British Expats
Page 6 of 52
« First
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
16
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Maple Leaf (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/)
-   -   World Cup (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/world-cup-670118/)

Auld Yin Jun 11th 2010 3:55 am
Re: World Cup
 
You've got to love it when the underdog, number 83 in the world, does so well against number 17.

Now if only the 14th can do as well and stick it to number 8 tomorrow it may help shut up some of the whining Sassenach complainers on this site.

Go USA.

dbd33 Jun 11th 2010 4:01 am
Re: World Cup
 
Originally Posted by Auld Yin (Post 8626771)
You've got to love it when the underdog, number 83 in the world, does so well against number 17.

Now if only the 14th can do as well and stick it to number 8 tomorrow it may help shut up some of the whining Sassenach complainers on this site.

Go USA.
#8's Argentina, innit?

Oink Jun 11th 2010 4:02 am
Re: World Cup
 
That was not a very good game. South Africa looked like school kids playing and they were lucky they didn't get hammered. And those incessant trumpets are really irritating as well. I thought the BBC were going to get FIFA to ban those for the World Cup?

Novocastrian Jun 11th 2010 4:06 am
Re: World Cup
 
Originally Posted by Oink (Post 8626783)
That was not a very good game. South Africa looked like school kids playing and they were lucky they didn't get hammered. And those incessant trumpets are really irritating as well. I thought the BBC were going to get FIFA to ban those for the World Cup?
Even assuming you're joking, I disagree. I thought it was very entertaining.

The SA goalie made a couple of superb saves but they should've had a penalty. Betcha tomorrow's match won't be so much fun.

Partially discharged Jun 11th 2010 4:11 am
Re: World Cup
 
Originally Posted by Oink (Post 8626663)
On another note the CBC analysis is just dreadful, they should stick talking about their crap sports and just put on the BBC or ITV feed.
:( Yawn......Keep in mind that Canada didn't qualify and that the BBC/ITV feed can be very jingoistic at times with the likes of twunts like Ian Wright and bland analysts like Alan 'King of the Geordie Nation' Shearer giving their indepth :eek: analysis. The commentary we are getting is from the 'world' feed in english with 'english' announcers...just not those annointed by the BBC/ITV.

Be thankful we don't only have the ESPN radio feed consisting of Tommy 'bulge in the old onion bag' Smyth.

Some people can never be pleased.

Oink Jun 11th 2010 4:13 am
Re: World Cup
 
Originally Posted by Novocastrian (Post 8626787)
Even assuming you're joking, I disagree. I thought it was very entertaining.

The SA goalie made a couple of superb saves but they should've had a penalty. Betcha tomorrow's match won't be so much fun.
The game was played at a very poor level by both sides. I appreciate that the pressure of the opening match may have got to many of the players, but imo it was a crap game.

Partially discharged Jun 11th 2010 4:13 am
Re: World Cup
 
Originally Posted by Oink (Post 8626783)
those incessant trumpets are really irritating as well. I thought the BBC were going to get FIFA to ban those for the World Cup?
I agree with you there....I'd have the trumpets banned....however it may not be politically correct as those trumpets are part of SA footie 'culture'....apparently trumpets were given out to all ticket holders, so it may not be just for the SA games....:eek: We'll have to see if the France/Uruguay game has loads of them.

Novocastrian Jun 11th 2010 4:16 am
Re: World Cup
 
Originally Posted by Oink (Post 8626802)
The game was played at a very poor level by both sides. I appreciate that the pressure of the opening match may have got to many of the players, but imo it was a crap game.
I blame the ball. It's too bouncy.

Oink Jun 11th 2010 4:18 am
Re: World Cup
 
Originally Posted by Partially discharged (Post 8626797)
:( Yawn......Keep in mind that Canada didn't qualify and that the BBC/ITV feed can be very jingoistic at times with the likes of twunts like Ian Wright and bland analysts like Alan 'King of the Geordie Nation' Shearer giving their indepth :eek: analysis. The commentary we are getting is from the 'world' feed in english with 'english' announcers...just not those annointed by the BBC/ITV.

Be thankful we don't only have the ESPN radio feed consisting of Tommy 'bulge in the old onion bag' Smyth.

Some people can never be pleased.
I thought the game commentary was okay, although I think the commentator was biased to SA, but given it goes around the world it's not surprising. It's the CBC bits, before, at half time and the wrap up which is complete crap and its just shows how little understanding Canadians have for football.

Novocastrian Jun 11th 2010 4:25 am
Re: World Cup
 
Originally Posted by Oink (Post 8626813)
I thought the game commentary was okay, although I think the commentator was biased to SA, but given it goes around the world it's not surprising. It's the CBC bits, before, at half time and the wrap up which is complete crap and its just shows how little understanding Canadians have for football.
You're an expert on all this stuff. What's the earliest stage of the competition that North Korea could meet South Korea?

It'd make a great final.

SDDep Jun 11th 2010 4:33 am
Re: World Cup
 
Originally Posted by Partially discharged (Post 8626797)
:( Yawn......Keep in mind that Canada didn't qualify and that the BBC/ITV feed can be very jingoistic at times with the likes of twunts like Ian Wright and bland analysts like Alan 'King of the Geordie Nation' Shearer giving their indepth :eek: analysis. The commentary we are getting is from the 'world' feed in english with 'english' announcers...just not those annointed by the BBC/ITV.

Be thankful we don't only have the ESPN radio feed consisting of Tommy 'bulge in the old onion bag' Smyth.

Some people can never be pleased.
hey now..no dissing alan shearer...even if he is a geordie:D

dbd33 Jun 11th 2010 4:37 am
Re: World Cup
 
Originally Posted by Oink (Post 8626813)
I thought the game commentary was okay, although I think the commentator was biased to SA, but given it goes around the world it's not surprising. It's the CBC bits, before, at half time and the wrap up which is complete crap and its just shows how little understanding Canadians have for football.
But commentary doesn't add anything to sport, it's just there to make the commentators important. As long as there has to be someone speaking I'd like in to be Don Cherry. Until then, will watch as many games as possible in pubs without sound.

Auld Yin Jun 11th 2010 4:43 am
Re: World Cup
 
Originally Posted by Oink (Post 8626813)
I thought the game commentary was okay, although I think the commentator was biased to SA, but given it goes around the world it's not surprising. It's the CBC bits, before, at half time and the wrap up which is complete crap and its just shows how little understanding Canadians have for football.
Easily solved for you. Don't watch the CBC bits and your BP will much improve.

Alan2005 Jun 11th 2010 4:45 am
Re: World Cup
 
Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 8626845)
But commentary doesn't add anything to sport, it's just there to make the commentators important. As long as there has to be someone speaking I'd like in to be Don Cherry. Until then, will watch as many games as possible in pubs without sound.
I disagree. Commentary when it's done well gives context and interpretation to events. Not everyone is an expert.

Auld Yin Jun 11th 2010 4:46 am
Re: World Cup
 
Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 8626780)
#8's Argentina, innit?
Not according to FIFA/Coca-Cola World Ranking website. Argentina is #7 followed by England at #8.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 12:50 pm.
Page 6 of 52
« First
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
16
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.