Wikiposts

Anyone can explain the discrepancy of ACS

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 8th 2003 | 6:51 pm
  #1  
Thread Starter
Just Joined
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13
qiqin is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Anyone can explain the discrepancy of ACS

This is extracted from acs:

Work Experience for RPL
Applicants who apply for RPL and do not hold a recognised academic tertiary qualification will have deducted from their total work experience a period of relevant IT professional experience deemed necessary to have reached the level of qualification allocated. For example, if an applicant is allocated a qualification level equivalent to a 2-year diploma, they will have two years deducted from the total of their recognized work experience (effective as of 11 April).

This is from updated form 1121i--Skill Assessment Process

If you do not possess a recognized qualification in IT (or IT sub-discipline) but you have a qualification in another discipline together with significant experience in IT and extensive professional development education you may apply for Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL)

May any experts in the forum spare some time to explain this ????
 
Old Jul 8th 2003 | 8:33 pm
  #2  
ptlabs's Avatar
Ex Mod (2002-2005)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,464
From: NSW
ptlabs has a reputation beyond reputeptlabs has a reputation beyond reputeptlabs has a reputation beyond reputeptlabs has a reputation beyond reputeptlabs has a reputation beyond reputeptlabs has a reputation beyond reputeptlabs has a reputation beyond reputeptlabs has a reputation beyond reputeptlabs has a reputation beyond reputeptlabs has a reputation beyond reputeptlabs has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Anyone can explain the discrepancy of ACS

Originally posted by qiqin
May any experts in the forum spare some time to explain this ????
Firstly I don't see any inconsistency here. The DIMIA form merely says a person may qualify. The skills assessment agency (in this case, the ACS) is wholy responsible for the skills assessment. DIMIA has no role to play when it comes to assessing the skills of an applicant.

I would also urge you to spare some of your time to do some research by searching the archives of this forum/newsgroup for previous discussions on deeming dates, although things are fluid at the moment.


Peter
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.