Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Canada > The Maple Leaf
Reload this Page >

Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 5th 2010, 6:24 pm
  #46  
Lowering the tone
 
Jingsamichty's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 7,377
Jingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

Originally Posted by jimf
I don't normally get into the position of defending the payment of benefits, but here goes....
The benefit system will top up low incomes whether or not there is a minimum wage. The wage and benefit issues are separate. Wage is determined by the market and benefit level determined by the government of the day as elected by the people.

Community service - if a genuine service is needed then there should be a job in place to provide that service already. Otherwise it smacks of something like detention at school - stay behind for an hour picking up litter for breaking some rule. If you've lost your job ad are genuinely looking for work it doesn't help to have to go and do the same sorts of things people do when they've just missed a prison sentence.
So there we have it... at the first suggestion of cutting benefits, or of making people actually contribute something in return, the typical reaction is one of resistance.

One man's "brood of lazy, sponging layabouts" is another man's "hard-working family in tough times."

Perhaps that answers the question posed in the thread title.

Last edited by Jingsamichty; Oct 5th 2010 at 6:26 pm.
Jingsamichty is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2010, 6:46 pm
  #47  
BE Forum Addict
 
jimf's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,340
jimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
So there we have it... at the first suggestion of cutting benefits, or of making people actually contribute something in return, the typical reaction is one of resistance.

One man's "brood of lazy, sponging layabouts" is another man's "hard-working family in tough times."

Perhaps that answers the question posed in the thread title.
I'm all for cutting down the welfare bill the challenge is how to do it fairly. The reality is that spongers and genuine both exist. I wouldn't particularly want to see the genuine punished or humiliated by having to sweep the streets in return for receiving any benefits. I see that today there is something in the news about bankers awarding themselves 7billion in bonuses - is it any wonder that people at the bottom try to cheat the system when those at the top get away with this sort of thing?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...lion-year.html
jimf is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2010, 7:02 pm
  #48  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,227
Alan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
So there we have it... at the first suggestion of cutting benefits, or of making people actually contribute something in return, the typical reaction is one of resistance.

One man's "brood of lazy, sponging layabouts" is another man's "hard-working family in tough times."

Perhaps that answers the question posed in the thread title.
There will always be both types claiming benefits - whatever level you set there will be people who think it is enough and won't work. Society needs to decide how many of these people it will accept vs how many people it wants to help and reach a compromise between the two.

There are also various tax schemes that remove the need for benefits - a citizens wage for instance which covers basic subsistence living and no more. Everyone gets it, and then you pay tax on what you earn above that. Not sure if I agree with this or not, but it's one of those ideas I read about on occasion.
Alan2005 is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2010, 8:02 pm
  #49  
BE Forum Addict
 
Posidrive's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Flat Oxfordshire
Posts: 1,709
Posidrive has a reputation beyond reputePosidrive has a reputation beyond reputePosidrive has a reputation beyond reputePosidrive has a reputation beyond reputePosidrive has a reputation beyond reputePosidrive has a reputation beyond reputePosidrive has a reputation beyond reputePosidrive has a reputation beyond reputePosidrive has a reputation beyond reputePosidrive has a reputation beyond reputePosidrive has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

Originally Posted by el_richo
Maybe i'm missing something but i'm not sure what the problem with this is. One family chooses* to have one income, the other does not. Why should one couple have their income reduced because of their lifestyle choice?[/SIZE]
I think that you have. Although the different tax deductions for the single earner family vs the dual earner family are a little irksome, we do make our own choices, and as another later post mentioned the dual earner family may very well have child care costs.

BUT, my BIG problem is that the new changes will penalise the family with the lower income after tax. This does not make any sense at all. As many have said, at these income levels neither family (assuming that they haven't bred like rabbits) should need the allowance, but as long as it is being paid then the only fair way is to base it upon total family income. I suspect that the new government just can't be bothered to implement anything that makes those who work for the Inland Revenue work a bit harder
Posidrive is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2010, 8:20 pm
  #50  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
 
Almost Canadian's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: South of Calgary
Posts: 13,378
Almost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
I certainly don't.

It's the Government's role to raise sufficient taxes in an efficient manner, not to ensure that Mr. 45k pays the same amount of tax as Mr 22k and Mrs 23k.

Tax Revenues are about "Money In to UK plc", and quite rightly should be based on actual money earned by individuals, regardless of their family circumstances.
But that is the whole basis upon which taxation rates etc are set. If it wasn`t, there would flat rate for all to pay. If the rates are set to act in a "fair way" then they should be fair.

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
Benefits should be based on the needs of households. If there is an unemployed wife of a 500k p.a. barrister, does their household need the same benefits as a minimum-wage household?

