British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Maple Leaf (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/)
-   -   UK Election Poll (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/uk-election-poll-857014/)

Shard May 8th 2015 2:00 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 

Originally Posted by withabix (Post 11640569)
It doesn't matter that a lot of the jobs created in the last 5 years are part time or zero hours contracts.

They are jobs. More people are employed. That's what the hard working population likes. More workers. Less spongers.

Let me see if I understand your logic. It doesn't matter if the jobs don't pay and reduction of benefits means some people are near destitute...that doesn't matter?

jimf May 8th 2015 2:10 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 

Originally Posted by Shard (Post 11640474)
It's not a puzzle. Milliband was unelectable. Clueless charmless incompetent back stabber. Labour had an excellent opportunity to replace him six months ago, and the party so incoherent, they didn't. Just desserts IMO.

Add to that the prospect of a nightmare SNP Labour coalition, and most sane voters in England took the safe option with the Conservatives.

The prospect of the gormless geek as PM with a shrill backseat driver made the conservatives the safe bet. It's a pity the liberals have been wiped out - for the most part they have been pretty decent but the tuition fees decision was a catastrophe for them. Cameron's main problem is the nutters in his own party. The sooner Scotland is responsible for it's own taxation and spending the better so the SNP can end "austerity" themselves.

withabix May 8th 2015 2:40 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 

Originally Posted by Shard (Post 11640607)
Let me see if I understand your logic. It doesn't matter if the jobs don't pay and reduction of benefits means some people are near destitute...that doesn't matter?

People should work for Benefits. Nothing should be free unless you have a real disability.

If you're near destitute, there is a good probability that part of it is your own fault. Destitute people still seem to manage to buy beer, fags and cannabis.

Unfortunately making the "won't work" spongers suffer has affected some other people.

But don't go believing all the hype about food bank visits.

Oink May 8th 2015 2:54 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 

Originally Posted by BristolUK (Post 11640403)
It's a mighty puzzle isn't it. Similar to when Thatcher kept getting back in. Maybe her legacy just lives on and there are enough of the "me first, sod the others" crowd.



Originally Posted by Shard (Post 11640474)
It's not a puzzle. Milliband was unelectable. Clueless charmless incompetent back stabber. Labour had an excellent opportunity to replace him six months ago, and the party so incoherent, they didn't. Just desserts IMO.

Add to that the prospect of a nightmare SNP Labour coalition, and most sane voters in England took the safe option with the Conservatives.


Its also not a puzzle that there has been a long tradition of working class conservatism in the Britain.

Shard May 8th 2015 2:54 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 

Originally Posted by withabix (Post 11640655)
People should work for Benefits. Nothing should be free unless you have a real disability.

If you're near destitute, there is a good probability that part of it is your own fault. Destitute people still seem to manage to buy beer, fags and cannabis.

Unfortunately making the "won't work" spongers suffer has affected some other people.

But don't go believing all the hype about food bank visits.

That's very simplistic. Most people receiving benefits do work. The "won't work spongers" are very few ... and for whatever reason have been disadvantaged by their circumstances. Poorly educated and very poorly socialised they often cannot work as they are unemployable. Placing them on welfare is the lesser of two evils (leaving them to fend for themselves). Suggesting the rise in food bank usage is hype shows just how ignorant you are of British social conditions.

withabix May 8th 2015 2:59 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 

Originally Posted by Shard (Post 11640669)
Suggesting the rise in food bank usage is hype shows just how ignorant you are of British social conditions.

Here's an interesting fact then:

The OECD’s social indicators survey in 2012 included the question: ‘Have there been times in the past 12 months when you did not have enough money to buy food that you or your family needed?’

8.1 per cent of UK respondents said yes, compared to 9.8 per cent when the same question was asked by the OECD in 2007. So notwithstanding today’s misleading figures, there are good reasons to believe that food poverty was higher under the last Labour government than it is today.

Shard May 8th 2015 3:09 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 
No need to pluck a snapshot statistic out of the air to try and defend your position. If you're really interested, have a look at the statistics relating to foodbanks themselves (volume and £ value). Look into the changes to DWP benefits sanctions regimes, and the statistics relating to that (void periods of a week or a month when recipients have their benefits withheld - often for technical errors). The data is out there for you to draw a more informed conclusion.

