![]() |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Gozit
(Post 12876059)
"easier" doesn't go together with how much of an actual risk it poses though.
Absolutely I would have no problem self isolating if I was mad enough to travel to or transit parts of US, UK, Brazil, etc. But to travel to my tiny Malta with 39 cases, 9 deaths, no community transmission? I should not have to self isolate on my return if not experiencing symptoms. Other countries are relaxing this rule and have the same level of COVID-19 as us, why aren't we doing the same? I think you are right Jsmth, it is just 'easier' for the government...which unfortunately isn't that great of an excuse. But there isn't much you can do. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12876062)
You could catch the virus on the plane or in the airport, so actually, self-isolation would still be prudent.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Gozit
(Post 12876068)
I could also catch it at the shopping mall (which are now open) and I don't self isolate when I come back from there.
Why do you go to shopping malls? |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Gozit
(Post 12876068)
I could also catch it at the shopping mall (which are now open) and I don't self isolate when I come back from there.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Gozit
(Post 12876068)
I could also catch it at the shopping mall (which are now open) and I don't self isolate when I come back from there.
In this part of Canada we've got off lightly. A large part of that - as with New Zealand - is the travel restrictions in place between the provinces. A quarter of our cases and the only two deaths in NB are linked with a single person visiting Quebec. The provinces here are just opening up to each other - not to Quebec though. NB, PEI and Newfoundland all have very low figures. NS population is only 200,000 more than NB but their figures are completely out of whack in comparison. The NS death total is almost half the total number of cases in NB. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12876079)
But there's the difference. There are things needed from shopping, just like you could be run over by a bus crossing the street if there's something needed on the other side. How vital is that trip?
To answer the question of why i'm going to the mall? Because it's open and i'm comfortable with the risk. Yes I did wear a mask while there. But the mall is full of people indoors and so is the airport. What is the increased risk vector? No one has answered that yet. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12876076)
The shopping mall is in Canada so that's irrelevant.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Gozit
(Post 12876086)
I can guarantee there is absolutely nothing necessary that you need from the mall. That is all purely indulgent shopping. Essentials can be picked up from groceries/pharmacies.
To answer the question of why i'm going to the mall? Because it's open and i'm comfortable with the risk. Yes I did wear a mask while there. But the mall is full of people indoors and so is the airport. What is the increased risk vector? No one has answered that yet. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Gozit
(Post 12876023)
I don't see any more of a risk taking a holiday to a country with lower COVID cases/rate of transmission then Canada. But if I were to go the government would have to pay a month of CERB since I wouldn't be able to work due to the mandatory quarantine. So there's that.
I don't like being at home for long periods though, so I won't be travelling until that requirement is lifted. It is a little upsetting though given that many places are opening to Canadians. The EU did say it expected countries to which it has opened borders to reciprocate for EU citizens. I was hoping they would announce 'safe countries' to travel to. Maybe after 31 August.
Originally Posted by Gozit
(Post 12876059)
"easier" doesn't go together with how much of an actual risk it poses though.
Absolutely I would have no problem self isolating if I was mad enough to travel to or transit parts of US, UK, Brazil, etc. But to travel to my tiny Malta with 39 cases, 9 deaths, no community transmission? I should not have to self isolate on my return if not experiencing symptoms. Other countries are relaxing this rule and have the same level of COVID-19 as us, why aren't we doing the same? I think you are right Jsmth, it is just 'easier' for the government...which unfortunately isn't that great of an excuse. But there isn't much you can do. Its a double edged sword, you would quite happily travel to countries with a lower rate of infection than you, but countries with a lower rate of infection than you- possibly don't want you because they have a lower rate of infection. NZ probably wants no one now (definitely don't want us Brits after the last pair that went over there!) in the same way you wouldn't want someone from those high infection rate countries coming round your neighbourhood without quarantine. Not to mention do you have faith in other countries reporting figures? todays rate of infection in Canada and the UK is remarkably similar (253 in 37million versus 519 in 68 million) yet the UK is handling the whole thing awfully - either the figures aren't right, the wild differences in strategy isn't that effective, or handling the virus has little to do with the actual figures. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Gozit
(Post 12876086)
I can guarantee there is absolutely nothing necessary that you need from the mall. That is all purely indulgent shopping. Essentials can be picked up from groceries/pharmaciest.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Gozit
(Post 12876086)
To answer the question of why i'm going to the mall? Because it's open and i'm comfortable with the risk. Yes I did wear a mask while there. But the mall is full of people indoors and so is the airport. What is the increased risk vector? No one has answered that yet. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Stumpylegs
(Post 12876095)
Not to mention do you have faith in other countries reporting figures? todays rate of infection in Canada and the UK is remarkably similar (253 in 37million versus 519 in 68 million) yet the UK is handling the whole thing awfully - either the figures aren't right, the wild differences in strategy isn't that effective, or handling the virus has little to do with the actual figures.
Canada 230 deaths per million UK 650 deaths per million |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12876092)
Increased risk vector? Imagine a confined metal tube containing several hundred fellow humans in close proximity all breathing the same air for several hours. Spot the difference.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12876099)
Don't you have grocery and pharmacy stores in the mall where you are? As well as essential stuff for communication/internet and clothing it's quite good to have them all close together to avoid multiple trips. ;)
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12876101)
It wasn't a disease related question but a general one. I haven't been into a shopping mall since the 1980s and so I wondered why other people go to one.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Gozit
(Post 12876106)
You can get on a plane and go across Canada and be in a metal tube for just as long as it takes to get to London and you still don't have to self isolate in all provinces. The arbitrary line in the sand is drawn at leaving the country and that is the frustrating part. If it were done purely on facts and science, you'd have to self isolate upon returning to Ontario from Quebec, but not from the Marshall Islands (no confirmed COVID but the country does have a COVID-19 response in place.)
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:58 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.