British Expats - Films with no sequels that really should...

Page 2 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)

- The Maple Leaf (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/)

- - Films with no sequels that really should... (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/films-no-sequels-really-should-843388/)

happyhammers

Sep 19th 2014 3:33 am

Re: Films with no sequels that really should...

Quote:

Originally Posted by geedee (Post 11411141)

Brilliant film but wasn't the ending fairly wrapped up?

Nearly , the monster comes out of the back of Kurt Russell's truck when he is driving at the end of the film, but I think its open for another, its got cult status now.

Its all in the reflexes Chang !

sharkus

Sep 19th 2014 10:41 am

Re: Films with no sequels that really should...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atlantic Xpat (Post 11409554)

Layer Cake: Daniel Craig survives being shot and decides not to get out of the drugs/crime business but take over from Michael Gambon.

He does survive ;)
It is based on a book, and there is a follow up called Viva La Madness. I would highly recommend reading both if you enjoyed the film.

Bleepedy Bloops

Sep 20th 2014 1:22 pm

Re: Films with no sequels that really should...

Drive

Hawk13

Sep 22nd 2014 10:38 am

Re: Films with no sequels that really should...

The Thing (1982 version)

Scientists in the Antarctic are confronted by a shape-shifting alien that assumes the appearance of the people that it kills.

Great movie.

sharkus

Sep 22nd 2014 10:45 am

Re: Films with no sequels that really should...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hawk13 (Post 11414666)

The Thing (1982 version)

Scientists in the Antarctic are confronted by a shape-shifting alien that assumes the appearance of the people that it kills.

Great movie.

There is a prequel to it.

All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:11 am.

Page 2 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page