![]() |
Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
More chance of a "Margaret Thatcher" primary school in Blyth I think.
http://www.calgaryherald.com/opinion...963/story.html |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
I believe the first comment (at least when I looked) at the bottom of the article may succinctly sum up local feeling on the subject:
"Rot in hell Pierre." :rofl: |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by bsmith
(Post 8394972)
I believe the first comment (at least when I looked) at the bottom of the article may succinctly sum up local feeling on the subject:
"Rot in hell Pierre." :rofl: So his efforts to establish two official languages and prevent Quebec from leaving are reasons to have his name on a school? Greeeeaaaat. Thanks for those Pierre. |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Iggorunt rednecks.
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8395100)
I liked this quote
So his efforts to establish two official languages and prevent Quebec from leaving are reasons to have his name on a school? Greeeeaaaat. Thanks for those Pierre. |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 8395122)
Iggorunt rednecks.
Go freeze in the dark. I remember the NEP.:sneaky: |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Canada needs more polarizing characters. Stick Trudeau's name up on the school.
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 8395489)
Pierre managed to strengthen the separation movement in Quebec while at the same time alienating the west. Pierre is Ontario's sweetheart and is the most polarizing political figure in Canadian history.
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 8396551)
Canada needs more polarizing characters. Stick Trudeau's name up on the school.
yea, on top of the annual bonfire.....:sneaky: |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
One the the great liberals of the 20th century.
I don't think I would want to live in a Canada that had not been transformed by Trudeau and Pearson. Of course, the Albertans didn't like him. Nor did Maggie, which is always a recommendation. |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 8396517)
Eastern barstward.
Go freeze in the dark. I remember the NEP.:sneaky: |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 8396885)
Clearly you do. Did you coin the slogan?
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by JonboyE
(Post 8396853)
One the the great liberals of the 20th century.
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 8396990)
He was buddies with Castro
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Didn't Mick Jagger knob his wife?
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8397017)
Didn't Mick Jagger knob his wife?
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 8396990)
He was buddies with Castro
According to the Wiki bio The National Archives of Canada, in its biographical sketches of Canadian prime ministers, records how on one occasion during the war Trudeau and his friends drove their motorcycles wearing Prussian military uniforms, complete with pointed steel helmets. Is this really true? |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8397042)
And didn't seem to have any particular aversion to national socialism either.
According to the Wiki bio The National Archives of Canada, in its biographical sketches of Canadian prime ministers, records how on one occasion during the war Trudeau and his friends drove their motorcycles wearing Prussian military uniforms, complete with pointed steel helmets. Is this really true? |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 8397105)
The CIA didn't trust him, our allies hated him. Trudeau was a closet commie IMO.
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 8397105)
The CIA didn't trust him, our allies hated him. Trudeau was a closet commie IMO.
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8397184)
Give me a break. :rofl:
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 8397105)
The CIA didn't trust him, our allies hated him. Trudeau was a closet commie IMO.
Trudeau was the first world leader to agree to meet John Lennon and his wife Yoko Ono on their 'tour for world peace'. Lennon said, after talking with Trudeau for 50 minutes, that Trudeau was "a beautiful person" and that "if all politicians were like Pierre Trudeau, there would be world peace." On March 4, 1971, the Prime Minister married Margaret Sinclair, a woman who, at 22, was 30 years his junior. They later divorced. The Liberal victory in 1980 highlighted a sharp geographical divide in the country: the party had won no seats west of Manitoba. Trudeau had to resort to having Senators appointed to Cabinet to ensure representation from all regions. The introduction of the National Energy Program (NEP) created a firestorm of protest in the Western provinces and increased what many termed "Western alienation." |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8397017)
Didn't Mick Jagger knob his wife?
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by JonboyE
(Post 8396853)
One the the great liberals of the 20th century.
I don't think I would want to live in a Canada that had not been transformed by Trudeau and Pearson. Of course, the Albertans didn't like him. Nor did Maggie, which is always a recommendation. |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Trudeau was a devout Catholic all his life. Hardly a commie.
