British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Maple Leaf (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/)
-   -   milton ont (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/milton-ont-592052/)

ciarula Feb 18th 2009 4:35 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 7298517)
We can tell that from your punctuation.

surely you mean capitalization?

dbd33 Feb 18th 2009 4:42 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by ciarula (Post 7298535)
surely you mean capitalization?

No, the dangling comma. Granted though, the lack of capitalisation is insulting to the reader.

ciarula Feb 18th 2009 4:52 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 7298567)
No, the dangling comma. Granted though, the lack of capitalisation is insulting to the reader.

Good point. My apologies.

cov-canuck Feb 18th 2009 4:57 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 7298567)
No, the dangling comma. Granted though, the lack of capitalisation is insulting to the reader.

Which is more offensive: a dangling comma, or a dangling participle?

;)

iaink Feb 18th 2009 5:04 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 7298533)
Respect the Don't Call list, why doncha?

If you bother to read the small print the do not call list does not apply to newspapers and organisations you have a preexisting relationship with...

iaink Feb 18th 2009 5:06 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 7298567)
No, the dangling comma. Granted though, the lack of capitalisation is insulting to the reader.

The dangling comma was a result of my edit by the way. Good rant though...:unsure:

dbd33 Feb 18th 2009 5:07 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by iaink (Post 7298663)
If you bother to read the small print the do not call list does not apply to newspapers and organisations you have a preexisting relationship with...

Loathing Rosie DiManno's Burchill knock off column over the course of years does not constitute a preexisting relationship.

dbd33 Feb 18th 2009 5:08 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by iaink (Post 7298674)
The dangling comma was my edit by the way. Good rant though...:unsure:

In that case I should have initially gone after the txt spk.

iaink Feb 18th 2009 5:10 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 7298677)
Loathing Rosie DiManno's Burchill knock off column over the course of years does not constitute a preexisting relationship.

Perhaps not, but as far as the gov is concerned, the Star is still a newspaper, so the DNC list doesnt apply to its telimarketing....a serious flaw in the list if you ask me.

dbd33 Feb 18th 2009 5:15 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by iaink (Post 7298686)
Perhaps not, but as far as the gov is concerned, the Sun is still a newspaper, so the DNC list doesnt apply to its telimarketing....a serious flaw in the list if you ask me.

But where's the pre-existing relationship? I don't think I've ever bought a copy.

iaink Feb 18th 2009 5:17 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 7298706)
But where's the pre-existing relationship? I don't think I've ever bought a copy.

You misunderstand. Newspapers require no pre existing relationship...they are exempt from the DNC list.

Organisations you have a preexisting relationship with are ALSO exempt. ALSO charitable organsations.


Does being on the List prevent all unsolicited calls?
Being on the National DNCL keeps you from receiving most telemarketing calls, but there are exceptions. Registered charities are still allowed to call for donations, and certain other organizations-such as companies conducting polls or surveys, political parties, and newspapers looking for subscriptions-can also continue to contact you. As well, if you’ve done business with a company in the last 18 months, that company is considered to have a relationship with you and is allowed to call.
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/DNCL/brochure_consumer.htm

dbd33 Feb 18th 2009 5:22 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by iaink (Post 7298713)
You misunderstand. Newspapers require no pre existing relationship...they are exempt from the DNC list.

Organisations you have a preexisting relationship with are ALSO exempt. ALSO charitable organsations.


http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/DNCL/brochure_consumer.htm

Ah ha! Useless to me then. Telemarketers calling me usually represent the Star, the bank or the phone company. The only other one that calls more than once a week is a vehicle warranty scam.

clynnog Feb 18th 2009 6:57 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 7298730)
The only other one that calls more than once a week is a vehicle warranty scam.

I've had that annoying call about 'your final warning on your factory authorized warranty' or some such thing. Not sure which is more annoying, thaat or the 'this is your captain speaking'.

dbd33 Feb 18th 2009 7:01 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by clynnog (Post 7299091)
I've had that annoying call about 'your final warning on your factory authorized warranty' or some such thing. Not sure which is more annoying, thaat or the 'this is your captain speaking'.

I spoke to them. I explained that I have a 1987 Land Cruiser with 135,000 miles on it. The salesman said that they usually try "to catch vehicles more quickly after they fall out of warranty" but he said he would speak to his manager to see what could be arranged. The manager came on the line and, after some blather, said that they'd make an exception and provide a warranty for $580/year. The $580 could be paid right then by credit card and I'd be immediately protected.

clynnog Feb 18th 2009 7:31 am

Re: milton ont
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 7299107)
I spoke to them. I explained that I have a 1987 Land Cruiser with 135,000 miles on it. The salesman said that they usually try "to catch vehicles more quickly after they fall out of warranty" but he said he would speak to his manager to see what could be arranged. The manager came on the line and, after some blather, said that they'd make an exception and provide a warranty for $580/year. The $580 could be paid right then by credit card and I'd be immediately protected.

So it isn't only me who likes to string these grifters along as they think they have a sale.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:33 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.