Re: Coronavirus
 

Very slippery slope and I cannot see it surviving a legal challenge.

Re: Coronavirus
 

Oh that's so wrong for many reasons. It smacks of insurance that won't cover pre existing conditions, or paying more if you have a genetic predisposition to certain illnesses. What about charging more for those who do dangerous sports, or ski, or ride horses, or smoke, or drink? No, it's completely against the notion of equal access to health care.

Re: Coronavirus
 

Indeed. Smacks, smacks, smacks! Stupidity is a rather preexisting condition.

P.S. They do charge extra taxes for smoking and drinking.

Re: Coronavirus
 

In that case I prescribe Jesus Christ Superstar :lol:

Re: Coronavirus
 

A distinction can be drawn on infectious disease. I believe Singapore is doing something similar.

Re: Coronavirus
 

. On a purchase, there's no healthcare supplement/ penalty.

Healthcare and making moral judgments should be incompatible.

Re: Coronavirus
 

It's not so much a moral judgement as an economic one. Were healthcare systems to have unlimited resources (including staff) it would not be an issue.

Re: Coronavirus
 

Lol... yeah it would do that. last time I listened to it we were around a camp fire in the middle of a forest.... of course a few drinks were involved.... that was quite a a heeby jeeby expreience - perfect!

Re: Coronavirus
 

I suspect this tax is a knee-jerk reaction by the QC government to force people to get vaccinated. Asking nicely isn't working. Bringing back the curfew on New Year's Eve was another such reaction.

I would not be surprised if Arruda has been made a fall guy for the recent string of cock ups. He's been doing a good job for the last two years, is highly respected and very popular in QC. Very much a poster boy. He wasn't calling the shots though. Things have gone awry and someone has to take the blame. It's also possible that he's had enough.

Re: Coronavirus
 

This is different though....I am going to offer another perspective. I don't necessarily think a tax is the right approach, but something needs to be done.

Smoking or drinking health related issues don't cause hospital capacity issues, it doesn't ruin people business's and take their jobs through having to lockdown.... we are all paying the price for people choosing not to be vaccinated. 50% of all hospitalisations with covid now are unvaccinated people,.... why should a cancer patient miss out on life saving surgery because someone made the choice not to be vaccinated. They call it pro choice... I have no problem with that....but if they get sick, then that was their choice, A cancer sufferer doesn't get to make that choice... (except maybe a heavy smoker but thats only a fraction of cases), life saving surgeries are being cancelled and people are dying, thats not fair is it? you see what I mean?

The vaccine obviously works... so let it do its job in keeping people out of hospitals

Re: Coronavirus
 

Well yes, something should be done to protect the innocent from the unvaccinated. Maybe send them to Australia?

Re: Coronavirus
 

A couple of weeks ago the QC government introduced a requirement for vax passports to be shown at the govt-run booze and pot stores. The number of people booking first appointments shot up instantly.

Re: Coronavirus
 

Facts beg to differ. Higher taxes on cigarettes and alcohol are there because of negative impacts on health. So says the government. These taxes are jacked up using Health Canada recommendations.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/cig...pott-1.4410518

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/new-...dget-1.5393362

I think the case of cigarette taxes helping public healthcare isn’t as strong though. In the case of Covid vaccination we have a public health emergency, the system isn’t coping, so the logic is more obvious and sound.

Re: Coronavirus
 

Doubt they’ll get it enforced in QC. But in the meantime the thought of an extra tax will probably have enough impact to push over the line the “I’m not an antivaxer, just hesitant” people.

Re: Coronavirus
 

How you explain the number of vaccinated in hospital then? In Alberta, the split is almost 2/3 1/3 of vaccinated/unvaccinated in hospital and 82%/18% of new cases between vaccinated and unvaccinated (and, yes, I fully understand the argument that the numbers are skewed by the percentages of the population that are vaccinated/unvaccinated). See here: COVID-19 Alberta statistics | alberta.ca

However, if we are looking at where the burden falls that is placing the healthcare system under stress, it is not upon the unvaccinated.

You will have to explain to me how, if I have understood Quebec's proposal correctly, that taxing all unvaccinated is correct? For example, why should an unvaccinated person, that has not caught C-19, nor has had to use the medical system for anything related to C-19, have to pay a punishment tax?

If jurisdictions wish to make vaccination compulsory, enact that and be prepared to fight the likely legal battles that will come.