![]() |
Re: Fly BMI?
Originally Posted by shadowplay
(Post 4878926)
I always presumed BMI was expensive as everytime I tried to look up routes, you need a mortgage just for the taxes and fees. Seriously though I am surprised that nobody has mentioned Canadian -affair based in London. I have travelled on their direct routes for a few years and had no real problems. It's charter but hey you get what you pay for. Not sure if they still provide Heathrow to Halifax though and usually only in service May - Oct.
|
Re: Fly BMI?
Originally Posted by Ben W Bell
(Post 4878757)
Air Canada currently has two 777s in it's inventory, both of which now operate on the Heathrow - Toronto route. They seem to be operating on a 2:1:0 pattern (where 2 fly one day, 1 the next and 0 the next) due to the vagaries of transatlantic flying, timezones and airport opening hours. If you look at the Air Canada site for booking this route you will see then come up on some flights.
The new 777-300s are niiiiiiice...... |
Re: Fly BMI?
Canadian affair fly out of Heathrow to Toronto now. They are now also owned by that lovely airline called Air Transat
|
Re: Fly BMI?
Originally Posted by deanjp32
(Post 4886581)
Canadian affair fly out of Heathrow to Toronto now. They are now also owned by that lovely airline called Air Transat
|
Re: Fly BMI?
Originally Posted by deanjp32
(Post 4886581)
Canadian affair fly out of Heathrow to Toronto now. They are now also owned by that lovely airline called Air Transat
|
Re: Fly BMI?
i remember i went to cuba (varadero) on my honeymoon a couple of years ago,and there was an air transat plan with the whole tail fin section missing.
the airport staff said there had been a problem with the rudder whilst flying and they hadnt got round to fixing it......the plane had been there for 7 months and looked in a sorry state.....wouldnt surprise me if it was still there:blink: |
Re: Fly BMI?
Originally Posted by Maiden_uk82
(Post 4898074)
Air Transat.......... why is that name sending off alarm bells in my head :confused: Too much discovery channel :unsure:
|
Re: Fly BMI?
That 1 did land safely in the azores or whatever it is called with just a few burst tyres i believe and it was 1 of the newer airbus's. I flew back from Montreal with them on 9th Sept 2001 on 1 of the L1011's. What a mess and the plane was delayed by 3 hours due to a crew change in Toronto the lying sods said. Found out later it was a technical fault which really pleased me no end knowing what had happened to the other plane. The worst was i was sat on the plane just about to take off when the pilot said it was a technical fault that had delayed the plane. If i ever see the girl at the gate again that told me about the crew change!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Re: Fly BMI?
L1011... thats a dam old bird isnt it? :eek: I swear they had a tail fin problem that crashed on another route, I could be wrong though, I really shouldnt watch those black box programmes :( That one that run out of fuel was amazing though, glided it safely thank god :thumbup: I seem to be getting worse as i get older when i comes to flying
|
Re: Fly BMI?
Originally Posted by Maiden_uk82
(Post 4901884)
L1011... thats a dam old bird isnt it? :eek: I swear they had a tail fin problem that crashed on another route, I could be wrong though, I really shouldnt watch those black box programmes :( That one that run out of fuel was amazing though, glided it safely thank god :thumbup: I seem to be getting worse as i get older when i comes to flying
Air Transat tried to play down the incident but this was real serious one. Much more serious than loosing engine power, even. I think A300/310s were close to being grounded worldwide. The American airlines A300 (similar aircraft) lost it's WHOLE rudder if you remember, in 2001. That resulted in it crashing in Queens. I think their L1101 Tristars have been retired now... |
Re: Fly BMI?
I thought airbus were pretty safe, i know with tail fins dc10/md88 have had some issues, esp. md88, 1 bolt holds the top section together which if it goes it renders the plane useless, something wich is against the regulations, FAA?, so i dont know if thats been fixed yet
|
Re: Fly BMI?
Originally Posted by Maiden_uk82
(Post 4913793)
I thought airbus were pretty safe, i know with tail fins dc10/md88 have had some issues, esp. md88, 1 bolt holds the top section together which if it goes it renders the plane useless, something wich is against the regulations, FAA?, so i dont know if thats been fixed yet
The airbus A300/310 problem is more serious because the carbon composite material tends hide damage and to disintegrate all of a sudden. Airbus now requires more frequent ultrasonic checks on all A300/310 tails. In 95% of cases its not so much the plane design or age, but the people who maintain it. |
Re: Fly BMI?
Originally Posted by neill
(Post 4943384)
In 95% of cases its not so much the plane design or age, but the people who maintain it.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 4:54 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.