![]() |
Re: Existentialism at its worst
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 7962337)
Its a bit early even for you, I'd imagine. ;)
|
Re: Existentialism at its worst
does the worst of existantialism overlap with the best of nihilism?
|
Re: Existentialism at its worst
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 7964964)
does the worst of existantialism overlap with the best of nihilism?
|
Re: Existentialism at its worst
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 7964964)
does the worst of existantialism overlap with the best of nihilism?
|
Re: Existentialism at its worst
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 7965077)
Dunno, lets have a big pointless fight with samarui swords. That should relieve the monotony of our meaningless insignificant existence.
|
Re: Existentialism at its worst
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 7965096)
Each to his own and all that, but I think that contravenes Rule 2. :sneaky:
|
Re: Existentialism at its worst
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 7965108)
What was rule 2 again? "No meaningless acts of self destruction shall be used by posters to ease the ennui their futile lives". No, it's something about racism and porn, so it doesn't
2. There may be places where sexually explicit, racist, obscene or vulgar language, graphics or behavior is appropriate however BritishExpats.com is NOT one of them. We do not alllow graphics that contain nude body parts, sexually-orientated or violent acts. Should anyone use inappropriate language, start a personal attack, or engage in hate speech, they will be barred from all further discussions. |
Re: Existentialism at its worst
Originally Posted by Butch Cassidy
(Post 7965235)
No seriously it does
2. There may be places where sexually explicit, racist, obscene or vulgar language, graphics or behavior is appropriate however BritishExpats.com is NOT one of them. We do not alllow graphics that contain nude body parts, sexually-orientated or violent acts. Should anyone use inappropriate language, start a personal attack, or engage in hate speech, they will be barred from all further discussions. - I don't see no graphics in my post. - Being nihilistic, it was an impersonal attack (well more of a request really) |
Re: Existentialism at its worst
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 7965342)
2 points
- I don't see no graphics in my post. - Being nihilistic, it was an impersonal attack (well more of a request really) -I didnt underline the word graphic -striking someone with a samurai sword could be deemed as extremely personal |
Re: Existentialism at its worst
Originally Posted by Butch Cassidy
(Post 7965347)
2 points
-I didnt underline the word graphic -striking someone with a samurai sword could be deemed as extremely personal - You highlighted "violent acts". That phrase was used in a sentence about graphics depicting them. - If you are a nihilist you'd be doing it just to pass some time before you died. It can't be a personal attack as the very word 'attack' implicitly recognizes the validity of a moral framework. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:31 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.