View Poll Results: Should Marius be allowed to live his life?!
Yes, he's a good chap



19
79.17%
No, the big cats are hungry



5
20.83%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll
Giraffe
#1
There's no logic to it, but I'm on Marius' side. Let him live!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-26098935
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-26098935
#2
Maybe a stupid question.. If it is Marius getting frisky with the ladies that they're trying to avoid, can't they just castrate the little fella?
#6
They should return him to the wild, in the Scandinavian forests. As Sting said, if you love someone, set them free. Preferably with their balls still attached.
#7
I don't particularly like zoos at the best of times, but surely part of their existence is to showcase, save, breed and educate, and then of course make some money.
Destroying a healthy and reasonably rare animal seems daft to me. Sure, transport is stressful (and they never worry about that when bringing in new animals
), but it doesn't sound like they have worked hard to resolve an issue that I'm struggling to see as an immediate problem anyway.
Destroying a healthy and reasonably rare animal seems daft to me. Sure, transport is stressful (and they never worry about that when bringing in new animals
), but it doesn't sound like they have worked hard to resolve an issue that I'm struggling to see as an immediate problem anyway.
#8
Well Marius got done for this morning, and the article gave a fairly good explanation why. He wasn't prime breeding stock and it costs money to keep animals in the zoo. The wildlife park in Holland and the zoo in Yorkshire who made last minute bids to accept him should consider why they waited until the last minute instead of blaming Copenhagen. Noah only had room for two.
#9
BE Forum Addict








Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,124











at least the big cats will be well fed
and why did UK zoo wait so long to make an offer .. it seems more like a last minute plea
and why did UK zoo wait so long to make an offer .. it seems more like a last minute plea
#10
Hey kids, let's go to the zoo today and watch the nice people there chop up a dead giraffe and feed it to the tigers...yay... fun times. Ice cream anyone?
#11
Destroying a healthy and reasonably rare animal seems daft to me. Sure, transport is stressful (and they never worry about that when bringing in new animals
), but it doesn't sound like they have worked hard to resolve an issue that I'm struggling to see as an immediate problem anyway.
#12
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0











As a species overall at the moment no they are not, they are listed as least concern IUCN, however there are 2 sub-species that are endangered.
Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. peralta (common names of Niger Giraffe, Nigerien Giraffe, West African Giraffe) which has an estimated population of 200-250 individuals.
The other sub-species is Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. rothschildi ( Rothschild’s Giraffe, Ugandan Giraffe) with an estimated population of of less then 670 individuals and declining.
Total population as a species including the above, estimates are around 80,000+ individuals. (depending on source.)
Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. peralta (common names of Niger Giraffe, Nigerien Giraffe, West African Giraffe) which has an estimated population of 200-250 individuals.
The other sub-species is Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. rothschildi ( Rothschild’s Giraffe, Ugandan Giraffe) with an estimated population of of less then 670 individuals and declining.
Total population as a species including the above, estimates are around 80,000+ individuals. (depending on source.)
#14
As a species overall at the moment no they are not, they are listed as least concern IUCN, however there are 2 sub-species that are endangered.
Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. peralta (common names of Niger Giraffe, Nigerien Giraffe, West African Giraffe) which has an estimated population of 200-250 individuals.
The other sub-species is Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. rothschildi ( Rothschild’s Giraffe, Ugandan Giraffe) with an estimated population of of less then 670 individuals and declining.
Total population as a species including the above, estimates are around 80,000+ individuals. (depending on source.)
Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. peralta (common names of Niger Giraffe, Nigerien Giraffe, West African Giraffe) which has an estimated population of 200-250 individuals.
The other sub-species is Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. rothschildi ( Rothschild’s Giraffe, Ugandan Giraffe) with an estimated population of of less then 670 individuals and declining.
Total population as a species including the above, estimates are around 80,000+ individuals. (depending on source.)
#15
The linked article said they reproduce well in captivity, which must have influenced the decision to kill him. Even so, it seems like a waste. More ammunition for those who would like to eliminate zoos as well. Thinking about the times I've been to zoos or seen exotic animals at the circus I have to wonder what it's worth. I'm undecided.


