jstott1

Please give me your opinion which would be faster. I have a current I-129f at NSC with 1st NOA on 10/3/2002, or I could just do the marriage in Brazil and go with the DCF for the I-130. Which would be faster and less painless? Thanks for your experiences in this.

Trev

As a rule, I think that DCF is usually quicker. I just did DCF in New
Zealand and the whole process lasted between 4-6 weeks. My husband now has
a visa to enter the US.

I don't have any knowledge of Brazil, but you might check out this website
for personal experience, additional info. http://k1.exit.com/dcf.html
Choose Experiences on the menu bar and then Brazil.

Good Luck
Amy

"jstott1" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
    > Please give me your opinion which would be faster. I have a current
    > I-129f at NSC with 1st NOA on 10/3/2002, or I could just do the marriage
    > in Brazil and go with the DCF for the I-130. Which would be faster and
    > less painless? Thanks for your experiences in this.
    > --
    > Posted via http://britishexpats.com

Mrtravel

DCF is almost always better.


jstott1 wrote:
    >
    > Please give me your opinion which would be faster. I have a current
    > I-129f at NSC with 1st NOA on 10/3/2002, or I could just do the marriage
    > in Brazil and go with the DCF for the I-130. Which would be faster and
    > less painless? Thanks for your experiences in this.
    >
    > --
    > Posted via http://britishexpats.com

Cloweii

If you have been divorced then you want to go the K1 route, because you need a
lawyer to present your case to a Brazilian judge. This is just to get a
marriage license there.

Brad