![]() |
Re: Best City in the World
Originally Posted by London Mike
(Post 9194497)
I see.
"Stability"? Vancouver's in an earthquake zone isn't it? Not very stable. And it rains all the frickin time too. Weather and environment aren't in the same bracket? Good job sporting prowess didn't feature as a criteria at all - Toronto would have plummeted. |
Re: Best City in the World
Originally Posted by London Mike
(Post 9194497)
it rains all the frickin time too
|
Re: Best City in the World
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 9194518)
There's only two cities on that list that even play proper sports.
Please don't say Calgary or anywhere based in Oz. |
Re: Best City in the World
The rankings are so close, it makes me wonder why the positions change so little year on year. I mean Vancouver scores 98% and 10th place Auckland scores 95.7%. No-one is going to notice a 2.3% difference in ratings.
It makes me smile the leap that people make from what the survey is about to what you see in the headlines. The survey basically ranks 140 cities across 5 areas to determine hardship allowances for expats. Vancouver ranks as the city with the 'least hardships'. The headlines you see are best city in the world/best place on earth etc. Whilst in a survey like this, I can see why Vancouver would do well, I'm still staggered that it rates highly in terms of culture !! Mind you it didn't seem to hurt Calgary either. Perhaps that is explanation enough. |
Re: Best City in the World
Originally Posted by London Mike
(Post 9194544)
Sorry, but it's sport not sports. Just a bugbear of mine ;)
Please don't say Calgary or anywhere based in Oz. 1. sport (noun/singular): Johhny loves sport. 2. sports (noun/plural): Johnny plays two sports; football and tennis. 3. sports (adjective): Johhny reads the sports news every day. |
Vancouver top city to live
Just read this on yahoo:
http://uk.travel.yahoo.com/p-promo-3360769 Hoping to go Vancouver if I get accepted on IEC! London No53 in that list lol |
Re: Vancouver top city to live
Originally Posted by mrtomsterman
(Post 9194783)
Just read this on yahoo:
http://uk.travel.yahoo.com/p-promo-3360769 Hoping to go Vancouver if I get accepted on IEC! London No53 in that list lol |
Re: Best City in the World
Sorry for double post :o kind of got over excited and didnt look :p
|
Re: Best City in the World
Still dont believe London is 53?..people who do these surveys must be the same that compile the worlds top 100 sexiest women list surely.
|
Re: Best City in the World
Originally Posted by cheeky_monkey
(Post 9194904)
Still dont believe London is 53?..people who do these surveys must be the same that compile the worlds top 100 sexiest women list surely.
|
Re: Best City in the World
Originally Posted by ducktastic
(Post 9193995)
On the world stage Vancouver has done nothing to shape the world like dynamic cities such as London, Rome or New York and I struggle calling it world class yet. But as truly great such cities are, how truly livable are they? While they hit the mark on general vibrancy, culture, economy and world influence, where do they stand on day to day livability (depending on how one defines it of course)? How accessible are green spaces, what is the crime like, how about over-crowding, the commute......etc Mercer and the Economist tend to focus on such tangibles as education, stability, healthcare, air quality, etc while Monocle (Vancouver was number 16 the last time) focuses more on factors that amount to quality of life, access to parks, restaurants, sport facilities, etc. Larger power houses like London and New York tend to not make the grade in these studies as they are typically heavily balanced towards certain factors and don't hit a broader range of factors. London might be great for history and culture, but where are the uncrowded green spaces and parks, and opportunities to pursue outdoor activities. While Vancouver falls off the mark in some areas, it sure is livable and offers a very high standard of livability overall. Like it or love it, it is livable. Let the snide comments begin.... |
Re: Best City in the World
Originally Posted by London Mike
(Post 9194497)
I see.
"Stability"? Vancouver's in an earthquake zone isn't it? Not very stable. And it rains all the frickin time too. Weather and environment aren't in the same bracket? Good job sporting prowess didn't feature as a criteria at all - Toronto would have plummeted. |
Re: Best City in the World
Originally Posted by dboy
(Post 9195220)
Rains all the time.....well at least you get 10 out of 10 for being original...yawn....(did you know that TO gets more rain during the summer than Vancouver;)
|
Re: Best City in the World
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 9195223)
It's snowing where I am. It's a winter wonderland in my back garden.
|
Re: Best City in the World
Originally Posted by dboy
(Post 9195216)
London might be great for history and culture, but where are the uncrowded green spaces and parks, and opportunities to pursue outdoor activities.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:17 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.