Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Canada > The Maple Leaf
Reload this Page >

One way trip to Mars.

Wikiposts

One way trip to Mars.

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 2nd 2013 | 8:38 am
  #16  
MarkG's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,109
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
MarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

Originally Posted by Steve_
Well you're talking to a bunch of emigrants so I don't think we lack pioneering spirit.
We just can't handle another multi-year wait for a Mars visa .

BTW, is there any proof that we need 1g for a pregnancy to work? All I can find on the subject are worries about radiation levels, which are much easier to deal with (build your house a few metres underground, which you'll probably want to do anyway for thermal reasons).
 
Old Sep 2nd 2013 | 8:42 am
  #17  
Thread Starter
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,578
From: Somewhere between Vancouver & St Johns
Former Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

I wonder if the price of cheese would be any cheaper on Mars once everything is up and running?
Of course any Brit on this adventure would eventually end up bitching about the lack of robinsons squash, decent fish and chips and how everything is done better in the UK.
 
Old Sep 2nd 2013 | 9:29 am
  #18  
MillieF's Avatar
BE user by choice
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,854
From: A Briton, married to a Canadian, now in Fredericton.
MillieF has a reputation beyond reputeMillieF has a reputation beyond reputeMillieF has a reputation beyond reputeMillieF has a reputation beyond reputeMillieF has a reputation beyond reputeMillieF has a reputation beyond reputeMillieF has a reputation beyond reputeMillieF has a reputation beyond reputeMillieF has a reputation beyond reputeMillieF has a reputation beyond reputeMillieF has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian
I wonder if the price of cheese would be any cheaper on Mars once everything is up and running?
Of course any Brit on this adventure would eventually end up bitching about the lack of robinsons squash, decent fish and chips and how everything is done better in the UK.
You got there before me....surely the place is made of cheese...it's bound to be cheap!
 
Old Sep 2nd 2013 | 10:11 am
  #19  
Novocastrian's Avatar
Born again atheist
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,259
From: Europe (to be specified).
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

Originally Posted by MillieF
You got there before me....surely the place is made of cheese*...it's bound to be cheap!
* Err, wrong bit of the solar system.
 
Old Sep 2nd 2013 | 10:21 am
  #20  
MarkG's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,109
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
MarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

Originally Posted by Novocastrian
* Err, wrong bit of the solar system.
Indeed. Mars is composed of chocolate over a nougat and caramel core, as any fule kno.
 
Old Sep 2nd 2013 | 10:42 am
  #21  
Novocastrian's Avatar
Born again atheist
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,259
From: Europe (to be specified).
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

Originally Posted by MarkG
Indeed. Mars is composed of chocolate over a nougat and caramel core, as any fule kno.
Quite. But nonetheless, there aren't any decent bars there.
 
Old Sep 2nd 2013 | 10:54 am
  #22  
slanderer of the innocent
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC
ExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

I think it's exciting.
 
Old Sep 2nd 2013 | 12:05 pm
  #23  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 487
From: Calgary, AB
AllyS is a glorious beacon of lightAllyS is a glorious beacon of lightAllyS is a glorious beacon of lightAllyS is a glorious beacon of lightAllyS is a glorious beacon of lightAllyS is a glorious beacon of lightAllyS is a glorious beacon of lightAllyS is a glorious beacon of lightAllyS is a glorious beacon of lightAllyS is a glorious beacon of lightAllyS is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

Try the Atacama and Gobi deserts - remote and cold! Antarctica wouldn't fit the bill as protected.
 
Old Sep 2nd 2013 | 12:44 pm
  #24  
MarkG's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,109
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
MarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

Originally Posted by Novocastrian
But nonetheless, there aren't any decent bars there.
There are. They're just half the size they used to be a few years ago.
 
