Iron Lady
#32
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Somewhere between Vancouver & St Johns
Posts: 19,872
Re: Iron Lady
Isnt it nice to be able to sit back and armchair quarterback after the fact or events have taken place.
What was she supposed to do put it to a general vote? let Parliament decide?
do nothing?
What would you have done or is that not a fair question to ask of you?
If you can ask these questions of the leaders then why should the question not be asked of you?
I mean we are all questioning Harper here and the opposition is quite happy to sit back and be critical and suggest that they might do this or that but if it came down to the crunch would they?
As Canada doesnt have claims to any other countries I guess its a scenario we will never see Canadian politicians faced with.
So how is your campaign to be the next Canadian leader going?
What was she supposed to do put it to a general vote? let Parliament decide?
do nothing?
What would you have done or is that not a fair question to ask of you?
If you can ask these questions of the leaders then why should the question not be asked of you?
I mean we are all questioning Harper here and the opposition is quite happy to sit back and be critical and suggest that they might do this or that but if it came down to the crunch would they?
As Canada doesnt have claims to any other countries I guess its a scenario we will never see Canadian politicians faced with.
So how is your campaign to be the next Canadian leader going?
#33
Re: Iron Lady
Isnt it nice to be able to sit back and armchair quarterback after the fact or events have taken place.
What was she supposed to do put it to a general vote? let Parliament decide?
do nothing?
What would you have done or is that not a fair question to ask of you?
If you can ask these questions of the leaders then why should the question not be asked of you?
I mean we are all questioning Harper here and the opposition is quite happy to sit back and be critical and suggest that they might do this or that but if it came down to the crunch would they?
As Canada doesnt have claims to any other countries I guess its a scenario we will never see Canadian politicians faced with.
So how is your campaign to be the next Canadian leader going?
What was she supposed to do put it to a general vote? let Parliament decide?
do nothing?
What would you have done or is that not a fair question to ask of you?
If you can ask these questions of the leaders then why should the question not be asked of you?
I mean we are all questioning Harper here and the opposition is quite happy to sit back and be critical and suggest that they might do this or that but if it came down to the crunch would they?
As Canada doesnt have claims to any other countries I guess its a scenario we will never see Canadian politicians faced with.
So how is your campaign to be the next Canadian leader going?
#34
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Somewhere between Vancouver & St Johns
Posts: 19,872
Re: Iron Lady
Are you drawing a parallel between Thatcher's invasion of the Falklands and Harper's dabbling in the Middle East? I think that's a bit strong. Were it not for his religiosity and his BMI, I'd think Harper clearly less loathsome than Thatcher. He's a nasty piece of work but, AFAIK, he hasn't killed anyone he knew to be running away.
I was asking if you were in Maggies shoes what would you have done?
Who was running away and what are you referring to?
Did Canada go to the Middle East as part of their NATO responsibilities or are you suggesting Harper was dabbling in his own bit of war mongering.
And Im no great fan of Harper either.
#35
Re: Iron Lady
Rhodesia, for example. Britain's policies in respect of Rhodesia have not been influenced by the likely outcome for the people of that country. If we believe that the defence of the Falklands was motivated by an altruistic interest in the well being of the people, or indeed, sheep, resident there then it's unique in colonial history (perhaps all colonial history, not just ours).
#36
Re: Iron Lady
Gurkhas then, the British government is, properly, unconcerned with their fate. Non-Muslim Pakistanis. Palestinians, we don't send an army to beat back those awful Israelis because they oppress our former subjects. We, as a nation, create havoc and walk away. The Falklands is exceptional and I don't believe it's because the inhabitants are particularly lovable. White, but not lovable.
#37
Re: Iron Lady
Magaret Thatcher and the Belgrano. Literally, "sailing" rather than "running".
I wasn't suggesting anything about Harper, except that I think him a fat bigot, I was struggling to grasp why you brought him up. As always, the relevance of Canada is lost on me.
#38
Re: Iron Lady
When that is exactly what happened she should have followed Carrington's example and left.
On another topic: Cabinet papers from 1981 have been released under the 30 year rule, you might be interested in this article...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/de...ool-riots-1981
#39
Re: Iron Lady
In a war zone, (Irrrespective of whether the war was just) a significant enemy naval asset was in a position to be a threat to the UK task force. Which direction it was heading when sunk is largely irrelevent.
#40
Re: Iron Lady
When was Pakistan invaded in the last 100 years?
Palestinians, we don't send an army to beat back those awful Israelis because they oppress our former subjects. We, as a nation, create havoc and walk away. The Falklands is exceptional and I don't believe it's because the inhabitants are particularly lovable. White, but not lovable.
Tell me, what land in that region belongs to whom and on what authority? If you have an answer to that one, you are wasted being a part owner of a computer service corporation
#41
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Somewhere between Vancouver & St Johns
Posts: 19,872
Re: Iron Lady
She should have resigned. If she had listened to the advice from the FO that withdrawing the only naval vessel showing the flag in the Falklands would be seen as sign of disinterest by the Argentinian government and as an invitation to Galtieri to invade.
When that is exactly what happened she should have followed Carrington's example and left.
On another topic: Cabinet papers from 1981 have been released under the 30 year rule, you might be interested in this article...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/de...ool-riots-1981
When that is exactly what happened she should have followed Carrington's example and left.
On another topic: Cabinet papers from 1981 have been released under the 30 year rule, you might be interested in this article...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/de...ool-riots-1981
Maybe you read over this as well regarding the Belgrano though I accept it is
dbd33 making those claims about it running away.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...rs-reveal.html
#43
Re: Iron Lady
I believe it is accepted on this forum that you don't care much for military intervention but, let's say, if London was invaded by a foreign force, do you believe that the UK government should do anything, or just leave Londoners to sort it out themselves?
#44
Re: Iron Lady
Yes I saw that and personaly was put on standby again for those riots.
Maybe you read over this as well regarding the Belgrano though I accept it is
dbd33 making those claims about it running away.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...rs-reveal.html
Maybe you read over this as well regarding the Belgrano though I accept it is
dbd33 making those claims about it running away.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...rs-reveal.html
#45
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Somewhere between Vancouver & St Johns
Posts: 19,872
Re: Iron Lady
The Berlin wall was blocking my view