The Toon Army / EPL thread
#886
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 894
From: Heritage Valley in Edmonton











Isn't that sad though, the top 4's reserves are better than other teams 1st teams.
Should we just make the 2nd team players play reserve games and not give them a chance to develop further. A number of former Arsenal 2nd team players are now regular 1st team players at other Premier League clubs. Are these clubs settling for 2nd rate players, or were they good players who were unlucky not to get 1st team games.
Lucky other teams, grasping at straws.
Of course players should get a chance, players have always been given a chance, the odd one may get a game here and there as part of their development. But to play a team of reserves in what is supposed to be the world's premier cup competition, says it all really.
Swansea are currently blooding a young player called Joe Allen, he will be a star one day, we don't have two teams we can put out and expect a win though.
the loan market is another indicator, teams can no longer carry enough of a squad to carry them through, instead they 'borrow' players when they need them and the Premier teams have so many players they can't possibly play them all.
The loss of the TV money has caused problems all the way down the football ladder, including grass roots level.
Of course Rio Ferdinand needs that third Porche and Christian Ronaldo he second Ferrari.. why not? Its only money!
I know I sound a depressive, I'm not really, I enjoy supporting my team and hope we get success, whatever that means these days, I just look up at the thieves at the top and shake my head in disbelief in what they have got away with.
#887
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 894
From: Heritage Valley in Edmonton











No, no, that was me.
Although I was in the stand for the home legs of all the UEFA Cup (oh, allright, Fairs Cup) matches in the '69 winning season. (Apart from that whatsit called the Intertoto or summat, that was the last time they actually won anything).
<I think you meant Wyn Davies>.
Although I was in the stand for the home legs of all the UEFA Cup (oh, allright, Fairs Cup) matches in the '69 winning season. (Apart from that whatsit called the Intertoto or summat, that was the last time they actually won anything).<I think you meant Wyn Davies>.
my own countryman as well
#888
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26,319











Of course players should get a chance, players have always been given a chance, the odd one may get a game here and there as part of their development. But to play a team of reserves in what is supposed to be the world's premier cup competition, says it all really.
I know I sound a depressive, I'm not really, I enjoy supporting my team and hope we get success, whatever that means these days, I just look up at the thieves at the top and shake my head in disbelief in what they have got away with.
I know I sound a depressive, I'm not really, I enjoy supporting my team and hope we get success, whatever that means these days, I just look up at the thieves at the top and shake my head in disbelief in what they have got away with.
No-one's 'got away' with anything. Unless you have proof of otherwise.
#889
Yes, I'm an Arsenal fan. Most of our reserve tam players are European, from the UK, France, Spain, Italy, and from Scandinavia. I'm not a fan of FIFA's proposed idea of making teams play a minimum of 5 English players in any starting XI as I feel that if these players are good enough they'd be playing anyway. If they aren't, how would these players feel to know they're just making up a quota? I'd call that reserve discrimination.
Second: I'm old school on this. I'd prefer to have a rule that only a minority (the smaller the better) of players in a club can represent a team other than the nearest geographically to where they were born.
Impractical for sure, but it would give at least a little meaning to the sense of "we" for supporters.
#890
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26,319











Two points; the big clubs (and here I'm not just talking about the top four) buy talent in rather than develop homegrown. Works for them, but not for the national side.
Second: I'm old school on this. I'd prefer to have a rule that only a minority (the smaller the better) of players in a club can represent a team other than the nearest geographically to where they were born.
Impractical for sure, but it would give at least a little meaning to the sense of "we" for supporters.
Second: I'm old school on this. I'd prefer to have a rule that only a minority (the smaller the better) of players in a club can represent a team other than the nearest geographically to where they were born.
Impractical for sure, but it would give at least a little meaning to the sense of "we" for supporters.
Would forcing clubs to play a minimum number of "home-grown" players improve the national team, or even improve the league clubs? The only team I'm aware of in the Premier League who field a large number of players born locally are Middlesbrough, and how many of those players except Downing play regularly for England?
#891










Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,883

Would forcing clubs to play a minimum number of "home-grown" players improve the national team, or even improve the league clubs? The only team I'm aware of in the Premier League who field a large number of players born locally are Middlesbrough, and how many of those players except Downing play regularly for England?
Kids don't play out any more. Parents are afraid to let them out to play in the street as we did as kids. Or they don't want to play out anyway they would rather sit in front of telly or computer playing games.
Very little talent is being developed at the grass roots level according to them.
#892
Your first point is a very good one, but I personally am not interested in what helps the England national team, nor any other.
Would forcing clubs to play a minimum number of "home-grown" players improve the national team, or even improve the league clubs? The only team I'm aware of in the Premier League who field a large number of players born locally are Middlesbrough, and how many of those players except Downing play regularly for England?
Would forcing clubs to play a minimum number of "home-grown" players improve the national team, or even improve the league clubs? The only team I'm aware of in the Premier League who field a large number of players born locally are Middlesbrough, and how many of those players except Downing play regularly for England?
Edit:On re-reading your post, you're conflating my two points in your 2nd paragraph.
Last edited by Novocastrian; Apr 7th 2009 at 11:57 am.
#893
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26,319











