last question
#1
last question
hi
can anyone tell me when numbering the pages do i number the application form and the form 80 forms
jan xx
can anyone tell me when numbering the pages do i number the application form and the form 80 forms
jan xx
#2
Re: last question
Originally Posted by robos
hi
can anyone tell me when numbering the pages do i number the application form and the form 80 forms
jan xx
can anyone tell me when numbering the pages do i number the application form and the form 80 forms
jan xx
Dave
#4
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 369
Re: last question
Originally Posted by robos
hi
can anyone tell me when numbering the pages do i number the application form and the form 80 forms
jan xx
can anyone tell me when numbering the pages do i number the application form and the form 80 forms
jan xx
Most recently we reformatted and annotated 'hacked' the DIMIA Checklist and introduced:
Evidence of spouse’s English language ability - folios 1 to 5,
Documents submitted to TRA – - folios 6 to 102 {Also see folios 129 to 143} ,
Then Forms 80 - folios 103 to 106,
and so on ... up to folio 169, our covering letter, in which we wrote:
We hope you will find our annotations to the Subclass xxx Document Checklist constructive.
The Document Checklist was introduced at folios 166 to 168.
The application was accepted as valid.
We are not suggesting that you 'hack' the form, leave that to those of us who have nothing better to do, and the software to do it.
If you wanted to be Devilish you could folio? (last time I checked it was a noun) the pages in reverse order and give ASPC something to do. For all I know that is what we have done 'bottom up' is not defined in this context.
Don't worry too much about it. Do the best you can.
Westly Russell
Migration Agent
#5
Re: last question
Originally Posted by WESTLY
Where did you intoduce the documents you submitted to TRA?
Most recently we reformatted and annotated 'hacked' the DIMIA Checklist and introduced:
Evidence of spouse’s English language ability - folios 1 to 5,
Documents submitted to TRA – - folios 6 to 102 {Also see folios 129 to 143} ,
Then Forms 80 - folios 103 to 106,
and so on ... up to folio 169, our covering letter, in which we wrote:
We hope you will find our annotations to the Subclass xxx Document Checklist constructive.
The Document Checklist was introduced at folios 166 to 168.
The application was accepted as valid.
We are not suggesting that you 'hack' the form, leave that to those of us who have nothing better to do, and the software to do it.
If you wanted to be Devilish you could folio? (last time I checked it was a noun) the pages in reverse order and give ASPC something to do. For all I know that is what we have done 'bottom up' is not defined in this context.
Don't worry too much about it. Do the best you can.
Westly Russell
Migration Agent
Most recently we reformatted and annotated 'hacked' the DIMIA Checklist and introduced:
Evidence of spouse’s English language ability - folios 1 to 5,
Documents submitted to TRA – - folios 6 to 102 {Also see folios 129 to 143} ,
Then Forms 80 - folios 103 to 106,
and so on ... up to folio 169, our covering letter, in which we wrote:
We hope you will find our annotations to the Subclass xxx Document Checklist constructive.
The Document Checklist was introduced at folios 166 to 168.
The application was accepted as valid.
We are not suggesting that you 'hack' the form, leave that to those of us who have nothing better to do, and the software to do it.
If you wanted to be Devilish you could folio? (last time I checked it was a noun) the pages in reverse order and give ASPC something to do. For all I know that is what we have done 'bottom up' is not defined in this context.
Don't worry too much about it. Do the best you can.
Westly Russell
Migration Agent