![]() |
Re: Coronavirus
Today the dentist called to confirm a routine appointment. I declined, thinking it far from safe. I wonder now if dentists require that patients have masks and just sort of poke around blindly.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Apparently a colleague was greeting people upon entry to the store and a guy came in with a couple of other people, one of whom coughed. The guy said "she's been doing that for hours and she's from Campbellton" - otherwise known as the Covid-19 capital of an otherwise almost free from active case province.
This was relayed to my SD some time later and she immediately said the colleague should tell the manager. I can't believe the greeter didn't report it straight away. The guy should have been asked to leave and maybe police called too. It's very likely a joke. But people have been charged for stuff like this and in other cases stores have closed for cleaning. What if it's not a joke? I'm tempted to report it via crimestoppers but if anything happened to have it investigated - store CCTV check, police interview etc - there could be confidentiality implications for my SD. This is where you need a union so a delegation could go to management. |
Re: Coronavirus
I couldn't do a shopping trip without at least one trip to the water closet.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-53064651 |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12867904)
It's very likely a joke. But people have been charged for stuff like this and in other cases stores have closed for cleaning. What if it's not a joke? . |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by MillieF
(Post 12868480)
We are ‘officially’ opening our main doors on Monday, and I am uncomfortable. There is only my colleague and me up there, and tape on the floor near the glass. Some of our clients are in bad situations and couldn’t self isolate if heaven commanded it. This second wave talk really bothers me...it’s a bit like NB and snow...not so much if but when. We’ve been lucky so far :fingerscrossed:
Do you have clients from out of zone 3? |
Re: Coronavirus
I'll wager that there will be no significant second wave.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12868501)
I'll wager that there will be no significant second wave.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12868504)
Have you been watching Mike Pence or something? I think it's too early for a prediction like that. The virus hasn't gone away, all that's changed is that we're going from serious lockdown to attempted avoidance.
BC has 19 new cases, 2 new outbreaks in healthcare facilities one being a small community hospital which is now limited to emergency care only. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...stem-1.5616648 Upside the health region we are moving to has only had 196 cases to date, so risk might be lower, Vancouver Health region is the 2nd most cases in BC. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12868504)
Have you been watching Mike Pence or something? I think it's too early for a prediction like that. The virus hasn't gone away, all that's changed is that we're going from serious lockdown to attempted avoidance.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12868532)
No. I have been studying the data rather than listening to the media. Whatever you set the wager at, I'll take the bet.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12868516)
I agree. The first wave hasn't even ended yet in many places, and seems when one outbreak is under control another pops up.
BC has 19 new cases, 2 new outbreaks in healthcare facilities one being a small community hospital which is now limited to emergency care only. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...stem-1.5616648 Upside the health region we are moving to has only had 196 cases to date, so risk might be lower, Vancouver Health region is the 2nd most cases in BC. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12868613)
Hardly a thing to bet on ! .
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12868613)
Hardly a thing to bet on ! The "media" in this case is qualified epidemiologists who also are studying the data, and their current conclusion seems to be that a second wave is likely.
This channel is worth a look at if you have some hours to spare: As I have indicated before, policy appears, to me, to be backwards. Those unlikely to be affected should all get infected as quickly as they can and those likely to be affected should do all they can to isolate from the rest. The media's obsession with number of infections is somewhat baffling to me. |
Re: Coronavirus
Total COVID-19 cases in Canada: 100,026 diagnoses, 8,254 deaths (as of June 18, 10:30 a.m. ET)]
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12868501)
I'll wager that there will be no significant second wave.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:11 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.