![]() |
Re: Canada & Kyoto
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 9790430)
So you don't want Canadians to log nor, I assume, to extract oil. I also assume ditto for salmon fishing and cattle farming. In light of the way that farmers use pesticides and other nasty things, I assume that arable farming is also out.
How are Canadians supposed to feed themselves and make money in your world? |
Re: Canada & Kyoto
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 9790442)
Personally the ones I am in business with use their brains to figure out how to add value to lumps of metal and ceramic and then sell them at a profit to other people who need them to keep airplanes in the air...
|
Re: Canada & Kyoto
Originally Posted by YoshiPal2010
(Post 9790809)
And, pray tell, what keeps these airplanes in the sky? Perhaps they are working on a big rubber band to launch them into the air! Besides, aren't jet planes supposed to be one of the biggest damagers of the climate?
The reality of the electricity fairy is that humans have been on earth, plodding away, for several million years. Consumer goods, electricity and internal combustion engines cant even claim several hundred years, a fraction of a blink of an eye in planetary terms. Humans dont need them, but we dont seem to be able to consider a world without them now either. The planet doesnt care, it will be here long after we are just part of the fossil record. |
Re: Canada & Kyoto
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 9790436)
If you, in your capacity as a thinking and concerned human being, are waiting for global political will to change that which you can see with your very own eyes, then you will be in fo a very long wait indeed.
Instead of bemoaning Canadian politicoes withdrawing from Kyoto, or wailing that Big Oil is destroying a forest that you can't get to, ask yourself... what are YOU as a person doing about it? Look around you... big detached house in a country that's either too hot or too cold? Vehicle with worse fuel economy than you would have in, say, the UK? How many flights have you been on this year? Perhaps politicians aren't hypocrites... maybe they really do represent the real disinterested attitudes of their constituents...? Guilty conscience? ;) |
Re: Canada & Kyoto
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 9790856)
Guilty conscience? ;)
I don't, on the one hand, complain about the nasty oil companies making dirty oil, and then, on the other hand, drive to Timmies in a Suburban on the way to the mall to buy the latest must-have, made in China, electronic shite. |
Re: Canada & Kyoto
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 9790880)
No, I'm just not a hypocrite.
I don't, on the one hand, complain about the nasty oil companies making dirty oil, and then, on the other hand, drive to Timmies in a Suburban on the way to the mall to buy the latest must-have, made in China, electronic shite. |
Re: Canada & Kyoto
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 9790885)
The problem with global warming is it'll no doubt make Canada more desirable for potential immigrants and that'll upset Dave.
In the future, the immigrants who want snow will have to go to places like Dubai, where they make it in the desert for fun, and which is ultimately paid for by people who drive to Timmies in a Suburban on the way to the mall to buy the latest, must-have, made in China, electronic shite. |
Re: Canada & Kyoto
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 9790430)
So you don't want Canadians to log nor, I assume, to extract oil. I also assume ditto for salmon fishing and cattle farming. In light of the way that farmers use pesticides and other nasty things, I assume that arable farming is also out.
How are Canadians supposed to feed themselves and make money in your world? There are two major forestry accreditation bodies in North America the FSC and SFI, the global standard that is being encouraged by industry is FSC which discourages clear cutting, and both are working to reduce it.. So logging can be done, I don’t think we should stop, I do think we should stop using outdated methods that are considerd bad for the environment, and for what it worth bad for forestry long term, but then as you know it’s no surprise to me that Canada is behind the times and in things like this often found to be closer to third world methods than first. For FSC certified products you need go no further than Home depot for wood, your envelopes from you bank, the packaging from Unilever, Nestle and more the world is moving forward, if Canada want to get left behind , it's not that the public wouldn’t buy it, But that share holder care, many companies want to ensure their stock can be traded on the ethical markets and get on the Dow Jones sustainability index, nobody wants a green peace protest on their door step like mattel got (see Asia Pacific Paper mattel) it's bad for business and stock value |
Re: Canada & Kyoto
I confess to not being a scientist and really am too ignorant to comment but I think George Carlin makes some valid points:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtrT5oG_IVc |
Re: Canada & Kyoto
Originally Posted by laser558
(Post 9791220)
I confess to not being a scientist and really am too ignorant to comment but I think George Carlin makes some valid points:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtrT5oG_IVc |
Re: Canada & Kyoto
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 9791554)
Namely?
|
Re: Canada & Kyoto
yes the earth is old, yes as lump of rock it will survive - it does not mean that we will enjoy the life available
however for those areas already suffering droughts & floods these are predicted to get more frequent & worse more cost (food increases in cost as crops fail), more disruption - floods, fires, droughts (which cripple manufacturing as water so critical) etc impacts from extreme events already impacting the UK economy & personally I would rather we worked to not increase them in the extremes more famine, more disease, more death - I suppose if that doesn't impact Canada, then that is may be why they are rejecting Kyoto it would be interesting to see what more frequent droughts could do to the prairies though - I would suppose someone has some info on that I see that Russia is joining Canada:frown: |
Re: Canada & Kyoto
Originally Posted by Bali2010
(Post 9792212)
yes the earth is old, yes as lump of rock it will survive - it does not mean that we will enjoy the life available
however for those areas already suffering droughts & floods these are predicted to get more frequent & worse more cost (food increases in cost as crops fail), more disruption - floods, fires, droughts (which cripple manufacturing as water so critical) etc impacts from extreme events already impacting the UK economy & personally I would rather we worked to not increase them in the extremes more famine, more disease, more death - I suppose if that doesn't impact Canada, then that is may be why they are rejecting Kyoto it would be interesting to see what more frequent droughts could do to the prairies though - I would suppose someone has some info on that I see that Russia is joining Canada:frown: |
Re: Canada & Kyoto
You are aware that hes a comedian, not an environmental scientist, right?:blink:
|
Re: Canada & Kyoto
Originally Posted by laser558
(Post 9792293)
What George Carlin has said and in many respects I agree, is that we humans are arrogant enough to think that we caused the global warming. We might have contributed a little but let's face it, it is something that has been going on for millions of years and will continue whether humans live on the earth or not. I am sorry but I cannot believe that humans have been responsible for what is going on in the world and politics should stop suggesting we are.
I am very sorry too & hope you can find some more informed material to help you understand that humans do very much have an impact for what is going on in the world & always have had - just sometimes we manage to correct it (clean air act, environmental legislation) |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:55 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.