Hockey 2010
#32
Born again atheist
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Europe (to be specified).
Posts: 30,259
#33
Re: Hockey 2010
What is with the Candy Cane sticks? that should be the number one rule change. It will open up the passing aspect of the game a lot.
#34
Re: Hockey 2010
Last edited by Alberta_Rose; Mar 5th 2010 at 2:47 am.
#36
Re: Hockey 2010
Once I had the chance to drop Rugby (It was compulsory in the first couple of years) Hockey was a no brainer. I got quite good, Uni 1st XI, county teams etc.
They don't appear to be able to fill the place no matter who is playing. It wasn't anywhere near full for the evening prime time game between England and Pakistan either.
You seem like you are knowledgeable on the sport and you understand how big Iced hockey is in Canada, so why do you think Grassed Hockey is virtually unknown in Canada? How do we manage to play in the world cup finals when I bet less than 1% of Canadians could name one member on the team? Doesn't make much sense to me. Also, 6-0 seems like an ass kicking, is that considered a good result against the Krauts? Are the Germans a top ranked team?
You seem like you are knowledgeable on the sport and you understand how big Iced hockey is in Canada, so why do you think Grassed Hockey is virtually unknown in Canada? How do we manage to play in the world cup finals when I bet less than 1% of Canadians could name one member on the team? Doesn't make much sense to me. Also, 6-0 seems like an ass kicking, is that considered a good result against the Krauts? Are the Germans a top ranked team?
Short head makes for better ball control, and the hooked ones are very good for dragging the ball. You have to use only one face of the stick, so the ability to turn the head over the ball is critical to dribbling fast. A long flat ice hockey style head just doesnt work for that. If someone came up with an ice hockey stick with a similar short head design and perfected field hockey dribbling skills it would confuse the hell out of the defence men and goalies Passing isnt a problem, I dont really know why (ice) hockey players need a foot long head to aim for, a decent player will take the puck on the same inch of the stick everytime anyway
Last edited by iaink; Mar 5th 2010 at 5:20 pm.
#39
Re: Hockey 2010
Short head makes for better ball control, and the hooked ones are very good for dragging the ball. You have to use only one face of the stick, so the ability to turn the head over the ball is critical to dribbling fast. A long flat ice hockey style head just doesnt work for that. If someone came up with an ice hockey stick with a similar short head design and perfected field hockey dribbling skills it would confuse the hell out of the defence men and goalies Passing isnt a problem, I dont really know why (ice) hockey players need a foot long head to aim for, a decent player fill take the puck on the same inch of the stick anyway
#40
Re: Hockey 2010
The only thing I can think that the longer toe would help with is deflecting a shot on target while screening in front of the keeper, but as you say, different games.
The whole backhand / reverse thing is the biggest difference... I dont think all those left handed (ice) hockey players would be too thrilled to have to change now! All field hockey stick are right handed.... gets too dangerous to go in for the ball if you dont know which side you are going to get whacked from if they try and hit it while you are going for it. Full on hit seem relatively rare in (ice) hockey, apart from slap shots that your tend to see coming a mile off, its all push and flick movements.
Last edited by iaink; Mar 5th 2010 at 3:15 pm.
#45
Re: Hockey 2010
So I wouldn't be able to play grassed hockey. I shoot left, even though I am conservative.