people out there who do use people to get a visa.Now I don't know
where your are from and I do hope we are on the same page.Marriage is is a
union from God,and he gives us favor,not a visa.
Epitomee2000 wrote:
>> right,but never tried it.but i did here it was stonger there than it
>> is here
>[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> >
>> >Good place for the ganja .....allegedly
>
>We are not ganga smokers, but Jamaica is a less complicated existence.
>I had an epiphany, if for whatever reason, the USA became intolerable to
>live in and the only thing I could do is to immigrate to somewhere like
>Canada, I could not imagine myself marrying someone just for the
>immigration status.
>
>Marriage by its definition is tool personal. Whether is is a real
>marriage or a sham marriage. Beyond navigating the whole immigration
>process, I have tangled my family, (daughter, mother, father, and etc)
>with someone who I am using, this would take major cohones. So I think
>that the fraudulent marriages are not common and the ones who commit
>them have some major ones.