![]() |
Question about A-levels
This is really aimed at people still in the UK with kids of the appropriate age.
I have a son back in the UK. He's in his GCSE year and starting to think about A-levels. He seems to have a notion that is normal to do four. In my day it was three, unless you were very bright. Have things changed? |
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 9661236)
This is really aimed at people still in the UK with kids of the appropriate age.
I have a son back in the UK. He's in his GCSE year and starting to think about A-levels. He seems to have a notion that is normal to do four. In my day it was three, unless you were very bright. Have things changed? |
Re: Question about A-levels
From my understanding (limited and only from speaking to teenage relatives and neighbours), the norm these days is to start out studying 4 subjects, but to then drop your weakest one after AS level, so in essence you end up with 3.5 A levels (3 full A levels and 1 AS).
HTH. |
Re: Question about A-levels
All grist to the mill. Thanks to both of you.
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Tangram
(Post 9661251)
My day ( 80's ) we did three plus General Studies A Level.
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Atlantic Xpat
(Post 9661488)
But that was back when A levels were difficult;) I too did 3 A levels and I suspect Souvy is of a similar vintage.
When I did my maths O-level, you couldn't use a calculator. For the A-level (maths/statistics) you could but you still had to show the working. It was the same for the first two years of my degree. |
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 9661584)
1963 was a good year.
|
Re: Question about A-levels
I seem to remember that we were allowed to use slide rules (though I'm damned if I could use one now). I also seem to remember that most of the marks were for the workings. You would fail if you just wrote down all the correct answers.
I took 3 A levels and 1 AS. |
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 9661592)
Did they even have O levels in 1963?
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by JonboyE
(Post 9661648)
I seem to remember that we were allowed to use slide rules (though I'm damned if I could use one now). I also seem to remember that most of the marks were for the workings. You would fail if you just wrote down all the correct answers.
I took 3 A levels and 1 AS. What you say reminds me of one infamous maths exam during my degree. It was a three-hour exam, based on one set of data that went through a series of analyses of increasing complexity involving lots of Greek letters. The end result was a single number, to two decimal places. There were only two possible marks on that test; 100% or 0%. You got no marks for the workings. Not many people got 100%. |
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 9661692)
Slide rules? There's posh. I think we had log tables. I would not know what to do with one these days.
What you say reminds me of one infamous maths exam during my degree. It was a three-hour exam, based on one set of data that went through a series of analyses of increasing complexity involving lots of Greek letters. The end result was a single number, to two decimal places. There were only two possible marks on that test; 100% or 0%. You got no marks for the workings. Not many people got 100%. |
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 9661692)
What you say reminds me of one infamous maths exam during my degree. It was a three-hour exam, based on one set of data that went through a series of analyses of increasing complexity involving lots of Greek letters. The end result was a single number, to two decimal places. There were only two possible marks on that test; 100% or 0%. You got no marks for the workings. Not many people got 100%. |
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by ireland2canada
(Post 9661894)
Without putting too fine a point on it, WTF is the use in being able to do that?
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 9661898)
I know, only 2 decimal places. I mean really!
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 9661908)
I'll bet that answer was 3.14. That's a pretty famous maths number to 2 decimal places, I can't think of any others?
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by ireland2canada
(Post 9661894)
Without putting too fine a point on it, WTF is the use in being able to do that?
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 9661913)
2.72, or 1.62?
|
Re: Question about A-levels
3 "big" A levels at my grammar. General studies as a fourth but only if the teachers thought you could cope with it. And I'm a late 1980's A level girl.
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 9661908)
I'll bet that answer was 3.14. That's a pretty famous maths number to 2 decimal places, I can't think of any others?
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 9661948)
Are they famous enough to be the answers to a maths quiz?
Edit: One is e and the other is the golden ratio. |
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 9661998)
They should be to maths people. I only got a richard and I know them.
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 9662000)
I haven't heard that term for a long time. Might one ask where from?
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 9662017)
Sure. I did maths at Southampton uni.
I knew lots of kids who were whizzes at A level but couldn't deal with the conceptual/abstract/multidimensional thinking at uni. I've mentioned that I'm a simple chemist. |
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 9662093)
I've mentioned that I'm a simple chemist.
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Atlantic Xpat
(Post 9662207)
Can you fill prescriptions?
|
Re: Question about A-levels
I recall I did five. My grades suggested I preferred quantity over quality. In one subject I received an O, which I always felt was a particularly patronising grade. I believe it indicated something akin to 15%.
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by lmartin999
(Post 9663740)
I recall I did five. My grades suggested I preferred quantity over quality. In one subject I received an O, which I always felt was a particularly patronising grade. I believe it indicated something akin to 15%.
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 9661236)
This is really aimed at people still in the UK with kids of the appropriate age.
I have a son back in the UK. He's in his GCSE year and starting to think about A-levels. He seems to have a notion that is normal to do four. In my day it was three, unless you were very bright. Have things changed? |
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 9663874)
I did four, but in typical geek style they were maths, "additional maths," physics and chemistry.
Geek style? Well, really!! |
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 9665249)
Geek style? That's pretty much what I did, except plus "S" levels in Physics & Chem on top.
Geek style? Well, really!! My S-level papers were in maths and physics - didn't to chemistry S as it was my weaker subject and the powers that be suggested two Ss would suffice. |
Re: Question about A-levels
My daughter did four plus general studies and some kind of extended project that was the equivalent of an AS I think.
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 9667574)
Well you, Sir, and I, Sir, are probably what would in these modern times be considered geeks. Despite all evidence to the contrary with your worldly ways and polyglot cosmopolitan lifestyle, your chosen profession is pretty much the definition of geekery in some people's eyes... ;)
His A-levels are hardly relevant. <you still on for Friday?> |
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 9668280)
A geek, Sir, is someone who has never experienced, and is likely incapable of experiencing, the beautiful nuances of humanity and its varied cultures. One who's heart has never roared with desire and throbbed with sympathy for the downtrodden. A creature of pimples, slide rules, masturbation and numbing loneliness.
His A-levels are hardly relevant. <you still on for Friday?> |
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by mandymoochops
(Post 9670070)
they have greasy hair - normally - too. I don't know where they get that from, other than eating bacon butties, masturbating and running their hands through their barnet.
|
Re: Question about A-levels
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 9670269)
Bleeuugh... all at the same time? That would require a level of dexterity - or absent-mindedness - that I am grateful not to have achieved...
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:58 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.