I agree with this and said so above.
Almost Canadian is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2010, 10:24 pm
  #51  
BE Forum Addict
 
jimf's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,340
jimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

Reading this it either sounds a poorly thought out mistake or a concession to the liberals which then gives them the grounds to really sort out the benefits system. I hope its the latter but I have my doubts.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...admits-PM.html
jimf is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2010, 11:39 pm
  #52  
Oscar nominated
 
BristolUK's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Moncton, NB, CANADA
Posts: 51,217
BristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

From Newsbiscuit
Middle-class families to strike over child benefit cuts
Britain is bracing itself for a Winter of Discontent after the middle class last night balloted its members over industrial action to protest at the scrapping of child benefit for higher-rate taxpayers. A ‘yes’ vote could see mass walkouts by middle-class families as early as November, with experts warning such a move could cripple vital public services such as Parent Teacher Association fetes and the continued administration of the Home Counties dinner party circuit.

‘I wasn’t at all bothered by the spending cuts before, but now I’m completely behind the ‘No to the Cuts’ campaign,’ said Matthew Singleton, a chartered accountant from Surrey. ‘We were going to have a fortnight in Florida over Christmas, but now it looks as if we’ll only be able to stretch to 10 days. We may even have to downsize my wife’s car from a Mercedes to a VW. The Tories say they’re pro-family, but try telling that to my little Anton and Tamara when they roll up at prep school in a second-rate German MPV.’

All across the UK solicitors and dentists are preparing to take to the streets and send a clear message to the government by foregoing their weekend games of squash at the sports club. ‘I would have gone on strike during the week,’ said Jasmine Egerton, a creative consultant from Hertfordshire, ‘but that would have been cutting off my nose to spite my face. I can make my point more effectively by withdrawing my daughter from piano lessons at the weekend and insisting she works to rule with her tennis coach.’

The planned protests have even attracted support from celebrity families who will themselves be hit by the cuts. ‘We was thinking about moving back to England,’ tweeted David Beckham yesterday. ‘With all our kids we’d have done quite nicely from child benefit, but now it’s been scrapped I don’t think we’ll bother.’

But for many middle-class families, the cuts have left them feeling conflicted. ‘I understand that we’re better off than some people, but couldn’t they cut other public spending first? It just makes me sick to see so much waste in the system. I mean, the fact that my nanny gets working tax credit on top of her minimum wage is just scandalous. I’ve a good mind to sell her back to those Liberian traffickers.’
BristolUK is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2010, 11:48 pm
  #53  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
 
Almost Canadian's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: South of Calgary
Posts: 13,378
Almost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

Originally Posted by jimf
Reading this it either sounds a poorly thought out mistake or a concession to the liberals which then gives them the grounds to really sort out the benefits system. I hope its the latter but I have my doubts.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...admits-PM.html
Originally Posted by BristolUK
Isn't it the redistribution of wealth (albeit on a small scale) that the left are always banging on about, but never admitting to? It will interesting to see if Labour oppose it, they are true hypocrites if they do.
Almost Canadian is offline  
Old Oct 6th 2010, 2:51 am
  #54  
BE Forum Addict
 
jimf's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,340
jimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
Isn't it the redistribution of wealth (albeit on a small scale) that the left are always banging on about, but never admitting to? It will interesting to see if Labour oppose it, they are true hypocrites if they do.
I think they've already denounced it as an attack on children and hard working families etc etc - thats what the one married to Ed Balls said anyway.

Last edited by jimf; Oct 6th 2010 at 2:54 am.
jimf is offline  
Old Oct 6th 2010, 12:10 pm
  #55  
Happy in NB
 
Dave+Jules's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Island View, New Brunswick
Posts: 2,020
Dave+Jules has a reputation beyond reputeDave+Jules has a reputation beyond reputeDave+Jules has a reputation beyond reputeDave+Jules has a reputation beyond reputeDave+Jules has a reputation beyond reputeDave+Jules has a reputation beyond reputeDave+Jules has a reputation beyond reputeDave+Jules has a reputation beyond reputeDave+Jules has a reputation beyond reputeDave+Jules has a reputation beyond reputeDave+Jules has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

I thought Child Benefit was used to channel some money to the mothers because in the time it was created most women stayed at home to look after the household. The men in their lives gave them housekeeping money and many women were cash starved.

It seems obvious to me a solution would be to make the taxation a household rather than individual evaluation and then review benefit entitlement against the income (all in the same process). Sounds like something we do here
Dave+Jules is offline  
Old Oct 6th 2010, 1:46 pm
  #56  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
 
Almost Canadian's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: South of Calgary
Posts: 13,378
Almost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

Originally Posted by jimf
I think they've already denounced it as an attack on children and hard working families etc etc - thats what the one married to Ed Balls said anyway.

So they are hypocrites then
Almost Canadian is offline  
Old Oct 6th 2010, 7:50 pm
  #57  
BE Forum Addict
 
jimf's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,340
jimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

You'd think the magazine has paid her to make all of this up because in the real world it just couldn't be true.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/ar...-BOOB-JOB.html
jimf is offline  
Old Oct 6th 2010, 9:48 pm
  #58  
Oscar nominated
 
BristolUK's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Moncton, NB, CANADA
Posts: 51,217
BristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond reputeBristolUK has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why are benefits so sacred in the UK?

Originally Posted by jimf
You'd think the magazine has paid her to make all of this up because in the real world it just couldn't be true.
Well, the benefit figures quoted are certainly accurate.
BristolUK is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.