EU Referendum vote.
#16
Re: EU Referendum vote.
I just hope the 'Out' campaign will be honest in what leaving the EU will actually mean. The constant refrain from UKIP is that we need to leave the EU in order to control our own borders and not be subject to the jurisdiction of a 'foreign' court, neither of which is true, as we would also need to leave the EEA and the Council of Europe for that to happen.
I think the referendum process will also shed some light on what Europe intends to become. There is no point presenting the public with a technical referendum, the choice is essentially, increased integration (In) or greater autonomy (Out).
#17
Re: EU Referendum vote.
At this stage the EU clearly needs some sort of reform, there's too much of a gap between the industrial north and the sun soaked south (there, I said it politely).
The UK seems to be in quite a weird position because of the disproportionate influence of London as the financial capital of the world. No other European nation- hell not many nations at all- have this sort of juggernaught in one corner of the country that creates an economy that's inhospitable to manufacturing and other secondary industries. The closest I've experienced is Nigeria where the oil industry- and the artificially high currency it leads too- has destroyed agriculture and prevented any serious industrialisation, it's all too high cost.
So the "OUT" vote might hurt the city- but it will certainly hurt industry, eg all of those car plants across the midlands/ north.
Yet the real fear is that an out vote will just a vote against the polish plumber.
The UK seems to be in quite a weird position because of the disproportionate influence of London as the financial capital of the world. No other European nation- hell not many nations at all- have this sort of juggernaught in one corner of the country that creates an economy that's inhospitable to manufacturing and other secondary industries. The closest I've experienced is Nigeria where the oil industry- and the artificially high currency it leads too- has destroyed agriculture and prevented any serious industrialisation, it's all too high cost.
So the "OUT" vote might hurt the city- but it will certainly hurt industry, eg all of those car plants across the midlands/ north.
Yet the real fear is that an out vote will just a vote against the polish plumber.
#20
Re: EU Referendum vote.
Cultural terms, more specifically social terms, I don't think there are many but retired colonels and extreme right wingers that don't appreciate some of the European reforms.
Historic, it's more a case of avoiding war than guarding faded British glories.
#21
Re: EU Referendum vote.
The question of how much the EU costs, or indeed whether it costs anything at all, is complicated. The antis tend to just point to how much we pay in directly, and that we get less back. But that ignores the trade benefits of being in, and that a lot of companies are in the UK precisely because it gives them access to EU markets. It would only need a few of them to relocate and the financial loss of leaving would far outweigh the gains.
#22
Re: EU Referendum vote.
I suppose the same headings could be used, but different arguments. In economic terms the best the No (sceptic) can say is that the UK won't suffer economically. There is the financial levy issue and future of the City, that will give the No some ammunition, and that will be something worth considering once some numbers and analyses are out. On balance though, the UK ought to be economically stronger within than without IMO.
Cultural terms, more specifically social terms, I don't think there are many but retired colonels and extreme right wingers that don't appreciate some of the European reforms.
Historic, it's more a case of avoiding war than guarding faded British glories.
Cultural terms, more specifically social terms, I don't think there are many but retired colonels and extreme right wingers that don't appreciate some of the European reforms.
Historic, it's more a case of avoiding war than guarding faded British glories.
One of the retired colonels...
EU referendum: Kate Hoey gets backing to head no campaign | Politics | The Guardian
"European reforms" - such as?
What point are you making with the last line? The EU prevents wars?
#23
Re: EU Referendum vote.
I think the Out campaign will be more balanced than the UKIP hysteria of late. John Redwood was speaking on it the other day, he along with other Eurosceptics ought to be heard, at least.
I think the referendum process will also shed some light on what Europe intends to become. There is no point presenting the public with a technical referendum, the choice is essentially, increased integration (In) or greater autonomy (Out).
I think the referendum process will also shed some light on what Europe intends to become. There is no point presenting the public with a technical referendum, the choice is essentially, increased integration (In) or greater autonomy (Out).
Leaving the EEA would give the UK autonomy to decide how to best complete its suicide.
Last edited by Novocastrian; Jun 11th 2015 at 9:15 pm.
#25
Re: EU Referendum vote.
(Out), in fact, yields less autonomy, unless the UK also leaves the EEA, since EU Regulations would still have to be adhered to and the UK would have no voice in their formulation.
Leaving the EEA would give the UK autonomy to decide how to best complete its suicide.
Leaving the EEA would give the UK autonomy to decide how to best complete its suicide.
We know which way you're voting!
#26
Re: EU Referendum vote.
I think the no supporter would strongly disagree with the statement in bold. They would make the case that the EU is dragging the UK down. Whether that's true or not I don't know..
One of the retired colonels...
EU referendum: Kate Hoey gets backing to head no campaign | Politics | The Guardian
"European reforms" - such as?
What point are you making with the last line? The EU prevents wars?
One of the retired colonels...
EU referendum: Kate Hoey gets backing to head no campaign | Politics | The Guardian
"European reforms" - such as?
What point are you making with the last line? The EU prevents wars?
The EU aims to prevent wars amongst it's members. (That was a key motivation of the EEC.) Successful to date.
#27
Re: EU Referendum vote.
The sceptics may disagree on the bolded statement, but the reality is 'bird in the hand vs bird in the bush'. Not unlike Scotland's case with Salmond promising untold prosperity (week's before the oil price crash).
The EU aims to prevent wars amongst it's members. (That was a key motivation of the EEC.) Successful to date.
The EU aims to prevent wars amongst it's members. (That was a key motivation of the EEC.) Successful to date.
- Winston Churchill, September 1946
#28
Part Time Poster
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 4,219
Re: EU Referendum vote.
Well the first thing that will change, will be our national credit rating, and its unlikely to be positive
So all those bitching about taxes to the EU, will instead pay much more in there mortgage to the banks
And so will Multinationals with UK based operations, so I'd expect the 'work' to move east...
The polish make have followed the work here, but if you make them leave a good portion of the work will follow them
So all those bitching about taxes to the EU, will instead pay much more in there mortgage to the banks
And so will Multinationals with UK based operations, so I'd expect the 'work' to move east...
The polish make have followed the work here, but if you make them leave a good portion of the work will follow them
#29
Re: EU Referendum vote.
"We must build a kind of United States of Europe. In this way only will hundreds of millions of toilers be able to regain the simple joys and hopes which make life worth living. The process is simple. All that is needed is the resolve of hundreds of millions of men and women to do right instead of wrong and to gain as their reward blessing instead of cursing."
- Winston Churchill, September 1946
- Winston Churchill, September 1946