Iron Lady

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 16th 2012, 1:00 am
  #31  
Assimilated Pauper
 
dbd33's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 40,022
dbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
Have you asked the residents of the Falklands how they felt about being invaded.
I don't see the need, I don't suppose they cared for it but my point is that they didn't, and don't, matter to the UK government. They just got lucky.
dbd33 is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2012, 1:11 am
  #32  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Somewhere between Vancouver & St Johns
Posts: 19,872
Former Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Isnt it nice to be able to sit back and armchair quarterback after the fact or events have taken place.
What was she supposed to do put it to a general vote? let Parliament decide?
do nothing?

What would you have done or is that not a fair question to ask of you?
If you can ask these questions of the leaders then why should the question not be asked of you?
I mean we are all questioning Harper here and the opposition is quite happy to sit back and be critical and suggest that they might do this or that but if it came down to the crunch would they?
As Canada doesnt have claims to any other countries I guess its a scenario we will never see Canadian politicians faced with.

So how is your campaign to be the next Canadian leader going?
Former Lancastrian is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2012, 1:19 am
  #33  
Assimilated Pauper
 
dbd33's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 40,022
dbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian
Isnt it nice to be able to sit back and armchair quarterback after the fact or events have taken place.
What was she supposed to do put it to a general vote? let Parliament decide?
do nothing?

What would you have done or is that not a fair question to ask of you?
If you can ask these questions of the leaders then why should the question not be asked of you?
I mean we are all questioning Harper here and the opposition is quite happy to sit back and be critical and suggest that they might do this or that but if it came down to the crunch would they?
As Canada doesnt have claims to any other countries I guess its a scenario we will never see Canadian politicians faced with.

So how is your campaign to be the next Canadian leader going?
Are you drawing a parallel between Thatcher's invasion of the Falklands and Harper's dabbling in the Middle East? I think that's a bit strong. Were it not for his religiosity and his BMI, I'd think Harper clearly less loathsome than Thatcher. He's a nasty piece of work but, AFAIK, he hasn't killed anyone he knew to be running away.
dbd33 is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2012, 1:24 am
  #34  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Somewhere between Vancouver & St Johns
Posts: 19,872
Former Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Originally Posted by dbd33
Are you drawing a parallel between Thatcher's invasion of the Falklands and Harper's dabbling in the Middle East? I think that's a bit strong. Were it not for his religiosity and his BMI, I'd think Harper clearly less loathsome than Thatcher. He's a nasty piece of work but, AFAIK, he hasn't killed anyone he knew to be running away.
Drawing a parallel no not at all 2 completely different scenarios.
I was asking if you were in Maggies shoes what would you have done?
Who was running away and what are you referring to?
Did Canada go to the Middle East as part of their NATO responsibilities or are you suggesting Harper was dabbling in his own bit of war mongering.
And Im no great fan of Harper either.
Former Lancastrian is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2012, 1:24 am
  #35  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Almost Canadian's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: South of Calgary
Posts: 13,378
Almost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Originally Posted by dbd33
Rhodesia, for example. Britain's policies in respect of Rhodesia have not been influenced by the likely outcome for the people of that country. If we believe that the defence of the Falklands was motivated by an altruistic interest in the well being of the people, or indeed, sheep, resident there then it's unique in colonial history (perhaps all colonial history, not just ours).
Yes, I can see how the two situations were very similar.
Almost Canadian is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2012, 1:44 am
  #36  
Assimilated Pauper
 
dbd33's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 40,022
dbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
Yes, I can see how the two situations were very similar.
Gurkhas then, the British government is, properly, unconcerned with their fate. Non-Muslim Pakistanis. Palestinians, we don't send an army to beat back those awful Israelis because they oppress our former subjects. We, as a nation, create havoc and walk away. The Falklands is exceptional and I don't believe it's because the inhabitants are particularly lovable. White, but not lovable.
dbd33 is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2012, 1:49 am
  #37  
Assimilated Pauper
 
dbd33's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 40,022
dbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian
Drawing a parallel no not at all 2 completely different scenarios.
I was asking if you were in Maggies shoes what would you have done?
Negotiated a settlement, looking to Hong Kong as an example.

Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian
Who was running away and what are you referring to?
Magaret Thatcher and the Belgrano. Literally, "sailing" rather than "running".

Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian
Did Canada go to the Middle East as part of their NATO responsibilities or are you suggesting Harper was dabbling in his own bit of war mongering.
And Im no great fan of Harper either.
I wasn't suggesting anything about Harper, except that I think him a fat bigot, I was struggling to grasp why you brought him up. As always, the relevance of Canada is lost on me.
dbd33 is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2012, 1:53 am
  #38  
Born again atheist
 
Novocastrian's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Europe (to be specified).
Posts: 30,259
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian
I was asking if you were in Maggies shoes what would you have done?
She should have resigned. If she had listened to the advice from the FO that withdrawing the only naval vessel showing the flag in the Falklands would be seen as sign of disinterest by the Argentinian government and as an invitation to Galtieri to invade.

