Should BC consider a name change?
#46
Re: Should BC consider a name change?
#47
Banned
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 19,879
Re: Should BC consider a name change?
https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-scienc...rritories/9224
https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-scienc...-capitals/9188
https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-scienc...-capitals/9188
Last edited by Siouxie; Jun 25th 2020 at 12:33 am.
#48
Just Joined
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 3
Re: Should BC consider a name change?
This subject is something I remember some people talking about in the late 1980's when I first visited BC on vacation. A popular suggestion then was "Pacifica". Obviously nothing came about it then and I doubt if anything will happen in the forseeable future.
#49
Re: Should BC consider a name change?
Didn't the Pacifica idea involve some sort of union with the nearby States? I thought it was a move to acknowledge that the people in fkaBC have more in common with those in California than those in Alberta and the parts of Canada east of Alberta.
#50
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: Should BC consider a name change?
It's not too far off. Coastal BC is a lot like coastal WA and down to San Francisco but then as you get into So. California less in common with the PNW and BC.
So. California and No. California are different enough where people have proposed California splitting into 2 or more states.
So. California and No. California are different enough where people have proposed California splitting into 2 or more states.
#51
Re: Should BC consider a name change?
I think I'll toss a small grenade into the thread.
Perhaps we should engage in a much more entertaining (at least from the viewpoint english speakers among us) discussion about the much needed renaming of Quebec.
Since no self respecting member of the quebecois would countenance any name not in french so I'll nominate a first suggestion as "Wolfe-terre"
Not very original I'll admit, but it's been a warm day.
Perhaps we should engage in a much more entertaining (at least from the viewpoint english speakers among us) discussion about the much needed renaming of Quebec.
Since no self respecting member of the quebecois would countenance any name not in french so I'll nominate a first suggestion as "Wolfe-terre"
Not very original I'll admit, but it's been a warm day.
#52
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Somewhere between Vancouver & St Johns
Posts: 19,851
Re: Should BC consider a name change?
Just make any name change easy to pronounce and spell. Is it kwubec or kwaybec?
#53
Re: Should BC consider a name change?
I think I'll toss a small grenade into the thread.
Perhaps we should engage in a much more entertaining (at least from the viewpoint english speakers among us) discussion about the much needed renaming of Quebec.
Since no self respecting member of the quebecois would countenance any name not in french so I'll nominate a first suggestion as "Wolfe-terre"
Not very original I'll admit, but it's been a warm day.
Perhaps we should engage in a much more entertaining (at least from the viewpoint english speakers among us) discussion about the much needed renaming of Quebec.
Since no self respecting member of the quebecois would countenance any name not in french so I'll nominate a first suggestion as "Wolfe-terre"
Not very original I'll admit, but it's been a warm day.
#54
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: Should BC consider a name change?
My history classes in high school varied by grade in California.
9th grade was world history but really it was history of Europe from around 1300's to 1700's.
10th grade was Mexican-American history, the history of Mexico-US through the years from Mexico's independence to the 1990's.
11th grade was Spanish-American history & California history pre-US statehood combined.
12th grade was US History which was just really the revolutionary war, civil war and WW2.
Guess there is far too much history to possibly cover everything in high school, so they stuck with the basics. We did however learn 0 about Canada, but then in So. California, Canada really shares no history, and of no historical relevance to the region, so they stick with Mexico and Spainish-American history since that is the history of the area.
9th grade was world history but really it was history of Europe from around 1300's to 1700's.
10th grade was Mexican-American history, the history of Mexico-US through the years from Mexico's independence to the 1990's.
11th grade was Spanish-American history & California history pre-US statehood combined.
12th grade was US History which was just really the revolutionary war, civil war and WW2.
Guess there is far too much history to possibly cover everything in high school, so they stuck with the basics. We did however learn 0 about Canada, but then in So. California, Canada really shares no history, and of no historical relevance to the region, so they stick with Mexico and Spainish-American history since that is the history of the area.
#55
Re: Should BC consider a name change?
The Dixie Chicks have decided to drop the racism and keep the sexism. No one should be vulnerable because of their race. Or their sex. How many women are killed by men? Mmiwg.
#56
Re: Should BC consider a name change?
#58
Re: Should BC consider a name change?
That was what I meant by "historical connections", it reflects life in Canada over the past decades and it has the kind of faux native sound that would be wanted from a new name.
#59
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Aug 2013
Location: Maple Ridge, Super Natural British Columbia
Posts: 2,071
Re: Should BC consider a name change?
....and yet nobody has insisted that the Stanley Cup or the Grey Cup get renamed immediately.
Both named after front-line racists....
Both named after front-line racists....
#60
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Somewhere between Vancouver & St Johns
Posts: 19,851