Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Canada > The Maple Leaf
Reload this Page >

Kings-edgehill school

Wikiposts

Kings-edgehill school

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 7th 2007 | 4:41 am
  #46  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,457
terese677 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Kings-edgehill school

Judy, you do a great job in supporting the people on this site with information and encouragement in my opinion you weren't rude at all just genuinely trying to help........carry on the good work
Terese
 
Old Dec 8th 2007 | 3:31 pm
  #47  
Novocastrian's Avatar
Born again atheist
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,259
From: Europe (to be specified).
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Kings-edgehill school

Novo, you know that you and I are of one mind on many issues. But I think you've gone a bit over the top here.

Mind you, the one wild card that I'm never sure about is British humour. I look at something, am about to respond, then stop and think, "No, hold on a minute. This may be a trap. It may be BH."
Over the top is an integral part of British Humour. BH on the other hand stands for Brusthalter and is measured in centimetres.



Originally Posted by Oakvillian

I suspect Novo's post may have more to do with a political/ideological exception to the principles of private schooling - but I may be way off-beam, in which case, Novo, I apologise.
No need to apologize, you are correct.


However, I don't think I'd contemplate private education for my own children, even less so in Canada than the UK.
I think that's what I was saying.

My view is that, under the Canadian system, our children will actually develop greater independence of spirit in the public system than by going private.
Precisely.

Last edited by Novocastrian; Dec 8th 2007 at 3:34 pm.
 
Old Dec 8th 2007 | 3:36 pm
  #48  
Judy in Calgary's Avatar
Now on Vancouver Island
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,935
From: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada
Judy in Calgary has a reputation beyond reputeJudy in Calgary has a reputation beyond reputeJudy in Calgary has a reputation beyond reputeJudy in Calgary has a reputation beyond reputeJudy in Calgary has a reputation beyond reputeJudy in Calgary has a reputation beyond reputeJudy in Calgary has a reputation beyond reputeJudy in Calgary has a reputation beyond reputeJudy in Calgary has a reputation beyond reputeJudy in Calgary has a reputation beyond reputeJudy in Calgary has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Kings-edgehill school

Originally Posted by Novocastrian
Over the top is an integral part of British Humour.
Thanks for the clarification (if the clarification can be trusted and is not, itself, part of British Humour ).

I have added it to my growing notebook about British Humour.

Hold your breath for another Wiki.

Just kidding. That is one Wiki that I will never attempt.
 
Old Dec 8th 2007 | 3:55 pm
  #49  
Novocastrian's Avatar
Born again atheist
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,259
From: Europe (to be specified).
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Kings-edgehill school

OK, I think I owe a slightly less flippant response.

As Oak and a couple of other folk on here know, I "benefited" from what some might refer to as a privileged educational track.

Point one: this was never paid for from family resources, i.e merit (in their own terms) scholarships all the way.

Point the tooth, it has served me well...I'd be hypocritical to deny it.

Point three: I am still dealing with the traumas of the experience.

Point four: I have two grown sons both of whom have been educated in Canada in the public system, and who are both considerably more rounded individuals than I will ever be.

Point five: Canada would be much better off with a more highly developed class system.

BH again, Judy.
 
Old Dec 9th 2007 | 2:14 am
  #50  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,124
montreal mike has a reputation beyond reputemontreal mike has a reputation beyond reputemontreal mike has a reputation beyond reputemontreal mike has a reputation beyond reputemontreal mike has a reputation beyond reputemontreal mike has a reputation beyond reputemontreal mike has a reputation beyond reputemontreal mike has a reputation beyond reputemontreal mike has a reputation beyond reputemontreal mike has a reputation beyond reputemontreal mike has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Kings-edgehill school

Since we somehow gotten on to the topic of flippancy, I would be remiss if I did not add my 2 cents here.

Some here see some merit in private schooling. I do for one.

However one of the benefits not mentioned so far, and for the life of me I fail to see why this has been overlooked, is that private schools will, under certain dire circumstances, act as a temporary safe haven for the offspring of despots who themselves are in the process of being overthrown by other would be despots.

Just imagine this scenario: Emperor, King, Head Honcho. Supreme Ruler, or president-for-life in some tin pot little country gets overthrown and while he rots in gaol, or is being disposed of (need I provide the gory details?), at least his pampered his kids are safe and sound thousands of miles away.

This represents a serious dilemma for the school administration which has just tearfully broken to these little darlings the grim news and thirty seconds later lets them know, in the most compassionate of tones, that henceforth they are in effect 'persona non grata' as the bills for their upkeep are no longer likely to be paid.

Problems, problems! But then again who says life is easy?

Last edited by montreal mike; Dec 9th 2007 at 2:23 am. Reason: adding even more sarcasm
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.