Anyway, as we are all quoting from the wiki this is what he did for Canada: One of Trudeau's most enduring legacies is the 1982 patriation of the Canadian constitution, including a domestic amending formula and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It is seen as advancing civil rights and liberties and, notwithstanding clause aside, has become a cornerstone of Canadian values for most Canadians. It also represented the final step in Trudeau's liberal vision of a fully independent and nationalist Canada based on fundamental human rights and the protection of individual freedoms as well as those of linguistic and cultural minorities. Court challenges based on the Charter of Rights have been used to advance the cause of women's equality, re-establish French school boards in provinces such as Alberta and Saskatchewan, and to mandate the adoption of same-sex marriage all across Canada. Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, has clarified issues of aboriginal and equality rights, including establishing the previously denied aboriginal rights of Métis. Section 15, dealing with equality rights, has been used to remedy societal discrimination against minority groups. The coupling of the direct and indirect influences of the Charter has meant that it has grown to influence every aspect of Canadian life, and the override (notwithstanding clause) of the Charter has been infrequently used. |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
And, since I can read wikis as well as the next man, let's return to the NEP, which was a policy we could do with re-introducing today.
"The NEP was introduced in the wake of the energy crises of the 1970s. Because of high oil prices, several economic problems that were beginning to manifest themselves through the 1970s were accelerated and magnified. Inflation was out of control and interest rates were through the roof. Unemployment was epidemic in the eastern provinces where the Trudeau government had much of its political support.[1] The NEP was designed to promote oil self-sufficiency for Canada, maintain the oil supply, particularly for the industrial base in eastern Canada, promote Canadian ownership of the energy industry, promote lower prices, promote exploration for oil in Canada, promote alternative energy sources, and increase government revenues from oil sales through a variety of taxes and agreements.[2] " Western alienation? Read Albertan greed and irresponsibility coupled with domination of said province's politics by rapacious oil companies. |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by JonboyE
(Post 8397417)
Trudeau was a devout Catholic all his life. Hardly a commie.
Anyway, as we are all quoting from the wiki this is what he did for Canada: One of Trudeau's most enduring legacies is the 1982 patriation of the Canadian constitution, including a domestic amending formula and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It is seen as advancing civil rights and liberties and, notwithstanding clause aside, has become a cornerstone of Canadian values for most Canadians. It also represented the final step in Trudeau's liberal vision of a fully independent and nationalist Canada based on fundamental human rights and the protection of individual freedoms as well as those of linguistic and cultural minorities. Court challenges based on the Charter of Rights have been used to advance the cause of women's equality, re-establish French school boards in provinces such as Alberta and Saskatchewan, and to mandate the adoption of same-sex marriage all across Canada. Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, has clarified issues of aboriginal and equality rights, including establishing the previously denied aboriginal rights of Métis. Section 15, dealing with equality rights, has been used to remedy societal discrimination against minority groups. The coupling of the direct and indirect influences of the Charter has meant that it has grown to influence every aspect of Canadian life, and the override (notwithstanding clause) of the Charter has been infrequently used. The Constitution was a complete fudge based on the fact that, to achieve the agreement of the Provinces, Trudeau had no alternative but to water down what it should have stood for to something that is the cause of all the "them and us" strife that one sees from all of the Provinces. The "Fathers of Confederation" supposedly wished to avoid the State versus Federal battles highlighted by the US Constitution, with the intention that, essentially, the Feds would have way more power than the Provinces. Unfortunately, it turned out the other way and the things that were supposed to be avoided, became entrenched. Canada had a Bill of Rights long before the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, one simply replaced the other. The Notwithstanding Clause is virtually universally used in Quebec. I think you need to do some more homework.:p |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 8397458)
Western alienation? Read Albertan greed and irresponsibility coupled with domination of said province's politics by rapacious oil companies.
No one can seriously argue that it is fair that the "have not" Provinces are able to spend to silly levels for services that those that are paying for them (the "have" Provinces) do not provide due to fiscal responsibility. If we all spent at the levels that the fiscally irresponsible Provinces do, Canada would be in deep, deep do-da! To put it another way, why does Quebec, not "export" it's cheap electricity to the remainder of Canada at prices way below market rates, instead of sending it south of the border? What is good for one, must surely be good for the other - no:p |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8397403)
I am reading Canadian political history at the moment. How was Canada "transformed" by Trudeau? I am genuinely interested because, it would seem from my readings, that he entrenched the feelings of "them and us" between francophones and anglophones. Is this the "transformation" to which refer?
