Love you too.
#1
I am receipt of the following communication from a poster called john5655. I don't care for this sort of ad hominem attack, especially not by poison pen, or keyboard, letter. Since the originating thread is now closed I offer it here:
<snip>
Perhaps, john5655, you would like to continue the debate over driving license issuance procedures in a more professional manner in public. It reflects badly, if accurately, on your trade that you do dirty little things in secret corners.
<snip>
Perhaps, john5655, you would like to continue the debate over driving license issuance procedures in a more professional manner in public. It reflects badly, if accurately, on your trade that you do dirty little things in secret corners.
Last edited by christmasoompa; Apr 5th 2009 at 4:31 am. Reason: Text from PM removed, as per site rule no. 6
#2
I am receipt of the following communication from a poster called john5655. I don't care for this sort of ad hominem attack, especially not by poison pen, or keyboard, letter. Since the originating thread is now closed I offer it here:
<snip>
Perhaps, john5655, you would like to continue the debate over driving license issuance procedures in a more professional manner in public. It reflects badly, if accurately, on your trade that you do dirty little things in secret corners.
<snip>
Perhaps, john5655, you would like to continue the debate over driving license issuance procedures in a more professional manner in public. It reflects badly, if accurately, on your trade that you do dirty little things in secret corners.
Last edited by christmasoompa; Apr 5th 2009 at 4:32 am.
#3
I suspect this thread will be closed, with the advice that you take this to PM's.
This is really just another excuse for you to have a go at the police and the people that carry out that role really
I can't believe this is the first time you have been insulted either - ad hominen or otherwise - why publicise this one?
This is really just another excuse for you to have a go at the police and the people that carry out that role really

I can't believe this is the first time you have been insulted either - ad hominen or otherwise - why publicise this one?
#4
I suspect this thread will be closed, with the advice that you take this to PM's.
This is really just another excuse for you to have a go at the police and the people that carry out that role really
I can't believe this is the first time you have been insulted either - ad hominen or otherwise - why publicise this one?
This is really just another excuse for you to have a go at the police and the people that carry out that role really

I can't believe this is the first time you have been insulted either - ad hominen or otherwise - why publicise this one?
#8










Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,883

Site rule number 6.
I'm rather surprised the thread is still here.
I'm rather surprised the thread is still here.
#9







Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,139

Is it me, or aren't there an awful lot of threads being closed these days? I'm not online during working hours at the moment, by the time I log on sometimes it seems the discussion has been shot down already. Just an observation.
#10










Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,609
From: Ontario











#12
IMHO i feel we should be able to have a balance of opinion and not just get cut off when things get a bit heated........after all i thought it was supposed to be a "discussion" forum

If somebody gets "hate mail" then why shouldn't they have the right to bring it up on here ?
If we all had the same opinions then this forum would be very boring indeed !
#13
The only threads that are deleted or closed are those that break rules, or that we get numerous valid complaints about. Simple as that.
And, as this one clearly breaks site rule no. 6, I am closing it for that very reason. Sorry peeps!







