Racism in football
#16
Re: Racism in football
so did I. Off-field = in the stands.
That's my point - it's unlikely to affect the result. If the losing side shouts abuse, they forfeit a game they were losing anyway.
but the problem comes as i say when the club challenges it, how could anyone deffinitively prove that a certain fan, or, section of fans did the chanting, even though it should be as obvious as you point out, a reasonable doubt will remain, and it will probably be replayed, to the losing teams obvious advantage.
I don't think anyone's suggesting that a single plonker shouting abuse from the stand is going to get picked out by the ref. But are you trying to tell me that enough people are in the "wrong" end that they would be able to make themselves heard, to the extent of distinguishing the words, over the other 76,000?
i've heard old trafford and other grounds, wigan springs to mind, where after a goal and the home side goes quiet, its quite easy to pick out a small group. as for individuals, well there are stewards everywhere, if, and its a big if, this is taken seriously, the stewards could be employed and this could be taken to an individual level with the ref being informed at half time say, or any other short break in the game.
I disagree - I think it has a chance of success if the sanctions are appropriate (e.g. game forfeits, points docked etc) and the clubs buy in to the idea - I mean really buy in, not just pay lip service - that racism has no place in a football ground. But that's just my opinion, and I'm not a die-hard (or even a die-easy, frankly) footie fan.
That's my point - it's unlikely to affect the result. If the losing side shouts abuse, they forfeit a game they were losing anyway.
but the problem comes as i say when the club challenges it, how could anyone deffinitively prove that a certain fan, or, section of fans did the chanting, even though it should be as obvious as you point out, a reasonable doubt will remain, and it will probably be replayed, to the losing teams obvious advantage.
I don't think anyone's suggesting that a single plonker shouting abuse from the stand is going to get picked out by the ref. But are you trying to tell me that enough people are in the "wrong" end that they would be able to make themselves heard, to the extent of distinguishing the words, over the other 76,000?
i've heard old trafford and other grounds, wigan springs to mind, where after a goal and the home side goes quiet, its quite easy to pick out a small group. as for individuals, well there are stewards everywhere, if, and its a big if, this is taken seriously, the stewards could be employed and this could be taken to an individual level with the ref being informed at half time say, or any other short break in the game.
I disagree - I think it has a chance of success if the sanctions are appropriate (e.g. game forfeits, points docked etc) and the clubs buy in to the idea - I mean really buy in, not just pay lip service - that racism has no place in a football ground. But that's just my opinion, and I'm not a die-hard (or even a die-easy, frankly) footie fan.
#17
Re: Racism in football
so did I. Off-field = in the stands.
That's my point - it's unlikely to affect the result. If the losing side shouts abuse, they forfeit a game they were losing anyway. If the winning side's supporters are guilty, it's in the club's interest to identify and ban those responsible. If abusive chants are coming from the winning side's section of the ground, they're hardly fans worthy of the name if they know they'll get the game forfeited and lose their team 3 certain points. Win-win, I'd have thought.
I don't think anyone's suggesting that a single plonker shouting abuse from the stand is going to get picked out by the ref. But are you trying to tell me that enough people are in the "wrong" end that they would be able to make themselves heard, to the extent of distinguishing the words, over the other 76,000?
I disagree - I think it has a chance of success if the sanctions are appropriate (e.g. game forfeits, points docked etc) and the clubs buy in to the idea - I mean really buy in, not just pay lip service - that racism has no place in a football ground. But that's just my opinion, and I'm not a die-hard (or even a die-easy, frankly) footie fan.
That's my point - it's unlikely to affect the result. If the losing side shouts abuse, they forfeit a game they were losing anyway. If the winning side's supporters are guilty, it's in the club's interest to identify and ban those responsible. If abusive chants are coming from the winning side's section of the ground, they're hardly fans worthy of the name if they know they'll get the game forfeited and lose their team 3 certain points. Win-win, I'd have thought.
I don't think anyone's suggesting that a single plonker shouting abuse from the stand is going to get picked out by the ref. But are you trying to tell me that enough people are in the "wrong" end that they would be able to make themselves heard, to the extent of distinguishing the words, over the other 76,000?
I disagree - I think it has a chance of success if the sanctions are appropriate (e.g. game forfeits, points docked etc) and the clubs buy in to the idea - I mean really buy in, not just pay lip service - that racism has no place in a football ground. But that's just my opinion, and I'm not a die-hard (or even a die-easy, frankly) footie fan.
#19
Re: Racism in football
so did I. Off-field = in the stands.
That's my point - it's unlikely to affect the result. If the losing side shouts abuse, they forfeit a game they were losing anyway. If the winning side's supporters are guilty, it's in the club's interest to identify and ban those responsible. If abusive chants are coming from the winning side's section of the ground, they're hardly fans worthy of the name if they know they'll get the game forfeited and lose their team 3 certain points. Win-win, I'd have thought.
I don't think anyone's suggesting that a single plonker shouting abuse from the stand is going to get picked out by the ref. But are you trying to tell me that enough people are in the "wrong" end that they would be able to make themselves heard, to the extent of distinguishing the words, over the other 76,000?
I disagree - I think it has a chance of success if the sanctions are appropriate (e.g. game forfeits, points docked etc) and the clubs buy in to the idea - I mean really buy in, not just pay lip service - that racism has no place in a football ground. But that's just my opinion, and I'm not a die-hard (or even a die-easy, frankly) footie fan.
That's my point - it's unlikely to affect the result. If the losing side shouts abuse, they forfeit a game they were losing anyway. If the winning side's supporters are guilty, it's in the club's interest to identify and ban those responsible. If abusive chants are coming from the winning side's section of the ground, they're hardly fans worthy of the name if they know they'll get the game forfeited and lose their team 3 certain points. Win-win, I'd have thought.
I don't think anyone's suggesting that a single plonker shouting abuse from the stand is going to get picked out by the ref. But are you trying to tell me that enough people are in the "wrong" end that they would be able to make themselves heard, to the extent of distinguishing the words, over the other 76,000?
I disagree - I think it has a chance of success if the sanctions are appropriate (e.g. game forfeits, points docked etc) and the clubs buy in to the idea - I mean really buy in, not just pay lip service - that racism has no place in a football ground. But that's just my opinion, and I'm not a die-hard (or even a die-easy, frankly) footie fan.
#22
Account Closed
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26,319
Re: Racism in football
Some of us spend way too much time learning this stuff, and not enough time doing what I should be doing. No problem Rae.