![]() |
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
I enjoy listening to what Galloway has to say. At least he's not a war criminal who led his country into an illegal genocidal invasion of another sovereign nation on pretence of excuses that have been proved to be total lies.
|
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
Originally Posted by Cyan
(Post 8895494)
I enjoy listening to what Galloway has to say. At least he's not a war criminal who led his country into an illegal genocidal invasion of another sovereign nation on pretence of excuses that have been proved to be total lies.
|
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
Scotch is a drink, not a nationality:frown:
|
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 8894996)
Still, a nice smear campaign was all that was required to defuse the harm he could do (if you remember, his anti war stance was the majority opinion in the UK). No need to fabricate court level evidence, just enough to castrate him as a political force (which was the actual end result).
You think this wouldn't happen? The authorities would never stoop to this? Well, Saddam might not have been a saint, but you forget that the government completely invented the evidence about WMD's and Saddams ability to deploy them in 45 minutes (well, if you are going to lie, lie big). And also, please stop conflating my defence of Galloway from lies with support for either him, his opinions, or Saddam (which you seemed to imply for some reason). He's a publicity seeking attention whore and Saddam was a brutal, albeit WMD'less, dictator. No Iraqi missile had a range long enough to reach closer than the SE tip of Cyprus. I believe it was all an excuse to secure oil supplies and to stop Israel from starting a war in the Middle East, which is what I believe would have happened if they'd bombed any Arab country. I don't support Galloway, but I agree with some of his opinions, and I defend his right to free speech. |
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8894727)
No one should be banned for speakign their mind, freedom of speech is at its most important when people are saying things you don't like or don't want to hear, and the pretense that hes raising money for terrorist organizations is desirable.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/manitoba/st...o-protest.html
Originally Posted by Cyan
(Post 8895494)
I enjoy listening to what Galloway has to say. At least he's not a war criminal who led his country into an illegal genocidal invasion of another sovereign nation on pretense of excuses that have been proved to be total lies.
|
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 8895977)
A precedent was sent for anyone coming in to Canada to start crap.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/manitoba/st...o-protest.html |
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8895981)
Hardly comparable, the God Hates Fags people intended to enter Canada specifically to commit a crime.
|
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 8895993)
What was their crime? If you say hate speech, then Galloway spreads hate too.
Didn't the Supreme Court state that Canada has to repatriate Mr. Kadr. I have heard of Mr. Galloway advocating the murder of his fellow citizens? |
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 8895993)
What was their crime? If you say hate speech, then Galloway spreads hate too.
|
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8896011)
I do say hate speech and differentiate in that Phelps and crew target specific members of the public whereas, while Galloway's position may clash with that of the government of the day, it is a political one not vastly different from that of the government in Canada at the time of all that nonsense about WMDs. Galloway is not attacking any individual and especially not doing so in a way that clashes with that person's Charter rights. Harper and Kenney don't like him attacking their opinions, they're delicate, I feel for them, but he's not a physical threat to them and they don't need a ban.
|
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8896007)
Didn't the Supreme Court state that Canada has to repatriate Mr. Kadr.
|
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8896097)
I agree that Galloway shouldn't be banned, its a nonsense that he was. However, would you say the same about Geert Wilders being banned from entering the UK a few years ago? I see his court case started today.
|
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8896097)
I agree that Galloway shouldn't be banned, its a nonsense that he was. However, would you say the same about Geert Wilders being banned from entering the UK a few years ago? I see his court case started today.
|
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8896007)
So do some Jews, Christians, Muslims and Palestinians, are they all to be banned as well?
Didn't the Supreme Court state that Canada has to repatriate Mr. Kadr. I have heard of Mr. Galloway advocating the murder of his fellow citizens?
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8896011)
I do say hate speech and differentiate in that Phelps and crew target specific members of the public whereas, while Galloway's position may clash with that of the government of the day, it is a political one not vastly different from that of the government in Canada at the time of all that nonsense about WMDs. Galloway is not attacking any individual and especially not doing so in a way that clashes with that person's Charter rights. Harper and Kenney don't like him attacking their opinions, they're delicate, I feel for them, but he's not a physical threat to them and they don't need a ban.
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8896097)
I agree that Galloway shouldn't be banned, its a nonsense that he was. However, would you say the same about Geert Wilders being banned from entering the UK a few years ago? I see his court case started today.
|
Re: George Galloway - Twat or not?
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 8896174)
I'll say again. Galloway has no rights to anything in this country.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:43 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.