![]() |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by Thorstien
(Post 6161420)
It just makes me wonder why natural selection would create them?
Heterosexual women trapped by the confines of matrimony then turn to their passionless, sexually docile husbands as that is their only choice to get their rocks off and babies appear, repeat. |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by hot wasabi peas
(Post 6161481)
Gay men exist to create gay porn which is sexually arousing to heterosexual women. Most will deny that because it seems unfeminine to get wet watching two, or more, blokes go at it.
Heterosexual women trapped by the confines of matrimony then turn to their passionless, sexually docile husbands as that is their only choice to get their rocks off and babies appear, repeat. See - it's easy when you know the answer ..... |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by hot wasabi peas
(Post 6161481)
Gay men exist to create gay porn which is sexually arousing to heterosexual women. Most will deny that because it seems unfeminine to get wet watching two, or more, blokes go at it.
Heterosexual women trapped by the confines of matrimony then turn to their passionless, sexually docile husbands as that is their only choice to get their rocks off and babies appear, repeat. Not sure about natural selection but it's not just gay people who can get their rocks off with same sex experiences as HWP happily points out. Sex is about pleasure, emotions, not just babies. Hell, women don't even need go near a d*ck to get pregnant if they don't want to. Pick some hunky dna from a catalogue and you're away. |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
g'nite and good bye. I'm outta here.
|
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by windward
(Post 6161540)
.lol. 'Married and bored, or single and lonely'.
Not sure about natural selection but it's not just gay people who can get their rocks off with same sex experiences as HWP happily points out. Sex is about pleasure, emotions, not just babies. Hell, women don't even need go near a d*ck to get pregnant if they don't want to. Pick some hunky dna from a catalogue and you're away. |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by bazzz
(Post 6160865)
Huh. A gay friend of mine has made some very unwise decisions when confronted with a rippling torso and a massive cock. (Not mine).
|
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by Thorstien
(Post 6161549)
g'nite and good bye. I'm outta here.
Originally Posted by hot wasabi peas
(Post 6161562)
Oh hell... all women need is a healthy volunteer, a bowl and a turkey baster. I could go on about the natual selection of kitchen utensils but I'm really not very domesticated.
Turkey basters are all very well, but wouldn't a throbbing BE member be preferable? Thorstien (and of course myself) being excepted. |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by hot wasabi peas
(Post 6161391)
"And I'm wearing milkbone underwear"
|
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by hot wasabi peas
(Post 6161562)
Oh hell... all women need is a healthy volunteer, a bowl and a turkey baster. I could go on about the natual selection of kitchen utensils but I'm really not very domesticated.
I'm reliably informed that the syringe thing in Children's Tylenol cartons is better at <ahem> hitting the mark. Trouble is you can only measure 5ml at a time. I am not saying another word. :eek: |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by windward
(Post 6161540)
.lol. 'Married and bored, or single and lonely'.
Not sure about natural selection but it's not just gay people who can get their rocks off with same sex experiences as HWP happily points out. Sex is about pleasure, emotions, not just babies. Hell, women don't even need go near a d*ck to get pregnant if they don't want to. Pick some hunky dna from a catalogue and you're away. |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by dingbat
(Post 6161619)
Bet it was a priest....:blink:
Later. |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by Thorstien
(Post 6161549)
g'nite and good bye. I'm outta here.
|
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by Thorstien
(Post 6161622)
I was wrong again. every time I think of shutting the pc down some new comment comes up.
|
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by Thorstien
(Post 6161599)
the primary function of sex is to procreate
Why do bonobos masturbate? Why do bison have anal sex? Why are some dophins gay? etc... |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Is it ok that abusive and violent people have sex to make babies?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:09 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.