When that is exactly what happened she should have followed Carrington's example and left.

On another topic: Cabinet papers from 1981 have been released under the 30 year rule, you might be interested in this article...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/de...ool-riots-1981
Novocastrian is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2012, 1:56 am
  #39  
Slightly Canadian
 
Atlantic Xpat's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Posts: 10,129
Atlantic Xpat has a reputation beyond reputeAtlantic Xpat has a reputation beyond reputeAtlantic Xpat has a reputation beyond reputeAtlantic Xpat has a reputation beyond reputeAtlantic Xpat has a reputation beyond reputeAtlantic Xpat has a reputation beyond reputeAtlantic Xpat has a reputation beyond reputeAtlantic Xpat has a reputation beyond reputeAtlantic Xpat has a reputation beyond reputeAtlantic Xpat has a reputation beyond reputeAtlantic Xpat has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Originally Posted by dbd33
Magaret Thatcher and the Belgrano. Literally, "sailing" rather than "running".
In a war zone, (Irrrespective of whether the war was just) a significant enemy naval asset was in a position to be a threat to the UK task force. Which direction it was heading when sunk is largely irrelevent.
Atlantic Xpat is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2012, 1:57 am
  #40  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Almost Canadian's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: South of Calgary
Posts: 13,378
Almost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Originally Posted by dbd33
Gurkhas then, the British government is, properly, unconcerned with their fate.
When was Nepal invaded in the last 100 years?

Originally Posted by dbd33
Non-Muslim Pakistanis.
When was Pakistan invaded in the last 100 years?

Originally Posted by dbd33
Palestinians, we don't send an army to beat back those awful Israelis because they oppress our former subjects. We, as a nation, create havoc and walk away. The Falklands is exceptional and I don't believe it's because the inhabitants are particularly lovable. White, but not lovable.
I am sure that you will accept that the issues in that part of the Middle East predate Thatcher, in fact, they likely pre date civilization in the UK.

Tell me, what land in that region belongs to whom and on what authority? If you have an answer to that one, you are wasted being a part owner of a computer service corporation
Almost Canadian is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2012, 1:58 am
  #41  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Somewhere between Vancouver & St Johns
Posts: 19,872
Former Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Originally Posted by Novocastrian
She should have resigned. If she had listened to the advice from the FO that withdrawing the only naval vessel showing the flag in the Falklands would be seen as sign of disinterest by the Argentinian government and as an invitation to Galtieri to invade.

When that is exactly what happened she should have followed Carrington's example and left.

On another topic: Cabinet papers from 1981 have been released under the 30 year rule, you might be interested in this article...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/de...ool-riots-1981
Yes I saw that and personaly was put on standby again for those riots.
Maybe you read over this as well regarding the Belgrano though I accept it is
dbd33 making those claims about it running away.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...rs-reveal.html
Former Lancastrian is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2012, 2:05 am
  #42  
Assimilated Pauper
 
dbd33's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 40,022
dbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
Tell me, what land in that region belongs to whom and on what authority?
I'm not about to declare true ownership of land anywhere. However, were I to presume a divine right to decide, I can't imagine starting with a speck in the South Atlantic.
dbd33 is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2012, 2:10 am
  #43  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Almost Canadian's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: South of Calgary
Posts: 13,378
Almost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Originally Posted by dbd33
I'm not about to declare true ownership of land anywhere. However, were I to presume a divine right to decide, I can't imagine starting with a speck in the South Atlantic.
Maybe you wouldn't want to live there, but the residents there, evidently, do. I am sure that I do not need to point out to you that, at the time of the Falklands War, the UK was responsible for its defence and foreign affairs.

I believe it is accepted on this forum that you don't care much for military intervention but, let's say, if London was invaded by a foreign force, do you believe that the UK government should do anything, or just leave Londoners to sort it out themselves?
Almost Canadian is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2012, 2:12 am
  #44  
Born again atheist
 
Novocastrian's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Europe (to be specified).
Posts: 30,259
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian
Yes I saw that and personaly was put on standby again for those riots.
Maybe you read over this as well regarding the Belgrano though I accept it is
dbd33 making those claims about it running away.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...rs-reveal.html
You're right that it wasn't me. I have no personal knowledge of which way the Belgrano was pointing. On the day in question I was driving through Yellowstone National Park. The snow banks prevented a clear view of the Falklands from there.
Novocastrian is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2012, 2:16 am
  #45  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Somewhere between Vancouver & St Johns
Posts: 19,872
Former Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iron Lady

Originally Posted by Novocastrian
You're right that it wasn't me. I have no personal knowledge of which way the Belgrano was pointing. On the day in question I was driving through Yellowstone National Park. The snow banks prevented a clear view of the Falklands from there.
The Berlin wall was blocking my view
Former Lancastrian is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.