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8397482)
'
How so, the NEP deliberately held oil prices in Canada, well below the open market price and usurped the Provincial jurisdiction over such commodities, largely to ensure that the Trudeau's supporters in the East continued to obtain below market prices at the expense of those in the West that sourced the product. No one can seriously argue that it is fair that the "have not" Provinces are able to spend to silly levels for services that those that are paying for them (the "have" Provinces) do not provide due to fiscal responsibility. If we all spent at the levels that the fiscally irresponsible Provinces do, Canada would be in deep, deep do-da! To put it another way, why does Quebec, not "export" it's cheap electricity to the remainder of Canada at prices way below market rates, instead of sending it south of the border? What is good for one, must surely be good for the other - no:p |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8397403)
I am reading Canadian political history at the moment. How was Canada "transformed" by Trudeau?
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 8397494)
But doesn't this rather jar with your previous contention that the fathers of confederation had in mind less provincial power vis a vis the federal government?
I find the bickering between the Provinces pathetic. I would much prefer a powerful Federal authority, with appropriate powers delegated to Provincial Jurisdiction. If that was the case, it would be more likely that social services across the country would be more harmonised than they currently are. |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 8397486)
I think it only fair for you to say which author(s) interpretation of Canadian political history is informing your views at the moment.
I have no idea what the earlier books were. I hate academia and read, not to impress others, but to become informed. |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8397502)
He let us in. Mass immigration, multiculturalism, bilingualism, sexual tolerance eventually leading to acceptance of same-sex marriage, the features that define Canada today, stem from the Trudeau era.
I thought the Mulroney era was responsible for formulating multiculturalism (Multiculturism Act 1988). From an American viewpoint, I guess you could argue that same-sex marrige etc, "defines" Canada. I doubt the rest of the world would agree. I may be wrong, and I am happy to be corrected, but I thought that the Trudeau era was defined by stagflation, an immigration policy to ensure that only "desirables" were allowed in, high interest rates, ineffective government response to economic problems, the NEP, discontent with the Provinces and huge issues with Quebec (with the resulting f*&k up that is the unamendable Constitution). |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8397403)
I am reading Canadian political history at the moment. How was Canada "transformed" by Trudeau? I am genuinely interested because, it would seem from my readings, that he entrenched the feelings of "them and us" between francophones and anglophones. Is this the "transformation" to which refer?
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8397502)
He let us in.
Hardly. My father worked in Canada in the 50s as did quite a lot of his contempories. He packed his suitcase got on the ship and off he went. None of this TWP PR stuff. Mass immigration, multiculturalism, bilingualism, sexual tolerance eventually leading to acceptance of same-sex marriage, the features that define Canada today, stem from the Trudeau era. None of this is unique to Canada. An earlier posting said he was a devout catholic in which case he would hardly approve of the last item. |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8397510)
I said that was the intention, the reality is that the Privy Council ruled against the Feds and supported the Provinces early on.
I find the bickering between the Provinces pathetic. I would much prefer a powerful Federal authority, with appropriate powers delegated to Provincial Jurisdiction. If that was the case, it would be more likely that social services across the country would be more harmonised than they currently are. |
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 8397572)
On this point I am in complete agreement with you.
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8397580)
You would say that living in Ontario, but we need our interests protected in the west, otherwise we'll get right royally shafted by you eastern egotists.
|
Re: Calgary school won't be named Trudeau
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8397403)
I am reading Canadian political history at the moment. How was Canada "transformed" by Trudeau? I am genuinely interested because, it would seem from my readings, that he entrenched the feelings of "them and us" between francophones and anglophones. Is this the "transformation" to which refer?
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8397502)
He let us in. Mass immigration, multiculturalism, bilingualism, sexual tolerance eventually leading to acceptance of same-sex marriage, the features that define Canada today, stem from the Trudeau era.
Um, mass immigration has been the norm in North America. Trudeau had nothing to do with any of the things you mention. Trudeau was about an all powerful federal government in a huge country with distinct regions. Trudeau=fail |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:35 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.