![]() |
Panama Papers
Money is more interesting than Wikileaks...
David Cameron left dangerously exposed by Panama Papers fallout | News | The Guardian If Cameron or his family stands to benefit from this then it's difficult to see how he can stay as PM..... I seem to remember in the past the Guardian has made use of offshore companies though.... |
Re: Panama Papers
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 11914837)
If Cameron or his family stands to benefit from this then it's difficult to see how he can stay as PM.....
If he were a man who trades on his reputation, like the deranged but transparently honest Corbyn, then he'd be in real trouble. However, to discover that while Cameron's dong was in the pig, his nose was in the trough, won't be a real shock to anyone. He'll tough it out. |
Re: Panama Papers
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 11914901)
I don't see that. He's a Conservative Prime Minister, his policies are to take from the poor and give to the rich. He's rich. People will expect his personal tax affairs to be dodgy.
Thatcher (with Denis and Mark) got away with far more than what's out so far. |
Re: Panama Papers
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 11914911)
:nod:
Thatcher (with Denis and Mark) got away with far more than what's out so far. Too true... this is tax evasion almost the Tory default Maggie's crew were up for hard core illegal arms trading,mercenaries linked to 3rd world regime change |
Re: Panama Papers
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 11914901)
I don't see that. He's a Conservative Prime Minister, his policies are to take from the poor and give to the rich. He's rich. People will expect his personal tax affairs to be dodgy.
If he were a man who trades on his reputation, like the deranged but transparently honest Corbyn, then he'd be in real trouble. However, to discover that while Cameron's dong was in the pig, his nose was in the trough, won't be a real shock to anyone. He'll tough it out. Unless Cameron is a contortionist, which seems unlikely, you'd need a pretty small pig to pull off that stunt. |
Re: Panama Papers
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 11915545)
You have such a delicate turn of phrase.
Unless Cameron is a contortionist, which seems unlikely, you'd need a pretty small pig to pull off that stunt. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...-oxford-secret |
Re: Panama Papers
Rich people avoid paying tax! Shock horror!
We all know this anyway. |
Re: Panama Papers
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 11915545)
You have such a delicate turn of phrase.
Unless Cameron is a contortionist, which seems unlikely, you'd need a pretty small pig to pull off that stunt. |
Re: Panama Papers
What the press is studiously trying hard to not mention is that these documents apparently show a sharp drop-off in business since 2009, which was when the new information-sharing agreements came into force. Cameron and various other people tried very hard to crack down on tax havens when the recession was going full tilt, if you remember.
Try opening up an offshore bank account now and getting a debit card linked to it, not easy. Especially if you don't want to appear in person. You can get USD accounts through a Canadian bank and some have US affiliates who will issue you a card as well, but try some other currency. |
Re: Panama Papers
And because we all need a laugh on Fridays google "That money was just resting in my account Pete Wilson". It will take you to a 20 sec Father Ted remake on twitter.
If anyone is more tech savvy than me (pretty much everyone) please add the link as I can't seem to get it. |
Re: Panama Papers
Originally Posted by Steve_
(Post 11916743)
Try opening up an offshore bank account now and getting a debit card linked to it, not easy. Especially if you don't want to appear in person.
Every now and then we get a pitch for setting up a similar arrangement, it doesn't seem to be a bother to arrange but it is expensive. If you're shipping $1,000,000/yr or a one time huge slab of cash then it works but, for hundreds of thousands, you may as well pay the tax (unless your personal reputation or political position requires you to seem a bit sly). |
Re: Panama Papers
Does this now mean I now morally, have to close my 3 offshore bank accounts.
Confused really confused...!!! |
Re: Panama Papers
Originally Posted by fuchs01
(Post 11917303)
Does this now mean I now morally, have to close my 3 offshore bank accounts.
Confused really confused...!!! |
Re: Panama Papers
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 11917292)
... If you're shipping $1,000,000/yr or a one time huge slab of cash then it works but, for hundreds of thousands, you may as well pay the tax (unless your personal reputation or political position requires you to seem a bit sly).
|
Re: Panama Papers
Originally Posted by veggies
(Post 11917387)
Fuchs isn't really a household name in the elite circle consisting of movers and shakers
Can we now accept Panama into the EU...tally-ho. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:06 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.