Yiddo!
#3
BE user by choice









Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,854
From: A Briton, married to a Canadian, now in Fredericton.











It's an interesting thought that anyone would try to get them to stop it? I have been to lots of Spurs matches (don't understand a thing, but went out with someone who did, and then our Company got a box at Spurs) and was amazed at some of the chants, they were so fast and funny...and not so politically correct! Most 'old' teams for anything, be it ice hockey or football (cricket?) would have started with some form of religious affiliation wouldn't they?
Last edited by MillieF; Sep 17th 2013 at 5:37 am. Reason: Odd tense
#5
David Badiel had this to say on it:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...race-hate-word
No idea personally. It is true that within some groups (homosexuals and blacks, for example) the in-group are able to use former-derogatory terms in an ironic-proud way that the out-group is unable to use. It seems slightly hypocritical, but I suppose there is a logic somewhere.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...race-hate-word
No idea personally. It is true that within some groups (homosexuals and blacks, for example) the in-group are able to use former-derogatory terms in an ironic-proud way that the out-group is unable to use. It seems slightly hypocritical, but I suppose there is a logic somewhere.
#6
A tricky debate.
When Spurs fans use it it is non offensive. It does however bring the worst out of other fans who try to taunt on the jewish connection. This does not bother Tottenham fans but it does bother David Badiel when the person sitting next to him is taunting jews because he is one.
All that being said they are trying to dumb down football crowds to the mundane atmosphere of a North American sports arena. I hope it does not get that far.
When Spurs fans use it it is non offensive. It does however bring the worst out of other fans who try to taunt on the jewish connection. This does not bother Tottenham fans but it does bother David Badiel when the person sitting next to him is taunting jews because he is one.
All that being said they are trying to dumb down football crowds to the mundane atmosphere of a North American sports arena. I hope it does not get that far.
#7
A tricky debate.
When Spurs fans use it it is non offensive. It does however bring the worst out of other fans who try to taunt on the jewish connection. This does not bother Tottenham fans but it does bother David Badiel when the person sitting next to him is taunting jews because he is one.
When Spurs fans use it it is non offensive. It does however bring the worst out of other fans who try to taunt on the jewish connection. This does not bother Tottenham fans but it does bother David Badiel when the person sitting next to him is taunting jews because he is one.
#8
A tricky debate.
When Spurs fans use it it is non offensive. It does however bring the worst out of other fans who try to taunt on the jewish connection. This does not bother Tottenham fans but it does bother David Badiel when the person sitting next to him is taunting jews because he is one.
All that being said they are trying to dumb down football crowds to the mundane atmosphere of a North American sports arena. I hope it does not get that far.
When Spurs fans use it it is non offensive. It does however bring the worst out of other fans who try to taunt on the jewish connection. This does not bother Tottenham fans but it does bother David Badiel when the person sitting next to him is taunting jews because he is one.
All that being said they are trying to dumb down football crowds to the mundane atmosphere of a North American sports arena. I hope it does not get that far.
#9
David Badiel had this to say on it:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...race-hate-word
No idea personally. It is true that within some groups (homosexuals and blacks, for example) the in-group are able to use former-derogatory terms in an ironic-proud way that the out-group is unable to use. It seems slightly hypocritical, but I suppose there is a logic somewhere.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...race-hate-word
No idea personally. It is true that within some groups (homosexuals and blacks, for example) the in-group are able to use former-derogatory terms in an ironic-proud way that the out-group is unable to use. It seems slightly hypocritical, but I suppose there is a logic somewhere.
It is a bit tricky isn't it... It feels as though words like "nigger" and "queer" have now acquired a far greater impact due to the sort of linguistic prohibition that's been applied to them in recent times. I now wince when hearing these terms used in almost any context, whereas growing up in the 70s these words and others were so ubiquitous as to be virtually meaningless (to a white, heterosexual anyway).
I don't wish to use the terms myself, but sometimes wonder, if by making these words sacred, as we seem to have done, have we just made them all the more powerful?
Last edited by cjones; Sep 18th 2013 at 8:03 pm.
#10
Undoubtedly those words were not meaningless to those whom the words described, and that has led to the quasi-prohibition. Having said that, listen to any rap or hip-hop and you do wonder what all the fuss is about!
"Queer" has nowhere near the derogatory impact it used to have, as evidenced for instance by the TV program "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" and indeed the word "gay" has for all intents been divorced from its original meaning.
"Queer" has nowhere near the derogatory impact it used to have, as evidenced for instance by the TV program "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" and indeed the word "gay" has for all intents been divorced from its original meaning.
#11
Yid is not being reclaimed in the manner of nigger or queer. Yid has evolved and no longer means only "Jew" but also "Tottenham supporter, probably Jewish", Jermaine Defoe, for example, is a yiddo but he's not Jewish. If one wanted to refer to the fact of someone being Jewish in a mildly derogatory fashion one might use "binnie" of "fourbe".
This piece amused me, especially the description of Brian May:
http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-deb...otic-bandwagon
This piece amused me, especially the description of Brian May:
http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-deb...otic-bandwagon
#12
Yid is not being reclaimed in the manner of nigger or queer. Yid has evolved and no longer means only "Jew" but also "Tottenham supporter, probably Jewish", Jermaine Defoe, for example, is a yiddo but he's not Jewish. If one wanted to refer to the fact of someone being Jewish in a mildly derogatory fashion one might use "binnie" of "fourbe".
This piece amused me, especially the description of Brian May:
http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-deb...otic-bandwagon
This piece amused me, especially the description of Brian May:
http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-deb...otic-bandwagon
No idea about Yids or Yiddery or football for that matter. Football chanting is an issue only slightly above badgers in importance IMO.
#13
Undoubtedly those words were not meaningless to those whom the words described, and that has led to the quasi-prohibition. Having said that, listen to any rap or hip-hop and you do wonder what all the fuss is about!
"Queer" has nowhere near the derogatory impact it used to have, as evidenced for instance by the TV program "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" and indeed the word "gay" has for all intents been divorced from its original meaning.
"Queer" has nowhere near the derogatory impact it used to have, as evidenced for instance by the TV program "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" and indeed the word "gay" has for all intents been divorced from its original meaning.
#15
Binned by Muderators










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,708
From: White Rock BC











As ever, it is not the words that are used that are offensive, it is the intention behind them.
Making monkey noises at black players is definitely not on. However, during a derby game calling Millwall fans knuckle draggers, Brighton fans gayboys, Palace fans stripey nigels, Spurs fans yids or Man U fans w*nk*rs is pretty much OK in my view. It is just banter, nobody believes it is true (OK, maybe not the case for Man U), it is just to wind the other fans up. It is also largely consensual. You know what you are going to get at a football match. In some games I have been to the banter between fans was much more entertaining that the football.
Making monkey noises at black players is definitely not on. However, during a derby game calling Millwall fans knuckle draggers, Brighton fans gayboys, Palace fans stripey nigels, Spurs fans yids or Man U fans w*nk*rs is pretty much OK in my view. It is just banter, nobody believes it is true (OK, maybe not the case for Man U), it is just to wind the other fans up. It is also largely consensual. You know what you are going to get at a football match. In some games I have been to the banter between fans was much more entertaining that the football.




