k1 to permanent resident timeline q's
#1
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 12
k1 to permanent resident timeline q's
just looking for people to share their experiences and timescales on their greencard journey.
The i-485 was received november 30th 2001 along with permit to work and advanced parole
biometrics completed december 22nd 2011
i've checked USCIS and been accepted for work permit and advanced parole (just awaiting the card)
received notice on january 6th 2012 that my i-485 application had been transferred to california service centre
Just wondering what the rest of the timeline looks like untill i receive my greencard
Thanks in advance
The i-485 was received november 30th 2001 along with permit to work and advanced parole
biometrics completed december 22nd 2011
i've checked USCIS and been accepted for work permit and advanced parole (just awaiting the card)
received notice on january 6th 2012 that my i-485 application had been transferred to california service centre
Just wondering what the rest of the timeline looks like untill i receive my greencard
Thanks in advance
#2
Re: k1 to permanent resident timeline q's
Six month seems to be the average timeline from filing AOS to getting green card in hand. So, since you filed in December 2011 (I assume 2001 was a typo, lol), you should be getting either an AOS interview letter OR your green card directly (without an interview) around June 2012.
Rene
Rene
#3
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 12
Re: k1 to permanent resident timeline q's
lol yes 2001 was a typo, definately meant 2011!
ok that sounds great, thanks
is the interview done on a random basis or do some applicants not need one?
ok that sounds great, thanks
is the interview done on a random basis or do some applicants not need one?
#4
Re: k1 to permanent resident timeline q's
Having the I-485 sent to the CSC rather than to a District Office is an indication that an interview may not be needed. If, after reviewing the submission, the CSC agrees that an interview is not needed it will approve the application and order the green card. So your wait may be less than 6 months.
Regards, JEff
Regards, JEff
#6
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 12
Re: k1 to permanent resident timeline q's
hi there, im just querying again because ive still heard nothing more as of yet and my case status stillshows initial review, is it normal to experience this and is there any way i can hurry them along?
#7
Re: k1 to permanent resident timeline q's
Case status will show 'initial review' until a decision has been made or an RFE issued. It makes the whole idea of "tracking" a case meaningless. It's like watching a race where the view is blocked out from the time the starting gun has been fired until the finish line has been crossed. Everything in between the start and the finish is 'initial review', unless the racer runs off the course (RFE).
Regards, JEff
Regards, JEff
#8
Re: k1 to permanent resident timeline q's
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/processingTimesDisplay.do
I find it odd that the I-485 for marriage based cases is listed in the Field Office listing, rather than the Service Center listings. And, of course, even on the USCIS website, nothing is written in stone, and your case processing can vary from what they expect to be true.
Rene
#9
Re: k1 to permanent resident timeline q's
I don't find it odd at all. Most marriage-based adjustment of status applications are processed by the field offices, only a relative few bypass the field offices and get processed by the CSC.
Regards, JEff
Regards, JEff
#10
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 12
Re: k1 to permanent resident timeline q's
my case was apparently transferred to CSC in january, does anybody know the processing timeframe they have there and should i be concerned?
thanks
thanks
#12
Re: k1 to permanent resident timeline q's
I don't think there is an established processing timeframe, because having an I-485 processed by the CSC without an interview is not the standard practice. It's an 'exception to the rule', so to speak.
I think Moxie have you a good answer based on the current anecdotal evidence.
Regards, JEff
I think Moxie have you a good answer based on the current anecdotal evidence.
Regards, JEff