|
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by Thorstien
(Post 6160816)
Why don't you people reply with an argumentive debate in stead of childish insults. I am entiled to my views and opinions just as you are. I never said that I don't care about or hate homosexuals. they should be treated like any other mentally ill patient. I have no problem with two queers bangin' each other. I also have no problem with you slitting your wrists. All I'm saying is that both actions are NOT NATURAL.
And natural in one mans eyes is not natural in anothers - you have just got to accept that. Smae with paedophiles, I would readily hang draw and quater every last one of them, but in their own eyes they are doing what they feel they need to. Now in your last post about voting for one - Paedophilia is ILLEGAL - homosexuality is not, alcohol impares your reasonable judgement - homosexuality does not, depression is a confirmed mental illness, and guess what........................ |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by Thorstien
(Post 6160816)
Why don't you people reply with an argumentive debate in stead of childish insults. I am entiled to my views and opinions just as you are. I never said that I don't care about or hate homosexuals. they should be treated like any other mentally ill patient. I have no problem with two queers bangin' each other. I also have no problem with you slitting your wrists. All I'm saying is that both actions are NOT NATURAL.
|
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by mandymoochops
(Post 6160856)
alcohol impares your reasonable judgement - homosexuality does not,
|
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
PMSL:lol::lol::lol::lol::D
Classic! |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by bazzz
(Post 6160865)
Huh. A gay friend of mine has made some very unwise decisions when confronted with a rippling torso and a massive cock. (Not mine).
Haven't we all |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by mandymoochops
(Post 6160874)
Haven't we all
|
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by Lorna_D
(Post 6160884)
:ohmy: surely that's for another forum :rofl:
|
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by Lorna_D
(Post 6160884)
:ohmy: surely that's for another forum :rofl:
|
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Anyhow, to keep in topic, keep the politician. those comments are fifteen years old. surely his views have changed a little since then. Also people should really stop applying their throw away the bad MP routine. every time some MP makes a mistake you get rid of them. Why vote at all if you can't have faith in the guy you voted for? let the MP fix his error before you get rid of him\her. Every human makes an error, it only becomes a mistake if you refuse to fix it. There are politicatins that have wasted billions of dollars, destroyed huge enviromental resources, closed hundreds of schools, yet they are still in office. Yet you are going to fire this one because of comments made fifteen years ago that were not so unpopular back then? "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me." You should get real.
|
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by Thorstien
(Post 6160906)
Anyhow, to keep in topic, keep the politician. those comments are fifteen years old. surely his views have changed a little since then. Also people should really stop applying their throw away the bad MP routine. every time some MP makes a mistake you get rid of them. Why vote at all if you can't have faith in the guy you voted for? let the MP fix his error before you get rid of him\her. Every human makes an error, it only becomes a mistake if you refuse to fix it. There are politicatins that have wasted billions of dollars, destroyed huge enviromental resources, closed hundreds of schools, yet they are still in office. Yet you are going to fire this one because of comments made fifteen years ago that were not so unpopular back then? "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me." You should get real.
|
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by mandymoochops
(Post 6160856)
How can you have an arguementative debate (those two words say it all really - inciting something perchance) when you know full well that everyone on here will disagree with you? If you had many differing views and opinions then yes you can have a debate. If you have one that is going to whip up the hornets nest what do you expect?
And natural in one mans eyes is not natural in anothers - you have just got to accept that. Smae with paedophiles, I would readily hang draw and quater every last one of them, but in their own eyes they are doing what they feel they need to. Now in your last post about voting for one - Paedophilia is ILLEGAL - homosexuality is not, alcohol impares your reasonable judgement - homosexuality does not, depression is a confirmed mental illness, and guess what........................ |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
There is no law that has more power than the laws of nature. If you try and break one you usually end up dead. Mans law only exisits to serve popular culture. They can be made and unmade to suit the mood of the people. etc... homosexulaty is legal in canada, the states, europe, but try and tour afganistan or iraq where homosexuality is punishible by death. mans law in effect. Natural law... man has sex with man, no offspring, the bloodline dies. man has sex with woman she gets pregnant and produces offspring to continue the bloodline. Mans law will always change. the laws of mother nature are the same as they were a billion years ago. You cannot judge what is natural by mans law, as the definition will change with time.
|
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by Thorstien
(Post 6160970)
There is no law that has more power than the laws of nature. If you try and break one you usually end up dead. Mans law only exisits to serve popular culture. They can be made and unmade to suit the mood of the people. etc... homosexulaty is legal in canada, the states, europe, but try and tour afganistan or iraq where homosexuality is punishible by death. mans law in effect. Natural law... man has sex with man, no offspring, the bloodline dies. man has sex with woman she gets pregnant and produces offspring to continue the bloodline. Mans law will always change. the laws of mother nature are the same as they were a billion years ago. You cannot judge what is natural by mans law, as the definition will change with time.
Anyway, so much for your laws: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7330196.stm |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by bazzz
(Post 6160989)
What, so sex is only good for breeding? Does having a vasectomy make me mentally ill?
Anyway, so much for your laws: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7330196.stm |
Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
Originally Posted by Thorstien
(Post 6160970)
There is no law that has more power than the laws of nature. If you try and break one you usually end up dead. Mans law only exisits to serve popular culture. They can be made and unmade to suit the mood of the people. etc... homosexulaty is legal in canada, the states, europe, but try and tour afganistan or iraq where homosexuality is punishible by death. mans law in effect. Natural law... man has sex with man, no offspring, the bloodline dies. man has sex with woman she gets pregnant and produces offspring to continue the bloodline. Mans law will always change. the laws of mother nature are the same as they were a billion years ago. You cannot judge what is natural by mans law, as the definition will change with time.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:53 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.