Contributory Parent Visa - Still Sparkling!!! - Part 4
#901
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 737
Re: Contributory Parent Visa - Still Sparkling!!! - Part 4
Cheers
Matt
#902
Just Joined
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: essex
Posts: 9
Re: Long wait for CO
Hi, the time is usually around 16 months, give or take. Sandch who posts on here has very kindly set up a tracker so you can have a look at timelines on there. Here's the link:
www.gainwave.co.uk
www.gainwave.co.uk
#903
Forum Regular
Joined: Sep 2009
Location: Butler, Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 49
Re: Long wait for CO
Keep in touch
Pat & John.
#904
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Bexley, Kent
Posts: 326
Re: Long wait for CO
I know that feeling of disappointment, but you will be surprised how quickly the time flies. Have you sent off your application and received your acknowlegement yet? From when you get a CO it can be a couple of months until you get your visa so not soooo bad altogether 16 - 24 months and you can be there. Unless of course you choose another route like the 173 Temporary visa and then transfer to 143. We have some people on the forum that have done that. We should have a CO sometime soon and have sold and moved out of the house etc which all takes time so there are things to do.
Chin Up!
#906
Just Joined
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 18
Re: Long wait for CO
We have applied for a 173 does that mean it is quicker than a straight 143? We are hoping to go the Sunshine Coast where my daughter and 3 grandchildren are although i also have a son in Perth so it was quite a decision but seeing the grandchildren grow up is what i would like to do we can always fly to Perth for a holiday and my son come to us.
I love the forum it is great hearing peoples views and experiences.
I love the forum it is great hearing peoples views and experiences.
#907
Re: Contributory Parent Visa - Still Sparkling!!! - Part 4
Hi
Timescales for 143 & 173 are the same. The only difference is when the BIG MONEY payments are made.
Charlie
Timescales for 143 & 173 are the same. The only difference is when the BIG MONEY payments are made.
Charlie
#909
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 556
Re: Contributory Parent Visa - Still Sparkling!!! - Part 4
hi all - havent had a chance to log on for a while - but am now looking for some advice re my dads CPV application.
Dad originally applied for s143 CPV in June 2009 as a single applicant. During the 14 months since his initial application Dad's situation has changed and he is now in a defacto relationship with his girlfriend. They would like to make the move to Australia together. I am wondering what options we have open to us now regarding dads application? We expect to get a case officer for him in the next couple of months so I am keen to clarify things before then.
1. from the reading I have done on the internet it seems that in the past he would have been able to sponsor his partner on a spouse visa as soon as he was granted his visa and became a permanent resident. am i correct in understanding that immigration have now stopped this from happening until 5 years from the date the applicant becomes a permanent resident? If we were to go along this route should we be notifying immigration now that dad is in a defacto relationship? Am I correct in thinking that immigration could change their policy on this again in the future and rule out CPV holders sponsoring spouses at any point? (eg its a risky path to take)
2. I guess the alternative would be to add dads partner to his application now. from a financial perspective am i correct that this would incur an additional 2nd instalment charge of approx $32k (the 2nd instalment charge at the date of dads original application) plus the assurance of support would increase from $10k to $14k? (this additional cost looks HUGE!) if this is the route we take, how would we go about adding dads partner to his application? Is it just a change of circumstances form or are their other forms to complete? Does it matter in any way that dads partner is not a family member of dads sponsor (my sister)?
3. can anyone offer any other possibilities??
Any advice anyone can offer would be gratefully received. I expect that this situation isnt unusual, given the length of time between lodgement of application and visa being granted, lots of peoples circumstances must change.
thanks
Dad originally applied for s143 CPV in June 2009 as a single applicant. During the 14 months since his initial application Dad's situation has changed and he is now in a defacto relationship with his girlfriend. They would like to make the move to Australia together. I am wondering what options we have open to us now regarding dads application? We expect to get a case officer for him in the next couple of months so I am keen to clarify things before then.
1. from the reading I have done on the internet it seems that in the past he would have been able to sponsor his partner on a spouse visa as soon as he was granted his visa and became a permanent resident. am i correct in understanding that immigration have now stopped this from happening until 5 years from the date the applicant becomes a permanent resident? If we were to go along this route should we be notifying immigration now that dad is in a defacto relationship? Am I correct in thinking that immigration could change their policy on this again in the future and rule out CPV holders sponsoring spouses at any point? (eg its a risky path to take)
2. I guess the alternative would be to add dads partner to his application now. from a financial perspective am i correct that this would incur an additional 2nd instalment charge of approx $32k (the 2nd instalment charge at the date of dads original application) plus the assurance of support would increase from $10k to $14k? (this additional cost looks HUGE!) if this is the route we take, how would we go about adding dads partner to his application? Is it just a change of circumstances form or are their other forms to complete? Does it matter in any way that dads partner is not a family member of dads sponsor (my sister)?
3. can anyone offer any other possibilities??
Any advice anyone can offer would be gratefully received. I expect that this situation isnt unusual, given the length of time between lodgement of application and visa being granted, lots of peoples circumstances must change.
thanks
#911
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 909
Re: Contributory Parent Visa - Still Sparkling!!! - Part 4
hi all - havent had a chance to log on for a while - but am now looking for some advice re my dads CPV application.
