|
Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
I say go for it Harry if you truly love each other marry Meghan Markle.
Now wouldn't that be something else to shake up the Establishment and get the UK gutter press all in a tizzy. We get it British press — Meghan Markle is biracial - CBC News | Opinion If they tell you you can't because she is errr not the pedigree we see in a future wife then tell them to naff off. This line from the article spells it out Johnson also made a point of describing Markle's mother as "a dreadlocked African-American lady from the wrong side of the tracks," which is only slightly more subtle than writing "MEGHAN MARKLE IS BLACK" in 20-point font. So go for it Harry what have you got to lose? Well being the King possibly but do you really care that much about being the King? Live the life you want to live not what the Establishment dictates you should live. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
I shouldn't think 'the Establishment' will give two hoots if he marries her (heirs to the throne can get away with wild behaviour and marrying those considered less suitable - see Princess Margaret's life for a similar story!).
The press might, but if it shakes the bloody Daily Mail up (it was in there that her mother was described in such an awful way I think) then that can only be a good thing IMO. Only thing is, she's a bit ugly isn't she? I mean really, could he not have found somebody that looks a bit better than her. :sarcasm: |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by christmasoompa
(Post 12109760)
Only thing is, she's a bit ugly isn't she? I mean really, could he not have found somebody that looks a bit better than her. :sarcasm:
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Yeah, why not go for it Harry, just make sure its a solid pre-nup
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian
(Post 12109756)
I say go for it Harry if you truly love each other marry Meghan Markle.
Now wouldn't that be something else to shake up the Establishment and get the UK gutter press all in a tizzy. We get it British press — Meghan Markle is biracial - CBC News | Opinion If they tell you you can't because she is errr not the pedigree we see in a future wife then tell them to naff off. This line from the article spells it out Johnson also made a point of describing Markle's mother as "a dreadlocked African-American lady from the wrong side of the tracks," which is only slightly more subtle than writing "MEGHAN MARKLE IS BLACK" in 20-point font. So go for it Harry what have you got to lose? Well being the King possibly but do you really care that much about being the King? Live the life you want to live not what the Establishment dictates you should live. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
It won't happen.
It takes two to rumble and the girl, if she became a threat, would be made to feel so awkward and out of her depth that she would decline any offer. The family would freeze her out, they've had lots of practice. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
I like Harry. A bit of character compared to his drip of a brother. Harry for King I say, and all hail Queen Meghan.
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by dave_j
(Post 12109797)
It won't happen.
It takes two to rumble and the girl, if she became a threat, would be made to feel so awkward and out of her depth that she would decline any offer. The family would freeze her out, they've had lots of practice. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12109798)
I like Harry. A bit of character compared to his drip of a brother. Harry for King I say, and all hail Queen Meghan.
Meghan Markle is super hot! However given the choice id still take Kate....she is the epitome of a woman.....stunningly gorgeous, intelligent, and what seems like a wonderfully genuine personality... Ahh sigh!! lol |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 12109796)
Why marry her? tbh although she's hot now, she's getting on a bit. If he wants kids then find someone younger and English to marry.
As for kids, my wife is the same age as her, and the doctor literally said to us, tick tock, tick tock about having kids. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
These two will be getting married, mark my words. You don't issue a statement like that if you're only looking for a shag every few weeks. She's a keeper.
I've never been a close watcher of the Royal's, but I will definitely tune in and watch this Royal Wedding on TV. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
I have no idea who this young woamn is, but her photo shows that odd pout thing that they all pose in photos these days.
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by BEVS
(Post 12110083)
I have no idea who this young woamn is, but her photo shows that odd pout thing that they all pose in photos these days.
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Show me a bloke who's married to a pretty girl and I'll show you a bloke who's bored shagging it. :(
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 12110158)
Show me a bloke who's married to a pretty girl and I'll show you a bloke who's bored shagging it. :(
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 12110158)
Show me a bloke who's married to a pretty girl and I'll show you a bloke who's bored shagging it. :(
I just looked this girl up, and she looks a pretty and lively type who would enliven the Royal Family splendidly. I'm not an uber fan of the extended Royals, but would find myself agreeing with FL - it's a Go For It from me too::thumbup: |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
The UK press once again excels itself.
I did check out MM again though. Still looks a bit ordinary air brushed celeb to me. I like the sound of her mum though :whistle::thumb::demon: |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Pizzawheel
(Post 12111700)
The UK press once again excels itself.
