Timmies UK?!
#48
Just Joined
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2
From: Barrie, Ontario

Was browsing for some pictures and then I found this thread through google.
Your notifying of the Toronto Sun was a success as I saw a page on the fraudulent Tim Hortons and the designer of "Timmies" said Tim Hortons are taking legal action.
I believe notifying Tim Hortons was the right thing to do. Stop intellectual property sponging!
Peace.
Your notifying of the Toronto Sun was a success as I saw a page on the fraudulent Tim Hortons and the designer of "Timmies" said Tim Hortons are taking legal action.
I believe notifying Tim Hortons was the right thing to do. Stop intellectual property sponging!
Peace.
#49
Just Joined

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 20








Interesting, I have had a few calls from the Toronto Sun, although I haven't spoken to anyone as yet.
Do you have a link to the story?
Do you have a link to the story?
#51
Just Joined
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2
From: Barrie, Ontario

Yes, the above link is the article I was referring to.
#52
Hey Dean / ukleaf,
I don't know why you didn't just pour petrol through the letterbox and torch the place.
I would say, "I hope you're happy now," but you probably are.
What a snivelling wee clipe.
I don't know why you didn't just pour petrol through the letterbox and torch the place.
I would say, "I hope you're happy now," but you probably are.
What a snivelling wee clipe.
#53
Why didn't he just ape the format - cheap donuts and manky coffee. He could even have called it Timmies as far as I'm concerned. But why did he have to steal someone else's logo exactly?
#54
But he has just aped the format. And is a generic plastic coffee and doughnut shop such a novel and original concept?
My point though, is that Tim Hortons Inc. is big enough and powerful enough to protect its own business as it sees fit. Its marketing people probably can't believe the fact that there are people in Britain who are so infatuated with their product that they'll behave like classroom tell-tales to 'protect' their image (albeit with much more serious consequences)
Personally, I would never have the brass neck (or half a brain?) to come onto an internet forum and proudly admit that I had cliped on someone's business which could result in it being closed down. Wow! I still can't believe ukleaf actually did that, and got his real name plastered in the papers...
My point though, is that Tim Hortons Inc. is big enough and powerful enough to protect its own business as it sees fit. Its marketing people probably can't believe the fact that there are people in Britain who are so infatuated with their product that they'll behave like classroom tell-tales to 'protect' their image (albeit with much more serious consequences)
Personally, I would never have the brass neck (or half a brain?) to come onto an internet forum and proudly admit that I had cliped on someone's business which could result in it being closed down. Wow! I still can't believe ukleaf actually did that, and got his real name plastered in the papers...
Last edited by Jingsamichty; Jul 7th 2008 at 3:59 am. Reason: Lest the grammar police come a-knocking...
#55
My point though, is that Tim Hortons Inc. is big enough and powerful enough to protect its own business as it sees fit. It's marketing people probably can't believe the fact that there are people in Britain who are so infatuated with their product that they'll behave like classroom tell-tales to 'protect' their iamge (albeit with much more serious consequences)
Personally, I would never have the brass neck (or half a brain?) to come onto an internet forum and proudly admit that I had cliped on someone's business which could result in it being closed down. Wow! I still can't believe ukleaf actually did that, and got his real name plastered in the papers...
#56
They're getting into Spars, someone said they're selling them in Tesco branches. They have to protect their logo when they're so new in the market, is that right taken away from them because they're "big"? How do we know they weren't already aware of this shop? We don't. That looks like a pretty generic email response upthread to me.
I'm not suggesting he's going to do it, but I certainly wouldn't take that risk. Let's face it... now he knows where to find him. Anyway, Biiiiink, why should ukleaf think that he has the right to cause this man such grief, yet be immune from any form of comeback?
#57
So do we agree that what the Leeds guy did wasn't on? You just don't think it was down to an individual consumer to point it out to TH's? You think it's only okay for the Leeds guy to be caught if a member of TH's legal department happens to be out walking in town and spots it? Bizarre!
I don't think UKleaf has anything to be concerned about. His picture may be used in evidence, what else has he got to do with any of it? Suggesting that he should be scared for taking this action is not on though, and not true.
I don't think "the fact that they haven't closed him down already suggests that they guy is actually in the clear" is right. These things take time. They won't stop him trading, they'll insist he change his name. He may or may not have to pay them something, I have no idea how that works. I can't feel sorry for him, such a stupid thing to steal a global corporation's logo... even my 5yr old knows you can't copy someone else's work
#58
I've never suggested that what the Leeds shop owner has done is OK. He takes his own business risks. Silly stupid - yes, but that's not the point here.
What I've said is I think it is wrong, petty, spiteful and vindictive for ukleaf to have grassed him up to the press and to Tim Hortons Inc. Unless he is a shareholder, it is NO BUSINESS of ukleaf's whether this guy has copied Tim Hortons or not.
I asked him earlier if he had ever bought a pirate DVD, or knock-off goods, as that's the same principle... but that was conveniently brushed over.
What I've said is I think it is wrong, petty, spiteful and vindictive for ukleaf to have grassed him up to the press and to Tim Hortons Inc. Unless he is a shareholder, it is NO BUSINESS of ukleaf's whether this guy has copied Tim Hortons or not.
I asked him earlier if he had ever bought a pirate DVD, or knock-off goods, as that's the same principle... but that was conveniently brushed over.
#59
Buying something knowing it's fake is one thing, but buying something believing it to be the genuine article is what we're talking about with this guy in Leeds.
#60
It is, he was conned into thinking it was a TH's by the guy's use of the logo. Read his posts, he was let down and disappointed after discovering the products he'd bought from them were fake.
Buying something knowing it's fake is one thing, but buying something believing it to be the genuine article is what we're talking about with this guy in Leeds.
Buying something knowing it's fake is one thing, but buying something believing it to be the genuine article is what we're talking about with this guy in Leeds.
I'll get me coat...



