Re: Mr Miller please advise us .
Jun 18th 2003, 11:37 am
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mr Miller please advise us .
Andrew
I thought the new IRPA selection grid was supposed to bring the system
back into balance.
Are you really saying that CHC London is getting more applications
than they have visas, even allowing for rejections? If that's the
case and it's repeated elsewhere surely the pass mark has got to go
up?
Or are they getting a lot of applications that are doomed to
rejection? In this case it would be well worth Canada adopting a
variant of Australia's 'pre-application skill assessment' policy.
Jeremy
>n Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:50:16 GMT, "Andrew Miller" wrote:
>It is not that CHC London is slow - it is the
>overwhelming number of cases (well exceeding their annual quotas and thus
>processing capacity) that make process longer than desired. Patience is the
>virtue here...
This is not intended to be legal advice in any jurisdiction
I thought the new IRPA selection grid was supposed to bring the system
back into balance.
Are you really saying that CHC London is getting more applications
than they have visas, even allowing for rejections? If that's the
case and it's repeated elsewhere surely the pass mark has got to go
up?
Or are they getting a lot of applications that are doomed to
rejection? In this case it would be well worth Canada adopting a
variant of Australia's 'pre-application skill assessment' policy.
Jeremy
>n Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:50:16 GMT, "Andrew Miller" wrote:
>It is not that CHC London is slow - it is the
>overwhelming number of cases (well exceeding their annual quotas and thus
>processing capacity) that make process longer than desired. Patience is the
>virtue here...
This is not intended to be legal advice in any jurisdiction
Jun 18th 2003, 10:34 pm
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mr Miller please advise us .
Myself and my wife are currently waiting for some news form the Canadian high
commishion in London we applied in early November 2002 and three months later
recieved our case file number and recipt, So far its coming up to 7.5 months
and we are still waiting for some news . Why are they taking so long, we have a
very attractive case and are very optimistic we will succeed. Do you know what
the hold ups are and any time scales on the future events that myself and my
wife can expect. Is it true london is very slow at processing PR applications
and is there anything i can do to speed things up????
Please email me .
please advise us
thankyou
mike
[email protected]
commishion in London we applied in early November 2002 and three months later
recieved our case file number and recipt, So far its coming up to 7.5 months
and we are still waiting for some news . Why are they taking so long, we have a
very attractive case and are very optimistic we will succeed. Do you know what
the hold ups are and any time scales on the future events that myself and my
wife can expect. Is it true london is very slow at processing PR applications
and is there anything i can do to speed things up????
Please email me .
please advise us
thankyou
mike
[email protected]
Jun 18th 2003, 10:50 pm
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mr Miller please advise us .
It doesn't matter how attractive your case is - processing takes time.
Currently visas are being issued for cases submitted in late summer of 2001
(with interview required) or submitted in the first half of 2002 if
interview was waived. You should expect decision about interview within next
2 to 5 or so months. There is absolutely nothing you or anyone can do to
speed up the process, sorry. It is not that CHC London is slow - it is the
overwhelming number of cases (well exceeding their annual quotas and thus
processing capacity) that make process longer than desired. Patience is the
virtue here...
--
../..
Andrew Miller
Immigration Consultant
Vancouver, British Columbia
email: [email protected]
(delete REMOVE from the above address before sending email)
________________________________
"MIACOVELLI9122" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Myself and my wife are currently waiting for some news form the Canadian
high
> commishion in London we applied in early November 2002 and three months
later
> recieved our case file number and recipt, So far its coming up to 7.5
months
> and we are still waiting for some news . Why are they taking so long, we
have a
> very attractive case and are very optimistic we will succeed. Do you know
what
> the hold ups are and any time scales on the future events that myself and
my
> wife can expect. Is it true london is very slow at processing PR
applications
> and is there anything i can do to speed things up????
> Please email me .
> please advise us
> thankyou
> mike
> [email protected]
Currently visas are being issued for cases submitted in late summer of 2001
(with interview required) or submitted in the first half of 2002 if
interview was waived. You should expect decision about interview within next
2 to 5 or so months. There is absolutely nothing you or anyone can do to
speed up the process, sorry. It is not that CHC London is slow - it is the
overwhelming number of cases (well exceeding their annual quotas and thus
processing capacity) that make process longer than desired. Patience is the
virtue here...
--
../..
Andrew Miller
Immigration Consultant
Vancouver, British Columbia
email: [email protected]
(delete REMOVE from the above address before sending email)
________________________________
"MIACOVELLI9122" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Myself and my wife are currently waiting for some news form the Canadian
high
> commishion in London we applied in early November 2002 and three months
later
> recieved our case file number and recipt, So far its coming up to 7.5
months
> and we are still waiting for some news . Why are they taking so long, we
have a
> very attractive case and are very optimistic we will succeed. Do you know
what
> the hold ups are and any time scales on the future events that myself and
my
> wife can expect. Is it true london is very slow at processing PR
applications
> and is there anything i can do to speed things up????
> Please email me .
> please advise us
> thankyou
> mike
> [email protected]
Jun 19th 2003, 2:34 pm
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mr Miller please advise us .
Selection criteria in IRPA Regulations are intended to bring the balance -
but it doesn't mean that it will work that way immediately. This is why
interactivity clause was introduced in new law - selection criteria (pass
mark) will be adjusted as we go (up or down) to maintain balance and the
first review is expected to take place in November.
--
../..
Andrew Miller
Immigration Consultant
Vancouver, British Columbia
email: [email protected]
(delete REMOVE from the above address before sending email)
________________________________
"JAJ" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Andrew
> I thought the new IRPA selection grid was supposed to bring the system
> back into balance.
> Are you really saying that CHC London is getting more applications
> than they have visas, even allowing for rejections? If that's the
> case and it's repeated elsewhere surely the pass mark has got to go
> up?
> Or are they getting a lot of applications that are doomed to
> rejection? In this case it would be well worth Canada adopting a
> variant of Australia's 'pre-application skill assessment' policy.
> Jeremy
> >n Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:50:16 GMT, "Andrew Miller"
wrote:
> >It is not that CHC London is slow - it is the
> >overwhelming number of cases (well exceeding their annual quotas and thus
> >processing capacity) that make process longer than desired. Patience is
the
> >virtue here...
> This is not intended to be legal advice in any jurisdiction
but it doesn't mean that it will work that way immediately. This is why
interactivity clause was introduced in new law - selection criteria (pass
mark) will be adjusted as we go (up or down) to maintain balance and the
first review is expected to take place in November.
--
../..
Andrew Miller
Immigration Consultant
Vancouver, British Columbia
email: [email protected]
(delete REMOVE from the above address before sending email)
________________________________
"JAJ" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Andrew
> I thought the new IRPA selection grid was supposed to bring the system
> back into balance.
> Are you really saying that CHC London is getting more applications
> than they have visas, even allowing for rejections? If that's the
> case and it's repeated elsewhere surely the pass mark has got to go
> up?
> Or are they getting a lot of applications that are doomed to
> rejection? In this case it would be well worth Canada adopting a
> variant of Australia's 'pre-application skill assessment' policy.
> Jeremy
> >n Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:50:16 GMT, "Andrew Miller"
wrote:
> >It is not that CHC London is slow - it is the
> >overwhelming number of cases (well exceeding their annual quotas and thus
> >processing capacity) that make process longer than desired. Patience is
the
> >virtue here...
> This is not intended to be legal advice in any jurisdiction