I do agree more needs to kids kids involved in the game, and they are the ones who'll become future players at the various levels. Until those numbers get much higher, there isn't going to be any improvement in the status quo.
Another reason teams buy players from abroad is the cost. Look at any transfer window and compare the cost of British players against foreign ones. If the prices were similar then I think clubs would buy more home-grown players.
Another reason teams buy players from abroad is the cost. Look at any transfer window and compare the cost of British players against foreign ones. If the prices were similar then I think clubs would buy more home-grown players.
#894
I do agree more needs to kids kids involved in the game, and they are the ones who'll become future players at the various levels. Until those numbers get much higher, there isn't going to be any improvement in the status quo.
Another reason teams buy players from abroad is the cost. Look at any transfer window and compare the cost of British players against foreign ones. If the prices were similar then I think clubs would buy more home-grown players.
Another reason teams buy players from abroad is the cost. Look at any transfer window and compare the cost of British players against foreign ones. If the prices were similar then I think clubs would buy more home-grown players.
Two Brits in the top 12 record transfer fees.
Rank Player From To Transfer Fee (£m) Year
1 Zinedine Zidane Juventus Real Madrid 46.0[1] 2001
2 LuÃÂs Figo Barcelona Real Madrid 38.7[2] 2000
3 Hernán Crespo Parma Lazio 35.5[3] 2000
4 Gianluigi Buffon Parma Juventus 32.6[4] 2001
5 Christian Vieri Lazio Internazionale 32.0[5] 1999
6 Andriy Shevchenk Milan Chelsea 30.8[6] 2006
7 Pavel Nedvěd Lazio Juventus 30.6[7] 2001
8 Wayne Rooney Everton Manchester Utd 30.0[8] 2004
9 Rio Ferdinand Leeds Utd Manchester Utd 29.5[9] 2002
10 Gaizka Mendieta Valencia Lazio 29.0[10] 2001
11 Ronaldo Internazionale Real Madrid 28.49[11] 2002
12 Juan Sebastián Verón Lazio Manchester Utd 28.1[12] 2001
#895
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26,319











If the likes of real Madrid and Man Utd want to consistently pay those amounts of money for world-class players, then that's their choice. Other than How many of the current England squad would go for record amounts these days if they were sold. I could only think of 4, maybe 5.
Steven Gerrard
Wayne Rooney
Rio Ferdinand
Frank Lampard
John Terry
Steven Gerrard
Wayne Rooney
Rio Ferdinand
Frank Lampard
John Terry
#896
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 894
From: Heritage Valley in Edmonton











#897
The barcodes looked pretty sorry against the Spurs this afternoon. Bringing on unfit and injured strikers was desperation to say the least.
I'm sorry but I think one more loss and the team is going to be enjoying life in the Championship. Hopefully they won't do a Leeds and will be back up soon as we'll miss their quaint and jolly fans.
I'm sorry but I think one more loss and the team is going to be enjoying life in the Championship. Hopefully they won't do a Leeds and will be back up soon as we'll miss their quaint and jolly fans.
#898
The barcodes looked pretty sorry against the Spurs this afternoon. Bringing on unfit and injured strikers was desperation to say the least.
I'm sorry but I think one more loss and the team is going to be enjoying life in the Championship. Hopefully they won't do a Leeds and will be back up soon as we'll miss their quaint and jolly fans.
I'm sorry but I think one more loss and the team is going to be enjoying life in the Championship. Hopefully they won't do a Leeds and will be back up soon as we'll miss their quaint and jolly fans.

There's no way a point would have been deserved overall, but the lads aren't having any lucky breaks right now.
Meanwhile, I'll do my best to continue to be quaint and jolly.
#900
Its tough one when you handle the ball in the box and where that also gives you the opportunity to shoot.
What's Shearer thinking? "It's still tha best cloob in tha woooooould man!"
http://www.sportbox.tv/images/action...wcastle_47.jpg
What's Shearer thinking? "It's still tha best cloob in tha woooooould man!"

http://www.sportbox.tv/images/action...wcastle_47.jpg
Shearer's from Yorkshire? Who knew?



