![]() |
Re: Masks
Gov. Cuomo of NY made a good point re wearing masks: ‘Wear a face mask as a curtesy to others.’ :thumbsup:
|
Re: Masks
I went to Costco this morning, first time since all this Brouhaha erupted...and I had a prescription to pick up. In it's usual way they had it all sorted out...a nice little round circle on the floor with an imprint of two feet...I knew exactly what I had to do...they have dealt with the general public in all our multi faceted hues and they don't leave anything to chance ! I stepped forth with a sense of confidence...
|
Re: Masks
Further to the standing between the lines or on them, think of the lines in a car park. You park between the lines but if one car is slightly closer to the line on the right and the next car on that side is closer to the left line, they are both between the lines but so close that one driver may not be able to open the door. :lol:
Originally Posted by MillieF
(Post 12847926)
..a nice little round circle on the floor with an imprint of two feet......
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by JamesM
(Post 12847540)
There seems to be a correlation between mass outbreak and where there are underground transit/subway systems.
I haven't warn a mask yet but I think to curb outbreak in future that if people are riding the TTC for example that for now it should be a requirement. They have enforced social distancing in my building elevators where only 3 people are allowed to ride it at once unless it's a family. Perhaps return the elevators to normal but face masks are required. Outside of these enclosed environments I don't think masks are necessary- the goal in the longer term is some sort of herd immunity and our focus is really on keeping hospital submissions at a low rate. Today would be a good day to get out the Darth Vader mask for a trip to Costo, Canadian Tire. Perhaps accessorize with a light sabre to assist in enforcing 6 foot exclusion zone. |
Re: Masks
The reality of our Covid-19 lives is going to be the need to wear masks in certain circumstances - particularly when you can't maintain physical distancing - transit being a prime example. Wearing masks - home made, non-medical - is to prevent the spread not to protect the wearer. You can argue all you like against the effectiveness, the discomfort, your civil liberties (if you so choose) but mask use will be required in many places and societal pressure will cover the rest. No sir, you can't come in my store, unless you wear a mask.
Those of us who are more than averagely cranial endowed - I wear a 3XL crash helmet for example - will need custom home made masks. Mrs AX has started making some masks for us today and the standard fit is way too small for yours truly. I looked like a fatter Plug from the Beano..... :-) |
Re: Masks
Quite frankly I think it is irresponsible not to wear a mask when you are out, unless you are in a remote area.
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Cheltonian
(Post 12847358)
So how do all you glasses wearing people stop your glasses fogging up while wearing a face mask?
Originally Posted by Danny B
(Post 12847362)
I haven't tried this method for any length of time, but it seems to work when I was practising with wearing a mask.
If you fold a tissue horizontally and put it between your face and the top of your mask—so it sits over the bridge of your nose— the moisture from your breath will be absorbed by the tissue instead of hitting your glasses lenses.
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 12847420)
Put your glasses over the top edge of your mask to stop them steaming up.
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...010146d5b4.png |
Re: Masks
Thx i will try it right now, will report back.
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Cheltonian
(Post 12848251)
Thx i will try it right now, will report back.
|
Re: Masks
Seems to work, will know more when i go out at 4.00am tomorrow. Worst part was being blind for 20 mins while the specs dried out.
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Cheltonian
(Post 12848266)
Seems to work, will know more when i go out at 4.00am tomorrow. Worst part was being blind for 20 mins while the specs dried out.
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Siouxie
(Post 12847370)
You often appear to become a little contentious when people have a different opinion to you, do you not think others have undertaken research as well? Just because you think differently it doesn't make you right and them wrong.. (or vice-versa, before you jump all over that).
Sometimes your comments come across as almost deliberately challenging... for the sake of it....... or are you genuinely interested in others opinions? :sneaky: I didn't suggest that I was the only one that had undertaken research, I mentioned my research in an attempt to give context to my opinion. I am happy for others to have opinions that differ from my own and I haven't stated that anyone's position is right or wrong. If people wish to wear masks, I am perfectly happy for them to do so. I don't believe that asking questions is "deliberately challenging" and I am happy for others to act precisely how they wish. My simple point remains, there appears to be no science upon which the requirement to have to wear masks is based. Experiments that demonstrate how far droplets can travel fail to take into account that, supposedly, we are sneezing into our elbows or placing something else in the path. I anticipate that a future "requirement for the societal good" will be everybody having to install an app that shows where they have been just to ensure "...that we can tell who you have come into close contact with so that, if either of your contracts the virus, we can inform the others." The health system has not been overwhelmed. ICUs in Alberta are at about 5% capacity and the only real hotspot appears to be Quebec but, despite this, their government intends to ease the lockdown. Put simply, there are contradictions everywhere. I will cease any further posts in case you decide that my posts are "too political" and they have them hived off to a thread all of their own! |
Re: Masks
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12848359)
I anticipate that a future "requirement for the societal good" will be everybody having to install an app that shows where they have been just to ensure "...that we can tell who you have come into close contact with so that, if either of your contracts the virus, we can inform the others." |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12848359)
With the greatest of respect...
I didn't suggest that I was the only one that had undertaken research, I mentioned my research in an attempt to give context to my opinion. My simple point remains, there appears to be no science upon which the requirement to have to wear masks is based. Their usefulness is now not as played down as it was previously. I'm sure you are capable of seeing the obvious. Experiments that demonstrate how far droplets can travel fail to take into account that, supposedly, we are sneezing into our elbows or placing something else in the path. I anticipate that a future "requirement for the societal good" will be everybody having to install an app that shows where they have been just to ensure "...that we can tell who you have come into close contact with so that, if either of your contracts the virus, we can inform the others." |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:40 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.