Oink May 8th 2015 3:10 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 
What really upset me about the election night was that bloke who ran as Elmo in Cameron's constituency. Why not pick a British character like a Teletubby or Roland Rat rather than some Septic transplant? Its depressing how our cultural icons are being shunned by our own people in favour of these transatlantic interlopers. :thumbdown:

confused_uk May 8th 2015 3:10 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 

Originally Posted by BristolUK (Post 11640590)
Not if job losses, reduced hours, other things and cuts wipe it out, no.
You really only have to see the massive use of food banks that just didn't even exist a few years ago as evidence that the gap between rich and poor has grown.


Privatising for its own sake began under Thatcher. It was inevitable that dogmatic approach would continue.

Not all low paid jobs are zero hours contracts etc, it's still a huge difference to those on a low income to pay less tax or none at all. It's not really the governments fault if private businesses choose to treat their employees like that, though they could step in & try to clamp down on it, who knows maybe they will.

Or it just shows we're overpopulated & there's not enough resources to go around.

The point is the NHS isn't really safe with anyone

Shard May 8th 2015 3:30 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 

Originally Posted by jimf (Post 11640616)
The prospect of the gormless geek as PM with a shrill backseat driver made the conservatives the safe bet. It's a pity the liberals have been wiped out - for the most part they have been pretty decent but the tuition fees decision was a catastrophe for them. Cameron's main problem is the nutters in his own party. The sooner Scotland is responsible for it's own taxation and spending the better so the SNP can end "austerity" themselves.

I think it will be many more election cycles until the LD's will have a chance at any power again. Unless some kind of PR is introduced, which given the outcome of minor parties in this election, may well become a topic again. Agree on Scotland, it seems the only way.

mdizzle May 8th 2015 3:41 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 

Originally Posted by withabix (Post 11640655)
People should work for Benefits. Nothing should be free unless you have a real disability.

If you're near destitute, there is a good probability that part of it is your own fault. Destitute people still seem to manage to buy beer, fags and cannabis.

Unfortunately making the "won't work" spongers suffer has affected some other people.

But don't go believing all the hype about food bank visits.

I reckon we should just round up the poor and put them all in a special camp where they are forced to work for some sort of meagre subsistence. You've got your priorities spot on mate.

colchar May 8th 2015 3:43 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 

Originally Posted by Shard (Post 11640669)
The "won't work spongers" are very few ... and for whatever reason have been disadvantaged by their circumstances.

That is a stretch. You cannot claim that they are all disadvantaged, some are just bone idle scroungers.



Poorly educated and very poorly socialised they often cannot work as they are unemployable.

Whose fault is that? If they had put forth some effort in school and prepared themselves for a career they could work.

Tirytory May 8th 2015 3:54 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 

Originally Posted by colchar (Post 11640729)
That is a stretch. You cannot claim that they are all disadvantaged, some are just bone idle scroungers.





Whose fault is that? If they had put forth some effort in school and prepared themselves for a career they could work.

That response is so simplistic it's laughable. it barely skims the surface of the reasons why people or generations end up in that position.

Shard May 8th 2015 3:55 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 

Originally Posted by colchar (Post 11640729)
That is a stretch. You cannot claim that they are all disadvantaged, some are just bone idle scroungers.

Whose fault is that? If they had put forth some effort in school and prepared themselves for a career they could work.

Some are, I agree. In my view they should receive their welfare pittance and be left to get on with their simple lives. I don't see them as scroungers, I see them as unfortunates, and don't believe they should be vilified for their circumstances.

Tirytory May 8th 2015 3:57 am

Re: UK Election Poll
 

Originally Posted by withabix (Post 11640673)
Here's an interesting fact then:

The OECD’s social indicators survey in 2012 included the question: ‘Have there been times in the past 12 months when you did not have enough money to buy food that you or your family needed?’

8.1 per cent of UK respondents said yes, compared to 9.8 per cent when the same question was asked by the OECD in 2007. So notwithstanding today’s misleading figures, there are good reasons to believe that food poverty was higher under the last Labour government than it is today.

Plus you do realise that dates back from 2011- it's hardly an accurate reflection of three years down the implementing cuts line...

Food banks have grown 19% year on year, and that's without those who don't visit and go hungry. It's shocking that this should happen in a first world country. Shocking and depressing....

And Colchar wonders why kids with empty bellies don't do well in school- don't climb out of the hole that the government dug for them...


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:52 pm.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.