![]() |
Re: Important Question.
Surely not every front loader is better than the good top loaders? Given the price difference I would find it hard to justify buying a front loader.
I like the short times of the wash, that they wash oil and soot from husband's work clothes. I don't find holes in the fabric. My biggest beef with laundry here is that the detergents rip the colour from the clothes. |
Re: Important Question.
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 10723672)
And yet when so many people holding similar experiences on other issues...let's say something like "life in Canada" is used to reinforce a particular view, it's dismissed as just an attempt at justifying their decision to move to Canada.
Just saying..... ;) |
Re: Important Question.
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 10723642)
Are you saying that top loaders don't ruin clothes more than front loaders? It looks like you are, can you cite any evidence (other than your own opinion) for this?
Anecdotal it might be, but the amount of clothes ruined in the wash while I was using a top loader was far higher than when using a front loader. T-shirts stretched, holes put in things etc. The fact that so many people have this experience indicates to me that there is something to it. SWMBO on the other hand is most fastidious about such matters and has never commented on the difference (if any). Which end of the egg do you open? |
Re: Important Question.
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 10723680)
What other issues?
I'm sure I don't really need to spell it out do I? |
Re: Important Question.
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 10723688)
The one I mentioned.
I'm sure I don't really need to spell it out do I? And while you are at it, perhaps you can explain to me why you think that something that is objectively measurable is the same as something that is subjective opinion. |
Re: Important Question.
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 10723702)
And while you are at it, perhaps you can explain to me why you think that something that is objectively measurable is the same as something that is subjective opinion. I have an open mind on this as AlmostC would say. |
Re: Important Question.
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 10723702)
Yes. I do. Show me this "life in Canada" thing?
And while you are at it, perhaps you can explain to me why you think that something that is objectively measurable is the same as something that is subjective opinion. Nice try. |
Re: Important Question.
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 10723715)
I was going to answer but the fact you are trying to make one appear different to the other tells me you know exactly what I'm on about otherwise you wouldn't try to identify it as different.
Nice try. |
Re: Important Question.
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 10723719)
No I really don't know what you are talking about.
Ah well.... |
Re: Important Question.
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 10723704)
Can you find a link to the objective measurability of the higher incidence of ruined clothes in top vs front opening eggs, err washers?
I have an open mind on this as AlmostC would say. |
Re: Important Question.
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 10723729)
And yet you can tell me I'm wrong about it.
Ah well.... |
Re: Important Question.
on a slight tangent, it tickles me how north americans think the British are weird for having their washer dryers in the kitchen.
When hid asked why we did that I just said we were poor and couldn't afford the luxury of a room specifically for laundry ;) |
Re: Important Question.
Originally Posted by thistlehollyberry
(Post 10723676)
One downside to front loaders is that you need to leave the door open between washes. I didn't and ended up with mold all over the rubber seal. I think this could be a child safety issue.
Plus it's a swedish brand and Swedes are hot. |
Re: Important Question.
Originally Posted by mandymoochops
(Post 10723741)
on a slight tangent, it tickles me how north americans think the British are weird for having their washer dryers in the kitchen.
When hid asked why we did that I just said we were poor and couldn't afford the luxury of a room specifically for laundry ;) |
Re: Important Question.
Originally Posted by ExKiwilass
(Post 10723753)
not mine! No rubber ring. Asko, I tells ya. Asko.
Plus it's a swedish brand and Swedes are hot. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:29 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.