Dad originally applied for s143 CPV in June 2009 as a single applicant. During the 14 months since his initial application Dad's situation has changed and he is now in a defacto relationship with his girlfriend. They would like to make the move to Australia together. I am wondering what options we have open to us now regarding dads application? We expect to get a case officer for him in the next couple of months so I am keen to clarify things before then.
1. from the reading I have done on the internet it seems that in the past he would have been able to sponsor his partner on a spouse visa as soon as he was granted his visa and became a permanent resident. am i correct in understanding that immigration have now stopped this from happening until 5 years from the date the applicant becomes a permanent resident? If we were to go along this route should we be notifying immigration now that dad is in a defacto relationship? Am I correct in thinking that immigration could change their policy on this again in the future and rule out CPV holders sponsoring spouses at any point? (eg its a risky path to take)
2. I guess the alternative would be to add dads partner to his application now. from a financial perspective am i correct that this would incur an additional 2nd instalment charge of approx $32k (the 2nd instalment charge at the date of dads original application) plus the assurance of support would increase from $10k to $14k? (this additional cost looks HUGE!) if this is the route we take, how would we go about adding dads partner to his application? Is it just a change of circumstances form or are their other forms to complete? Does it matter in any way that dads partner is not a family member of dads sponsor (my sister)?
3. can anyone offer any other possibilities??
Any advice anyone can offer would be gratefully received. I expect that this situation isnt unusual, given the length of time between lodgement of application and visa being granted, lots of peoples circumstances must change.
thanks
Dad originally applied for s143 CPV in June 2009 as a single applicant. During the 14 months since his initial application Dad's situation has changed and he is now in a defacto relationship with his girlfriend. They would like to make the move to Australia together. I am wondering what options we have open to us now regarding dads application? We expect to get a case officer for him in the next couple of months so I am keen to clarify things before then.
1. from the reading I have done on the internet it seems that in the past he would have been able to sponsor his partner on a spouse visa as soon as he was granted his visa and became a permanent resident. am i correct in understanding that immigration have now stopped this from happening until 5 years from the date the applicant becomes a permanent resident? If we were to go along this route should we be notifying immigration now that dad is in a defacto relationship? Am I correct in thinking that immigration could change their policy on this again in the future and rule out CPV holders sponsoring spouses at any point? (eg its a risky path to take)
2. I guess the alternative would be to add dads partner to his application now. from a financial perspective am i correct that this would incur an additional 2nd instalment charge of approx $32k (the 2nd instalment charge at the date of dads original application) plus the assurance of support would increase from $10k to $14k? (this additional cost looks HUGE!) if this is the route we take, how would we go about adding dads partner to his application? Is it just a change of circumstances form or are their other forms to complete? Does it matter in any way that dads partner is not a family member of dads sponsor (my sister)?
3. can anyone offer any other possibilities??
Any advice anyone can offer would be gratefully received. I expect that this situation isnt unusual, given the length of time between lodgement of application and visa being granted, lots of peoples circumstances must change.
thanks
I think you are correct in your assessment of (1). I can see (2) being an issue as I would expect them to want to see all the normal evidence of a lasting relationship (otherwise it's an easy, if expensive, route in).
But I don't know. Try Gill over on PIO, but this might turn out to be one of those situations where a good agent is actually useful.
Good luck
Steve
#913
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 909
Re: Long wait for CO
We have applied for a 173 does that mean it is quicker than a straight 143? We are hoping to go the Sunshine Coast where my daughter and 3 grandchildren are although i also have a son in Perth so it was quite a decision but seeing the grandchildren grow up is what i would like to do we can always fly to Perth for a holiday and my son come to us.
I love the forum it is great hearing peoples views and experiences.
I love the forum it is great hearing peoples views and experiences.
#914
Just Joined
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 18
Re: Long wait for CO
Thank you so much for this information it is nice to speak to someone in the know.
When you are in Australia with the temporary 173 visa how long does it take to then get the 143 visa will it take the same length of time as to get the 173?
As you have to have the 143 before the 173 runs out i just wondered if you have to apply as soon as you get there or is it a lot shorter time.
#915
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 556
Re: Contributory Parent Visa - Still Sparkling!!! - Part 4
Hello there. Complications by the looks of things.
I think you are correct in your assessment of (1). I can see (2) being an issue as I would expect them to want to see all the normal evidence of a lasting relationship (otherwise it's an easy, if expensive, route in).
But I don't know. Try Gill over on PIO, but this might turn out to be one of those situations where a good agent is actually useful.
Good luck
Steve
I think you are correct in your assessment of (1). I can see (2) being an issue as I would expect them to want to see all the normal evidence of a lasting relationship (otherwise it's an easy, if expensive, route in).
But I don't know. Try Gill over on PIO, but this might turn out to be one of those situations where a good agent is actually useful.
Good luck
Steve
I agree an agent could be the way forward, but just thought I'd post on here and PIO first for any suggestions. Not sure the additional cost is a financially viable option - worrying times...