![]() |
Teachers and the use of language
I am curious to know how various phrases especially "oh! You lazy girl." Is interpreted in Canada and the Uk in classrooms.
Would it be considered offensive? Ruby |
Re: Teachers and the use of language
Originally Posted by RubyRose
(Post 12470591)
I am curious to know how various phrases especially "oh! You lazy girl." Is interpreted in Canada and the Uk in classrooms.
Would it be considered offensive? Ruby |
Re: Teachers and the use of language
Originally Posted by RubyRose
(Post 12470591)
I am curious to know how various phrases especially "oh! You lazy girl." Is interpreted in Canada and the Uk in classrooms.
Would it be considered offensive? Ruby |
Re: Teachers and the use of language
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 12470619)
I think it's a compliment in Canada.
|
Re: Teachers and the use of language
Never talk to children aggressive it’s against their person rights
Remember no one wins, no one loses, everyone gets an A, no one fails and you be up to speed with modern day schooling |
Re: Teachers and the use of language
:rofl:
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 12470627)
Never talk to children aggressive it’s against their person rights
Remember no one wins, no one loses, everyone gets an A, no one fails and you be up to speed with modern day schooling |
Re: Teachers and the use of language
Hang on. I've done my usual of scanning and misreading turns out the teacher didn't say "lazy git" but "lazy girl". Lazy git would be fun, lazy girl? Is she a girl and is she lazy? Was it said as a joke? In front of everyone?
|
Re: Teachers and the use of language
Originally Posted by RubyRose
(Post 12470591)
I am curious to know how various phrases especially "oh! You lazy girl." Is interpreted in Canada and the Uk in classrooms.
Would it be considered offensive? Ruby |
Re: Teachers and the use of language
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 12470691)
Hang on. I've done my usual of scanning and misreading turns out the teacher didn't say "lazy git" but "lazy girl". Lazy git would be fun, lazy girl? Is she a girl and is she lazy? Was it said as a joke? In front of everyone?
|
Re: Teachers and the use of language
Originally Posted by Aviator
(Post 12470696)
Depends which gender it is directed at, or maybe a negative gender!
|
Re: Teachers and the use of language
Originally Posted by RubyRose
(Post 12470697)
It was humourous. Not in front of everyone. She is capable of good work but chose not to produce sufficient work.
|
Re: Teachers and the use of language
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 12470707)
Sounds fine to me then
|
Re: Teachers and the use of language
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 12470627)
Remember no one wins, no one loses, everyone gets an A, no one fails and you be up to speed with modern day schooling
I explained that at my primary school, long long ago, we had a board showing a grid with pupils names down one side and the numbers 2 to 12 across the top. We were learning tables and when we could recite a set correctly a star was placed in the appropriate column against your name. It was there for all to see and invoked competition for us at a very young age. 'Ah' she said 'Don't think that'll be allowed today'. It's always puzzled me that we can't allow competition to creep into school learning but we scream with enthusiasm when the little tykes beat each other up trying to put a ball over a line or smash each other on the head with a stick in order to bounce a small piece of rubber around an ice rink. Methinks this competitive impulse could be better spent where it could do some good. |
Re: Teachers and the use of language
Originally Posted by dave_j
(Post 12470750)
I was discussing my granddaughter's teaching with my daughter the other day and the subject of learning 'tables' crept in.
I explained that at my primary school, long long ago, we had a board showing a grid with pupils names down one side and the numbers 2 to 12 across the top. We were learning tables and when we could recite a set correctly a star was placed in the appropriate column against your name. It was there for all to see and invoked competition for us at a very young age. 'Ah' she said 'Don't think that'll be allowed today'. It's always puzzled me that we can't allow competition to creep into school learning but we scream with enthusiasm when the little tykes beat each other up trying to put a ball over a line or smash each other on the head with a stick in order to bounce a small piece of rubber around an ice rink. Methinks this competitive impulse could be better spent where it could do some good. |
Re: Teachers and the use of language
Originally Posted by RubyRose
(Post 12470624)
Why is it a compliment?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:43 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.