I did check out MM again though. Still looks a bit ordinary air brushed celeb to me. I like the sound of her mum though :whistle::thumb::demon: |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
The internet has exploded because last night they were both spotted in Battersea buying a Christmas tree together...still no friggin photos though. That palace statement seems to have worked.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Were Finally Spotted Together | Observer |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Great news today, cannot wait for the wedding.
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Danny B
(Post 12389702)
Great news today, cannot wait for the wedding.
We have seen too many arranged marriages in the past that never work out. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 12109796)
Why marry her? tbh although she's hot now, she's getting on a bit.
Doesn't he even have a surname? |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
If the UK taxpayers are picking up the bill for this wedding, it should at least be a public holiday.
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Mrs May is most likely behind the marriage to cover over the OBRs 20 years of recession.
At least they managed to find that Meghan is related to the Bowes Lyons even if her mother is a yoga teacher. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by philat98
(Post 12389949)
Mrs May is most likely behind the marriage to cover over the OBRs 20 years of recession.
At least they managed to find that Meghan is related to the Bowes Lyons even if her mother is a yoga teacher. I've been a-googling and it turns out that the Harry involved is one Harry Saxe-Coburg und Gotha. Yes. He should really marry an English woman. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 12389836)
If the UK taxpayers are picking up the bill for this wedding, it should at least be a public holiday.
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Danny B
(Post 12390393)
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
I think EU should be paying. A kind of goodbye gift.
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Danny B
(Post 12390393)
Thats that settled then. :thumbup: However Im sure there will more sour grapes comments arriving shortly. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Danny B
(Post 12390393)
They ain't and it won't be a day off.
But it is a touchy subject and one recognised by the note on the card. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Good luck to them. Bloody hard enough these days to sustain any marriage let alone one that will be in full view of the press, criticised, scrutinised and analysed.
Being papped might seem glamorous at first, but I'm sure it gets very tiring very quickly. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by dave_j
(Post 12390405)
Pardon... so all those hangers on who receive the dole from the civil list, and the grace and favour homes, and the cash ladled out to the family itself and the police who'll be out if force to keep the riff raff at arms length, all paid for by Charles et al from their own pockets? I don't think so.
But it is a touchy subject and one recognised by the note on the card. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Lorna at Vicenza
(Post 12390472)
Good luck to them. Bloody hard enough these days to sustain any marriage let alone one that will be in full view of the press, criticised, scrutinised and analysed.
Being papped might seem glamorous at first, but I'm sure it gets very tiring very quickly. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 12390484)
Surely not this tired old chestnut again. I'm no huge royalist, but there have been countless reports and studies that very clearly demonstrate that the net financial benefit to the UK of all the royalty stuff (including, presumably, the thousands of tourists who will be spending their hard-earned in Windsor next May as they hope for a glimpse of the Ginger One and his new bride) far outweighs the cost of the Civil List etc.
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12390495)
Some polished chesnuts, perhaps?
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 12390511)
Not sure what that's supposed to mean. Even the notoriously anti-monarchist Independent was a bit sniffy about some dodgy maths by anti-monarchist campaign groups such as Republic a couple of years ago. The general consensus, as far as there is such a thing, seems to be more or less in line with the Huffington Post's report here Royals Vs Republicans: Does The Royal Family Really Pay For Itself? which suggests that the net economic benefit in 2015 was somewhere in the region of 750 million pounds.
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
I saw an article today which suggests they may move into a 7.5 million pound house after they get married.
Would it kill them to show a bit of understanding that, for 95% of the population who pay for their lifestyle, life is pretty damned hard? Do they really NEED to live the pampered lives they do? Anyway, the very best of luck to them as individuals, and hell mend them all as an institution. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 12390484)
Surely not this tired old chestnut again. I'm no huge royalist, but there have been countless reports and studies that very clearly demonstrate that the net financial benefit to the UK of all the royalty stuff (including, presumably, the thousands of tourists who will be spending their hard-earned in Windsor next May as they hope for a glimpse of the Ginger One and his new bride) far outweighs the cost of the Civil List etc.
|
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 12390523)
I saw an article today which suggests they may move into a 7.5 million pound house after they get married.
Would it kill them to show a bit of understanding that, for 95% of the population who pay for their lifestyle, life is pretty damned hard? Do they really NEED to live the pampered lives they do? Anyway, the very best of luck to them as individuals, and hell mend them all as an institution. |
Re: Go for it Harry marry Meghan.
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12390540)
If it's in London, 7.5 MN is not that grand a place, considering their status.
Why should they assume that luxury is a default status? |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:24 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.