Old Sep 3rd 2013 | 12:08 am
  #25  
Analyst for hire
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,698
From: Toronto
Ben W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

Originally Posted by Steve_
You can't colonize Mars by definition because there isn't enough gravity to successfully have children and the life expectancy of anyone who goes there will drop off a cliff because of bone loss and other health problems (being exposed to large amounts of radiation there and in transit). All this terraforming stuff is academic, you need 1G to have children. You'd have to put a space station in orbit, spin it fast enough and the kids would have to grow up there.
I'd love to know your source for this one, that's the most unusual anti-space exploration theory I've ever come across. Can't have children because there isn't enough gravity?
 
Old Sep 3rd 2013 | 4:14 am
  #26  
Steve_'s Avatar
Grumpy Know-it-all
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,928
From: Calgary, Alberta
Steve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

Yep, you've got to have 1G to successfully have children. Look at the research into bone loss and muscle atrophy in low G or zero G environments. This is the reason why all the sci fi novels written in the last x number of years never mention it, because there's no way of explaining it away. Doesn't matter how clever you get with terraforming or whatever, you can't compensate for a lack of gravity. It takes a long time for astronauts to recover from a few months of exposure to zero G.

This is one of the main problems of getting to Mars, it's such a long journey they're not quite sure how the astronauts would survive in zero G that long, they'd have to spin the ship and even then it wouldn't be 1G.

If you tried to have children in 0.6G they wouldn't develop properly during pregnancy and would have a wide variety of birth deformities if you even got that far.

The way that's been theorized of getting around that problem would be to have children on an orbiting space station, but long-term exposure of even Earth-born humans to 0.6G would have serious health effects.

If you want to colonize a planet in the Solar System, the only real candidate is Venus, so you'd have to terraform it first which would probably take thousands of years.

Colonizing Mars is just sci-fi guff. If the pilgrims had gotten off the Mayflower and been confronted with a frigid, lifeless arid desert they wouldn't have stuck around for long, quite apart from it being airless and low gravity.
 
Old Sep 3rd 2013 | 6:17 am
  #27  
MarkG's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,109
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
MarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond reputeMarkG has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

Originally Posted by Steve_
Yep, you've got to have 1G to successfully have children. Look at the research into bone loss and muscle atrophy in low G or zero G environments.
You only need to worry about that if you want to have children who can live in 1g. It's irrelevant if those kids are going to spend their life in low gravity.

Earth's gravity is way too high for comfortable human life. Mars gravity is probably about right, since it's high enough to be useful and not high enough to be annoying. The problem is that it's not high enough to maintain a breathable atmosphere, which is another reason why trying to colonise it is a silly idea.

The future for the human race is likely to be living in free-flying habitats at 0.25-0.5g, because that seems the optimum range if you don't have to worry about holding an atmosphere down. Kids who grew up in 1g will have excessively strong muscles and bones in that environment.
 
Old Sep 3rd 2013 | 11:11 am
  #28  
Analyst for hire
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,698
From: Toronto
Ben W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond reputeBen W Bell has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

Source please.
 
Old Sep 3rd 2013 | 11:55 am
  #29  
Novocastrian's Avatar
Born again atheist
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,259
From: Europe (to be specified).
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

Originally Posted by Ben W Bell
Source please.
I doubt that either Steve or Mark can provide a valid source source for their wild assertions.
 
Old Sep 3rd 2013 | 12:28 pm
  #30  
Steve_'s Avatar
Grumpy Know-it-all
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,928
From: Calgary, Alberta
Steve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: One way trip to Mars.

Originally Posted by MarkG
You only need to worry about that if you want to have children who can live in 1g. It's irrelevant if those kids are going to spend their life in low gravity.
It's not irrelevant, they wouldn't develop properly. Genetically for example your spine can only be a certain length, in low G the spine would develop to a greater length. Your heart has to be able to pump a certain amount of blood in order to keep your cardiovascular system going, it wouldn't develop properly in low gravity, plus you would be taller, stretching out the distance the blood would have to travel. Human beings evolved in one G, you can't take a life form as complex as a human and then have them have children in 0.6 G.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.